Analysis of Impinging and Countercurrent Stagnating Flows by Reynolds Stress Model

2002 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 706-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong H. Im ◽  
Kang Y. Huh ◽  
Kwang-Yong Kim
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Dissipation Rate ◽  
Flow Characteristics ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Stagnation Region

Numerical simulation is performed for stagnating turbulent flows of impinging and countercurrent jets by the Reynolds stress model (RSM). Results are compared with those of the k−ε model and available data to assess the flow characteristics and turbulence models. Three variants of the RSM tested are those of Gibson and Launder (GL), Craft and Launder (GL-CL) and Speziale, Sarkar and Gatski (SSG). As is well known, the k−ε model significantly overestimates turbulent kinetic energy near the wall. Although the RSM is superior to the k−ε model, it shows considerable difference according to how the redistributive pressure-strain term is modeled. Results of the RSM for countercurrent jets are improved with the modified coefficients for the dissipation rate, Cε1 and Cε2, suggested by Champion and Libby. Anisotropic states of the stress near the stagnation region are assessed in terms of an anisotropy invariant map (AIM).

Improved Prediction of Turbomachinery Flows Using Near-Wall Reynolds-Stress Model

2001 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Gerolymos ◽  
J. Neubauer ◽  
V. C. Sharma ◽  
I. Vallet
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Flow Equations ◽  
Near Wall

In this paper an assessment of the improvement in the prediction of complex turbomachinery flows using a new near-wall Reynolds-stress model is attempted. The turbulence closure used is a near-wall low-turbulence-Reynolds-number Reynolds-stress model, that is independent of the distance-from-the-wall and of the normal-to-the-wall direction. The model takes into account the Coriolis redistribution effect on the Reynolds-stresses. The five mean flow equations and the seven turbulence model equations are solved using an implicit coupled OΔx3 upwind-biased solver. Results are compared with experimental data for three turbomachinery configurations: the NTUA high subsonic annular cascade, the NASA_37 rotor, and the RWTH 1 1/2 stage turbine. A detailed analysis of the flowfield is given. It is seen that the new model that takes into account the Reynolds-stress anisotropy substantially improves the agreement with experimental data, particularily for flows with large separation, while being only 30 percent more expensive than the k−ε model (thanks to an efficient implicit implementation). It is believed that further work on advanced turbulence models will substantially enhance the predictive capability of complex turbulent flows in turbomachinery.

Development and Application of a Two-Scale Non-Linear Reynolds Stress Turbulence Model

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Y. Jaw ◽  
R. R. Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Dissipation Rate ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Turbulence Scale ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Near Wall

To improve the prediction of turbulent flows, a two-scale, non-linear Reynolds stress turbulence model is proposed in this study. It is known that for the near-wall low-Reynolds number turbulent flows, the Kolmogorov turbulence scale, based on the fluid kinematic viscosity and dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy (ν,ε), is the dominant turbulence scale, hence it is adopted to address the viscous effects and the rapid increase of dissipation rate in the near wall region. As a wall is approached, the turbulence scale transits smoothly from turbulent kinetic energy based (k, ε) scale to (ν,ε) scale. The damping functions of the low-Reynolds number models can thus be simplified and the near-wall turbulence characteristics, such as the ε distribution, are correctly reproduced. Furthermore, to improve the prediction of the anisotropic Reynolds stresses for complex flows, a nonlinear algebraic Reynolds stress model is incorporated. The same turbulence scales are adopted in the nonlinear algebraic Reynolds stress model. The developed two-scale non-linear Reynolds stress model is first calibrated with the DNS budgets of two-dimensional channel flows, and then applied to predict the separation flow behind a backward facing step. It is found that the proposed two-scale nonlinear Reynolds stress turbulence model is capable of providing satisfactory results without increasing much computation efforts or causing numerical stability problems.

Measurements and Predictions of a Highly Turbulent Flowfield in a Turbine Vane Passage

2000 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 666-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. Radomsky ◽  
K. A. Thole
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Turbulent Kinetic Energy ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Complex Geometry ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Mean Flow

As highly turbulent flow passes through downstream airfoil passages in a gas turbine engine, it is subjected to a complex geometry designed to accelerate and turn the flow. This acceleration and streamline curvature subject the turbulent flow to high mean flow strains. This paper presents both experimental measurements and computational predictions for highly turbulent flow as it progresses through a passage of a gas turbine stator vane. Three-component velocity fields at the vane midspan were measured for inlet turbulence levels of 0.6%, 10%, and 19.5%. The turbulent kinetic energy increased through the passage by 130% for the 10% inlet turbulence and, because the dissipation rate was higher for the 19.5% inlet turbulence, the turbulent kinetic energy increased by only 31%. With a mean flow acceleration of five through the passage, the exiting local turbulence levels were 3% and 6% for the respective 10% and 19.5% inlet turbulence levels. Computational RANS predictions were compared with the measurements using four different turbulence models including the k-ε, Renormalization Group (RNG) k-ε, realizable k-ε, and Reynolds stress model. The results indicate that the predictions using the Reynolds stress model most closely agreed with the measurements as compared with the other turbulence models with better agreement for the 10% case than the 19.5% case. [S0098-2202(00)00804-X]

Improved Prediction of Turbomachinery Flows Using Near-Wall Reynolds-Stress Model

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Gerolymos ◽  
J. Neubauer ◽  
V. C. Sharma ◽  
I. Vallet
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Flow Equations ◽  
Near Wall

In this paper an assessment of the improvement in the prediction of complex turbomachinery flows using a new near-wall Reynolds-stress model is attempted. The turbulence closure used is a near-wall low-turbulence-Reynolds-number Reynolds-stress model, that is independent of the distance-from-the-wall and of the normal-to-the-wall direction. The model takes into account the Coriolis redistribution effect on the Reynolds-stresses. The 5 mean flow equations and the 7 turbulence model equations are solved using an implicit coupled O(Δx3) upwind-biased solver. Results are compared with experimental data for 3 turbomachinery configurations: the ntua high subsonic annular cascade, the nasa_37 rotor, and the rwth 1½ stage turbine. A detailed analysis of the flowfield is given. It is seen that the new model that takes into account the Reynolds-stress anisotropy substantially improves the agreement with experimental data, particularly for flows with large separation, while being only 30% more expensive than the k – ε model (thanks to an efficient implicit implementation). It is believed that further work on advanced turbulence models will substantially enhance the predictive capability of complex turbulent flows in turbomachinery.

scholarly journals The Problem of Airflow Around Building Clusters in Different Configurations

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateusz Jędrzejewski ◽  
Marta Poćwierz ◽  
Katarzyna Zielonko-Jung
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Pressure Measurement ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Complex Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Qualitative Information ◽  
Pressure Coefficients ◽  
Rsm Model

Abstract In the paper, the authors discuss the construction of a model of an exemplary urban layout. Numerical simulation has been performed by means of a commercial software Fluent using two different turbulence models: the popular k-ε realizable one, and the Reynolds Stress Model (RSM), which is still being developed. The former is a 2-equations model, while the latter – is a RSM model – that consists of 7 equations. The studies have shown that, in this specific case, a more complex model of turbulence is not necessary. The results obtained with this model are not more accurate than the ones obtained using the RKE model. The model, scale 1:400, was tested in a wind tunnel. The pressure measurement near buildings, oil visualization and scour technique were undertaken and described accordingly. Measurements gave the quantitative and qualitative information describing the nature of the flow. Finally, the data were compared with the results of the experiments performed. The pressure coefficients resulting from the experiment were compared with the coefficients obtained from the numerical simulation. At the same time velocity maps and streamlines obtained from the calculations were combined with the results of the oil visualisation and scour technique.

Structural Parameters and Prediction of Adverse Pressure Gradient Turbulent Flows: An Improved k-ε Model

1995 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Chukkapalli ◽  
O¨. F. Turan
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Structural Parameters ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Model Representation ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Kinetic Diffusion

A modified k-ε model is proposed to predict complex, adverse pressure gradient, turbulent diffuser flows. The need for an eddy viscosity is eliminated by using three structural parameters. A fuller treatment of the rate of kinetic diffusion terms is incorporated with a Reynolds stress model representation. A thorough evaluation is given of the three structural parameters in three decreasing and one increasing adverse pressure gradient diffuser flows leading to a three-layer representation. The results indicate the need for better modeling of the ε-equation.

Development and Application of an Anisotropic Two-Equation Model for Flows With Swirl and Curvature

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohua Wang ◽  
Siva Thangam
Keyword(s):  
Energy Spectrum ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Scaling Laws ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Equation Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Generalized Model

An anisotropic two-equation Reynolds-stress model is developed by modeling the energy spectrum and through invariance based scaling. In this approach the effect of rotation is used to modify the energy spectrum, while the influence of swirl is modeled based on scaling laws. The resulting generalized model is validated for benchmark turbulent flows with swirl and curvature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document