scholarly journals Corresponding member of the USSR Academy of Sciences V. S. Troitskiy and his role in shaping the civic position of scientific community in Gorky region. 1985–1991

Author(s):  
A. A. Fomenkov ◽  

Ivan Nikiforovich Zavoloko (1897–1984) – a well-known figure of the Old Believer movement, historian, local historian, folklorist, collector of antiquities, educator, who had great authority both among the Old Believers and the scientific community. He actively collaborated with the Pushkin House and the Library of the USSR Academy of Sciences (BAN) in Leningrad in collecting manuscripts in the Baltic States and studying them. The published correspondence covers the period from 1972 to 1983 and includes 46 documents. Those are letters from I.N. Zavoloko to the curator of the manuscripts of the BAN N.Yu. Bubnov, to other employees of the Manuscript Department; and some response letters.


2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-61
Author(s):  
Aziz M. Muzafarov ◽  

Alexander Nikolaevich Nesmeyanov, one of the most underestimated presidents of the Academy of Sciences, was a great original-minded scientist who opened up organoelement chemistry to the world as an independent science and later on — an artificial food, to which the world turns again after several decades. These milestones of his biography are well known to scientific community, as well as his leadership of Moscow State University during the new complex construction on the Lenin Hills, creation of INEOS and VINITI. 10-years period of his biography, when he was a President of the USSR Academy of Sciences, is much less known. It was in this position that he manifested enormous talent as an organizer of the country's modern science management system, where the Academy of Sciences played an important role. Many thoughts and deeds of A.N. Nesmeyanov are especially relevant today.


Author(s):  
Valentina Korzun ◽  
Mihail Kovalev ◽  
Viktoriya Gruzdinskaya

The authors focus on the celebration of the 220th anniversary of the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1945. The festive events hosted both due to the anniversary, joyful victory and cease of warfare in Europe were attended by 124 delegates from 17 countries, as well as by nearly 1,000 Soviet academics. The situation was unique in its concept and inspired people with hope for world reconstruction. The occasion was widely publicized, eliciting an extensive response. The anniversary served an occasion to organize the forum where academics discussed their perception of science field in the victorious year of 1945. Based on a wide range of sources, including foreign archives first introduced to the academia, the paper presents the scenarios of the celebration of the 220th anniversary of the USSR Academy of Sciences, as well as the images of the Russian and Soviet science represented by the academic elite, and their perception by the international scientific community. The authors reveal the factors that influence the establishment and functioning of the communicative field of global science. It is concluded that in a contextual way the anniversary events featured the overestima­ted expectations of new forms of international cooperation, with various forms of collaboration being discussed. However, the triumph over the “unified science” and the establishment of the universal communicative field was temporary.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 550-559
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Yu. Samarin

The article introduces a previously unpublished speech of the outstanding Russian scientist-physicist, President of the USSR Academy of Sciences, academician Sergey Ivanovich Vavilov, which was delivered by him at the anniversary meeting held on June 5, 1949, at the monument to Alexander Pushkin in Moscow in connection with the celebration of the 150th anniversary of the great Russian poet’s birth. S.I. Vavilov was a great connoisseur of Pushkin’s poetry and literature about him. In the second half of the 1940s, Vavilov actively participated in projects to prepare the anniversary celebrations dedicated to Alexander Pushkin and perpetuate the memory of the poet. Analysis of S.I. Vavilov’s speech, which, unlike his other “Pushkin speeches”, was not intended for the press, shows that in evaluating the great poet’s work, along with the use of cliches, traditional for the epoch, the scientist also took certain liberties. In particular, he did not utter the ritual words praising Stalin, the Communist Party and the Soviet State. The poet Ya.P. Polonsky quoted by Vavilov was not among the classics recognized by Soviet literary criticism, and the selected quote from him could be interpreted as a hint of condemnation of the surrounding Stalinist reality. Numerous fragments of the scientist’s personal diaries indicate his critical attitude towards the latter, in particular.


1975 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 66-79
Author(s):  
V. A. Leshkovtsev

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-157
Author(s):  
E. S. Valishin ◽  
N. M. Vanov

The conference was dedicated to the 190th anniversary of the Department of Human Anatomy of Kazan State Medical University, the 100th anniversary of the birth of Corr. USSR Academy of Sciences, prof. N.G. Kolosov, and was also timed to coincide with the opening of the unique building of the Department of Anatomy after reconstructive capital repairs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document