Quantitative Paraspinal Muscle Measurements: Inter-Software Reliability and Agreement Using OsiriX and ImageJ

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 853-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryse Fortin ◽  
Michele C. Battié

Background Variations in paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and composition, particularly of the multifidus muscle, have been of interest with respect to risk of, and recovery from, low back pain problems. Several investigators have reported on the reliability of such muscle measurements using various protocols and image analysis programs. However, there is no standard protocol for tissue segmentation, nor has there been an investigation of reliability or agreement of measurements using different software. Objective The purpose of this study was to provide a detailed muscle measurement protocol and determine the reliability and agreement of associated paraspinal muscle composition measurements obtained with 2 commonly used image analysis programs: OsiriX and ImageJ. Design This was a measurement reliability study. Methods Lumbar magnetic resonance images of 30 individuals were randomly selected from a cohort of patients with various low back conditions. Muscle CSA and composition measurements were acquired from axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images of the multifidus muscle, the erector spinae muscle, and the 2 muscles combined at L4–L5 and S1 for each participant. All measurements were repeated twice using each software program, at least 5 days apart. The assessor was blinded to all earlier measurements. Results The intrarater reliability and standard error of measurement (SEM) were comparable for most measurements obtained using OsiriX or ImageJ, with reliability coefficients (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs]) varying between .77 and .99 for OsiriX and .78 and .99 for ImageJ. There was similarly excellent agreement between muscle composition measurements using the 2 software applications (inter-software ICCs=.81–.99). Limitations The high degree of inter-software measurement reliability may not generalize to protocols using other commercial or custom-made software. Conclusion The proposed method to investigate paraspinal muscle CSA, composition, and side-to-side asymmetry was highly reliable, with excellent agreement between the 2 software programs.

Neurosurgery ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 847-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyo Sub Jun ◽  
Ji Hee Kim ◽  
Jun Hyong Ahn ◽  
In Bok Chang ◽  
Joon Ho Song ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: The majority of earlier studies of the parameters of sagittal balance did not consider the influence of spinal muscles on spinal sagittal alignment. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between the paraspinal muscle (quantity and quality) and sagittal alignment in elderly patients. METHODS: We reviewed 50 full-spine lateral standing radiographs and lumbar magnetic resonance images of elderly patients at a single center. The radiographic parameters examined were thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and pelvic incidence (PI). The lumbar muscularity (LM; quantity) and fatty degeneration ratio (FD; quality) in the paraspinal muscle were measured at the L3 level on magnetic resonance images. The relationships between the parameters, LM, and FD were analyzed with the Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Pearson analysis demonstrated that the FD had significant correlations with age (r = 0.393), thoracic kyphosis (r = −0.559), pelvic tilt (r = 0.430), sagittal vertical axis (r = 0.488), and PI − LL (r = 0.479, P < .05), and a close negative correlation was found between the FD and LL (r = −0.505, P < .01). The LM had significant correlations with the LL (r = 0.342) and PI − LL (r = −0.283, P < .05). Regression models that controlled for confounding factors such as body mass index confirmed the correlations between the above parameters and FD (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The quality of the paraspinal muscle could be one of the various factors that influence sagittal balance.


Spine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 469-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard P. Bechara ◽  
Vikas Agarwal ◽  
John Boardman ◽  
Subashan Perera ◽  
Debra K. Weiner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document