A pilot study to see the effectiveness of high density spinal cord stimulation for intractable lumbar radiculopathty on virgin backs

Author(s):  
Georgina Wilson
2012 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 837 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.A. Pluijms ◽  
R Slangen ◽  
M Bakkers ◽  
C.G. Faber ◽  
I.S.J. Merkies ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 2765
Author(s):  
Yazi Al’joboori ◽  
Sarah J. Massey ◽  
Sarah L. Knight ◽  
Nick de N. Donaldson ◽  
Lynsey D. Duffell

Spinal cord stimulation may enable recovery of volitional motor control in people with chronic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). In this study we explored the effects of adding SCS, applied transcutaneously (tSCS) at vertebral levels T10/11, to a sit-to-stand training intervention in people with motor complete and incomplete SCI. Nine people with chronic SCI (six motor complete; three motor incomplete) participated in an 8-week intervention, incorporating three training sessions per week. Participants received either tSCS combined with sit-to-stand training (STIM) or sit-to-stand training alone (NON-STIM). Outcome measures were carried out before and after the intervention. Seven participants completed the intervention (STIM N = 5; NON-STIM N = 2). Post training, improvements in International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) motor scores were noted in three STIM participants (range 1.0–7.0), with no change in NON-STIM participants. Recovery of volitional lower limb muscle activity and/or movement (with tSCS off) was noted in three STIM participants. Unassisted standing was not achieved in any participant, although standing with minimal assistance was achieved in one STIM participant. This pilot study has shown that the recruitment of participants, intervention and outcome measures were all feasible in this study design. However, some modifications are recommended for a larger trial.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 891-893
Author(s):  
Evgeny N. Mikhaylov ◽  
Tatiana R. Moshonkina ◽  
Elena N. Zharova ◽  
Svetlana V. Garkina ◽  
Pavel D. Kovzelev ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 863-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen R. Schlaier ◽  
Peter Eichhammer ◽  
Berthold Langguth ◽  
Christian Doenitz ◽  
Harald Binder ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2921
Author(s):  
Lisa Goudman ◽  
Julie Jansen ◽  
Nieke Vets ◽  
Ann De Smedt ◽  
Maarten Moens

The increased awareness of discrepancies between self-reporting outcome measurements and objective outcome measurements within the field of neuromodulation has accelerated the search towards more objective measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an electronic nose can differentiate between chronic pain patients in whom Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) was activated versus deactivated. Twenty-seven patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) participated in this prospective pilot study. Volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath were measured with electronic nose technology (AeonoseTM) during SCS on and off states. Random forest was used with a leave-10%-out cross-validation method to determine accuracy of discriminating between SCS on and off states. Our random forest showed an accuracy of 0.56, with an area under the curve of 0.62, a sensitivity of 62% (95% CI: 41–79%) and a specificity of 50% (95% CI: 30–70%). Pain intensity scores were significantly different between both SCS states. Our findings indicate that we cannot discriminate between SCS off and on states based on exhaled breath with the AeonoseTM in patients with FBSS. In clinical practice, these findings imply that with a noninvasive electronic nose, exhaled breath cannot be used as an additional marker of the effect of neuromodulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document