A Review Paper on Big Data with comparative analysis of Hadoop

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-261
Author(s):  
Priya .
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Review Paper

Big Data Analytics Tools and Platform in Big Data Landscape

2018 ◽  
pp. 80-89
Author(s):  
Mohd Imran ◽  
Mohd Vasim Ahamad ◽  
Misbahul Haque ◽  
Mohd Shoaib
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Data Analytics ◽  
Big Data Analytics ◽  
Big Data Analysis ◽  
Apache Hadoop ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Analytical Tools

The term big data analytics refers to mining and analyzing of the voluminous amount of data in big data by using various tools and platforms. Some of the popular tools are Apache Hadoop, Apache Spark, HBase, Storm, Grid Gain, HPCC, Casandra, Pig, Hive, and No SQL, etc. These tools are used depending on the parameter taken for big data analysis. So, we need a comparative analysis of such analytical tools to choose best and simpler way of analysis to gain more optimal throughput and efficient mining. This chapter contributes to a comparative study of big data analytics tools based on different aspects such as their functionality, pros, and cons based on characteristics that can be used to determine the best and most efficient among them. Through the comparative study, people are capable of using such tools in a more efficient way.

Big Data Analytics Tools and Platform in Big Data Landscape

2022 ◽  
pp. 622-631
Author(s):  
Mohd Imran ◽  
Mohd Vasim Ahamad ◽  
Misbahul Haque ◽  
Mohd Shoaib
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Data Analytics ◽  
Big Data Analytics ◽  
Big Data Analysis ◽  
Apache Hadoop ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Analytical Tools

The term big data analytics refers to mining and analyzing of the voluminous amount of data in big data by using various tools and platforms. Some of the popular tools are Apache Hadoop, Apache Spark, HBase, Storm, Grid Gain, HPCC, Casandra, Pig, Hive, and No SQL, etc. These tools are used depending on the parameter taken for big data analysis. So, we need a comparative analysis of such analytical tools to choose best and simpler way of analysis to gain more optimal throughput and efficient mining. This chapter contributes to a comparative study of big data analytics tools based on different aspects such as their functionality, pros, and cons based on characteristics that can be used to determine the best and most efficient among them. Through the comparative study, people are capable of using such tools in a more efficient way.

Web Observatory Insights

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 52-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naif Radi Aljohani ◽  
Rabeeh Ayaz Abbasi ◽  
Fahad Mohammed Bawakid ◽  
Farrukh Saleem ◽  
Zahid Ullah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Deep Understanding ◽  
User Generated Content ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Privacy And Security ◽  
Common Practices ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Web

In the present era of Big Data, with continuously increasing amounts of user-generated content, it is becoming a challenge to understand the relation between the content that is available on the Web and the users who are generating that content. Researchers have come up with many ways to understand today's Web better. One of the recently introduced concepts is a Web observatory (WO). This article provides a deep understanding about web observatories. It discusses the status of existing WO systems. The article investigates and gathers the common practices of WOs. This research has implications for researchers and communities in the adoption of the WO concept. The article highlights the challenges of WOs, such as data crawling, privacy and security. It also provides future research and development directions. The article provides a comparative analysis of existing WOs. It discusses the architecture of WOs. It presents components of a WO in a coherent manner and finally provides insights into challenges and limitations of WOs.

scholarly journals When Relational-Based Applications Go to NoSQL Databases: A Survey

Information ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 241
Author(s):  
Geomar A. Schreiner ◽  
Denio Duarte ◽  
Ronaldo dos S. Melo
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Relational Databases ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Relational Data ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
System Architectures ◽  
Nosql Databases ◽  
State Of Art ◽  
Open Issues

Several data-centric applications today produce and manipulate a large volume of data, the so-called Big Data. Traditional databases, in particular, relational databases, are not suitable for Big Data management. As a consequence, some approaches that allow the definition and manipulation of large relational data sets stored in NoSQL databases through an SQL interface have been proposed, focusing on scalability and availability. This paper presents a comparative analysis of these approaches based on an architectural classification that organizes them according to their system architectures. Our motivation is that wrapping is a relevant strategy for relational-based applications that intend to move relational data to NoSQL databases (usually maintained in the cloud). We also claim that this research area has some open issues, given that most approaches deal with only a subset of SQL operations or give support to specific target NoSQL databases. Our intention with this survey is, therefore, to contribute to the state-of-art in this research area and also provide a basis for choosing or even designing a relational-to-NoSQL data wrapping solution.

scholarly journals Satellite-based land use mapping: comparative analysis of Landsat-8, Advanced Land Imager, and big data Hyperion imagery

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 026004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wasim Pervez ◽  
Vali Uddin ◽  
Shoab Ahmad Khan ◽  
Junaid Aziz Khan
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Big Data ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Landsat 8
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document