scholarly journals Morphofunctional state of the brain in chronic heart failure

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
N. S Akimova ◽  
I. M Sokolov ◽  
T. V Martynovich ◽  
Yu. G Shvarts
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
White Matter ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
The Brain

The aim of the study was to examine the dependence of functional and morphological changes in the brain and factors of the severity of chronic heart failure. Materials and methods: 54 patients with chronic heart failure of ischemic genesis, I-IV functional class were cognitive tests, echocardiography, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Results. With an increase in the functional class of chronic heart failure, the worst results of Veksler-5 and 7 cognitive subtests are noted, a smaller thickness of gray matter of parietal lobes, lower diffusion coefficients of water molecules in the white matter of the parietal and occipital lobes, and a smaller thickness of the middle legs of the cerebellum. Comparative analysis of the central nervous system state indices in patients with chronic heart failure with different fraction of left ventricular ejection did not show significant differences. The conclusion. The established results confirm the significance of the functional class of chronic heart failure as a marker of cognitive dysfunction and pathological changes in both gray and white matter of the brain, whereas the size of the left ventricular ejection fraction is obviously less useful in this respect.

Predictors of renal dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

2018 ◽  
Vol 0 (3) ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
L. G. Voronkov ◽  
G. E. Dudnik ◽  
A. V. Liashenko ◽  
T. I. Gavrilenko ◽  
L. S. Mkhitaryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Renal Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Recovery in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan

Cardiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (5) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Díez-Villanueva ◽  
Lourdes Vicent ◽  
Francisco de la Cuerda ◽  
Alberto Esteban-Fernández ◽  
Manuel Gómez-Bueno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Background: A significant number of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) experience ventricular function recovery during follow-up. We studied the variables associated with LVEF recovery in patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan (SV) in clinical practice. Methods: We analyzed data from a prospective and multicenter registry including 249 HF outpatients with reduced LVEF who started SV between October 2016 and March 2017. The patients were classified into 2 groups according to LVEF at the end of follow-up (>35%: group R, or ≤35%: group NR). Results: After a mean follow-up of 7 ± 0.1 months, 62 patients (24.8%) had LVEF >35%. They were older (71.3 ± 10.8 vs. 67.5 ± 12.1 years, p = 0.025), and suffered more often from hypertension (83.9 vs. 73.8%, p = 0.096) and higher blood pressure before and after SV (both, p < 0.01). They took more often high doses of beta-blockers (30.6 vs. 27.8%, p = 0.002), with a smaller proportion undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (14.8 vs. 29.0%, p = 0.028) and fewer implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICD; 32.8 vs. 67.9%, p < 0.001), this being the only predictive variable of NR in the multivariate analysis (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.47, p < 0.0001). At the end of follow-up, the mean LVEF in group R was 41.9 ± 8.1% (vs. 26.3 ± 4.7% in group NR, p < 0.001), with an improvement compared with the initial LVEF of 14.6 ± 10.8% (vs. 0.8 ± 4.5% in group NR, p < 0.0001). Functional class improved in both groups, mainly in group R (p = 0.035), with fewer visits to the emergency department (11.5 vs. 21.6%, p = 0.07). Conclusions: In patients with LVEF ≤35% treated with SV, not carrying an ICD was independently associated with LVEF recovery, which was related to greater improvement in functional class.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document