scholarly journals SEPARATE ISSUES OF PROVIDING LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN PROTECTING THE PUBLIC INTEREST

2020 ◽  
pp. 110-115
Author(s):  
Владимир Михайлович Андрианов
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
International Level ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Interest Law ◽  
National Legal System ◽  
Legal Costs ◽  
To Receive

Актуальность исследования обусловлена активизацией на международном уровне деятельности, связанной с защитой коллективных и групповых интересов, о чем свидетельствует целый ряд принятых международных актов. Указанное обстоятельство обусловливает необходимость введения соответствующих механизмов в национальную правовую систему. В статье предпринята попытка обратить внимание на особенности предоставления правовой помощи при защите общественного интереса, опираясь на зарубежный опыт. С учетом анализа научной литературы автор делает вывод, что на доктринальном уровне сформировалось два подхода к пониманию правовой категории «право общественного интереса»: широкий и узкий. Также указывается на необходимость решить ряд вопросов практического характера: определить субъектов, уполномоченных на ее предоставление, включая формы подтверждения их полномочий, а также лиц, имеющих право на ее получение и урегулировать особенности несения судебных расходов. The relevance of the study is due to the activation at the international level of activities related to the protection of collective and group interests, as evidenced by a number of adopted international acts. This circumstance necessitates the introduction of appropriate mechanisms into the national legal system. The article attempts to draw attention to the specifics of providing legal assistance in protecting public interest, based on foreign experience. Taking into account the analysis of scientific literature, the author concludes that at the doctrinal level, two approaches to understanding the legal category of «public interest law» have been formed: broad and narrow. It also points to the need to resolve a number of practical issues: to determine the entities authorized to provide it, including the forms of confirmation of their powers, as well as persons entitled to receive it and to settle the peculiarities of incurring legal costs.

Conclusion: SDO Decision-making and the Public Interest

2020 ◽  
pp. 210-237
Author(s):  
Alison Harcourt ◽  
George Christou ◽  
Seamus Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
International Level ◽  
Multiple Streams ◽  
Policy Entrepreneurship ◽  
Historical Representation ◽  
The Public ◽  
Decision Making Processes

The conclusion situates the book’s findings in academic debates on democracy and the Internet, global self-regulation, and civil society, and international decision-making processes in unstructured environments. It assesses whether current standards-developing organization (SDO) decision-making is able to bridge historical representation gaps and deficiencies. A nuanced pattern is emerging with increasing inclusion of a wider number of actors within SDO fora. The first part of the chapter returns to the Multiple Streams (MS) framework applied to the case studies on a comparative basis. It identifies key processes under which SDO rules of interaction are established at the international level and explains which interests have come to the fore within decision-making highlighting the occurrence of policy entrepreneurship, forum shopping, and coupling. The final part explores additional frameworks for SDO regulation where spaces for public interest consideration might occur in the future. These are opportunities for inserting public interest considerations into international and national Acts, certification programmes, and the move towards open source solutions for Internet management. The book concludes that, although the literature is expansive on the interaction of corporate sector actors within SDOs, the study of other actors, such as digital rights groups, civil society, academics, policy entrepreneurs and the technical community as a whole, has been underdressed in the literature on international self-regulatory fora to date. In this respect, the book raises important questions of representation of the public interest at the international level by having addressed the actions of actors within SDO fora who promote public interest goals.

Antitrust as Public Interest Law: Redistribution, Equity, and Social Justice

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-101
Author(s):  
Dina I. Waked
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Competition Policy ◽  
Private Property ◽  
Allocative Efficiency ◽  
Consumer Welfare ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Interest Law ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
History Of ◽  
Do So

This article proposes the use of antitrust law to reduce poverty and address inequality. It argues that the antitrust laws are sufficiently malleable to achieve such goals. The current focus of antitrust on the efficiency-only goals does not only lead to increasing inequality further but is also inconsistent with the history of antitrust. This history is presented through the lens of the public interest that emerges into the balance between private property and competition policy. Tracing the public interest at different historical moments, we get to see how it has been broad enough to encompass social welfare concerns. Over time, the public interest concern of antitrust was narrowed to exclusively cover consumer welfare and its allocative efficiency. Once we frame antitrust as public interest law, in its broadest sense, we are empowered to use it to address inequality. A proposal to do so is exposed in this article.

The Oxford Handbook of Political Representation in Liberal Democracies

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Political Representation ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Elites ◽  
International Level ◽  
Political Systems ◽  
Liberal Democracies ◽  
The Public ◽  
Nation States ◽  
Mass Publics

How can democracies effectively represent citizens? The goal of this Handbook is to evaluate comprehensively how well the interests and preferences of mass publics become represented by institutions in liberal democracies. It first explores how the idea and institutions of liberal democracies were formed over centuries and became enshrined in Western political systems. The contributors to this Handbook, made up of the world’s leading scholars on the various aspects of political representation, examine how well the political elites and parties who are charged with the representation of the public interest meet their duties. Clearly, institutions often fail to live up to their own representation goals. With this in mind, the contributors explore several challenges to the way that the system of representation is organized in modern democracies. For example, actors such as parties and established elites face rising distrust among electorates. Also, the rise of international problems such as migration and environmentalism suggests that the focus of democracies on nation states may have to shift to a more international level. All told, this Handbook illuminates the normative and functional challenges faced by representative institutions in liberal democracies.

scholarly journals Power to the People or the Profession? The Public Interest in Public Interest Law

1970 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar S. Cahn ◽  
Jean Camper Cahn
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Interest Law ◽  
The People

scholarly journals ANALISIS BANTUAN HUKUM MELALUI ARBITRASE SYARIAH DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH

PRANATA HUKUM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-198
Author(s):  
Muslih
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Poor People ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
Informal Justice ◽  
Banking Regulations ◽  
National Legal System

Legal aid had the meaning of access to justice, which was the ability of people to seek and obtain restoration of their rights only through formal and informal justice court. The provision of legal aid providers in Law Number 16 of 2011 was a guarantee of the constitutional rights for the person or group of people which were categorized as poor people. Political law was something which underlies the basic policy of the promulgation of a regulation and the basic policy of the enactment of a certain regulation in the national legal system. The regulation and enforcement of sharia banking regulations in Indonesia from a political perspective of Islamic law was to be understood worthily, the existence of sharia banking regulations in Indonesia currently strengthened the theory of positivism of Islamic law and strengthened the paradigm of prophetic legal in the national legal system. According to the authors, the regulations contained in Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning legal aid, the most important thing was to provide legal assistance as a tool in law enforcement and justice. The legal assistance can be carried out in existence when the subject of legal aid, law enforcers and law institutions of sharia arbitration (Basyarnas) was functioning properly. Occasionally, the political view of Islamic law which had the main objective was the formation of justice products based on the Qur'an, Al-Hadith, Ijma and Qias in the concept and practice levels. Then the implementation of Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning legal assistance by Shari'ah arbitration in resolving Islamic banking disputes, with clear processes or mechanisms and agreements, arbitration agreement clauses before or after related to the agreement from the beginning was to provide convenience in resolving banking disputes or non banking disputes.

Public Interest Law and the Public Interest Lawyer

2021 ◽  
pp. 166-184
Author(s):  
Lee Epstein ◽  
Tracey E. George ◽  
Joseph F. Kobylka
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Interest Law
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document