scholarly journals Accounting and Agent Development of Ukrainian Nationalists after Sentencing (on the Case of Letter Case No. 102 of the KGB of Zaporizhzhia Region)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (53) ◽  
pp. 191-196
Author(s):  
Yu. I. Schur ◽  
1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph L. Lifke ◽  
Ted A. Moore ◽  
J. Douglas ◽  
Robert E. Tapscott

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2478
Author(s):  
George N. Tzanakakis ◽  
Eirini-Maria Giatagana ◽  
Aikaterini Berdiaki ◽  
Ioanna Spyridaki ◽  
Kyoko Hida ◽  
...  

Bone sarcomas, mesenchymal origin tumors, represent a substantial group of varying neoplasms of a distinct entity. Bone sarcoma patients show a limited response or do not respond to chemotherapy. Notably, developing efficient chemotherapy approaches, dealing with chemoresistance, and preventing metastasis pose unmet challenges in sarcoma therapy. Insulin-like growth factors 1 and 2 (IGF-1 and -2) and their respective receptors are a multifactorial system that significantly contributes to bone sarcoma pathogenesis. Whereas failures have been registered in creating novel targeted therapeutics aiming at the IGF pathway, new agent development should continue, evaluating combinatorial strategies for enhancing antitumor responses and better classifying the patients that could best benefit from these therapies. A plausible approach for developing a combinatorial strategy is to focus on the tumor microenvironment (TME) and processes executed therein. Herewith, we will discuss how the interplay between IGF-signaling and the TME constituents affects sarcomas’ basal functions and their response to therapy. This review highlights key studies focusing on IGF signaling in bone sarcomas, specifically studies underscoring novel properties that make this system an attractive therapeutic target and identifies new relationships that may be exploited. Potential direct and adjunct therapeutical implications of the extracellular matrix (ECM) effectors will also be summarized.


1985 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 392-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lloyd L. Avant ◽  
Alice A. Thieman

2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 96-101
Author(s):  
Pavel Tichý ◽  
Petr Kadera ◽  
Raymond J. Staron ◽  
Pavel Vrba ◽  
Vladimír Mařík

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 418-430
Author(s):  
Marko-Luka Zubcic

Which epistemic value is the standard according to which we ought to compare, assess and design institutional arrangements in terms of their epistemic properties? Two main options are agent development (in terms of individual epistemic virtues or capabilities) and attainment of truth. The options are presented through two authoritative contemporary accounts-agent development by Robert Talisse?s understanding in Democracy and Moral Conflict (2009) and attainment of truth by David Estlund?s treatment, most prominently in Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework (2008). Both options are shown to be unsatisfactory because they are subject to problematic risk of suboptimal epistemic state lock-in. The ability of the social epistemic system to revise suboptimal epistemic states is argued to be the best option for a comparative standard in institutional epistemology.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzana L. Walcott ◽  
Jigar Patel ◽  
Ronald Lubet ◽  
Luz Rodriguez ◽  
Kathleen A. Calzone

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document