scholarly journals THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FAIR VALUE ON SHORT TERM ASSESMENT OF BIOLOGICAL ASSETS

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Murtianingsih Murtianingsih ◽  
Anas Hari Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
Market Value ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Managerial Decision ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Historical Cost ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Value Measurement ◽  
The Impact ◽  
International Accounting Standard

<p>This study aims to identify and analyze the implementation of fair value and the impact of the use of bases the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of the biological assets with the object of research PT. Malindo Feedmill Tbk which further research is also useful for agriculture companies in managerial decision making. This research is descriptive quantitative concluded based on data and clarify the picture of the implementation of fair value is based on International Accounting Standard (IAS) 41 and perform comparative measurements of biological assets PT. Malindo Feedmill, Tbk based acquisition price. From the results of this study concluded that the difference in the material due to fair value measurement that refers to IAS 41 in determining the market value following the fluctuations of the market, but in IAS 41 does not distinguish between fair value treatment against several categories of biological assets. This is certainly less relevant when applied to some types of biological assets, such as short term biological assets at PT. Malindo Feedmill Tbk.</p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>biological assets, fair value, historical cost, ias 41<strong></strong></p>

The Impact of IFRS 2 "Share-Based Payment" on Malaysian Companies

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 449-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruhaya Atan ◽  
Nur Syuhada Jasni ◽  
Yousef Shahwan
Keyword(s):  
Stock Options ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Employee Stock Options ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Corporate Scandals ◽  
Black Scholes ◽  
Compensation Plan ◽  
The Impact ◽  
International Accounting Standard

In the wake of corporate scandals and excessive stock options compensation, International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) has introduced a new accounting standard, IIFRS 2 Share-based Payments. The scope of the standard extends beyond payments to employees, but for the purpose of this study, the focus is only on 'employee stock options'. IIFRS 2 requires a fair value of stock options records calculated on grant date, and recognized as compensation expenses over vesting periods. Prior to the introduction of IIFRS 2, stock options were not recognized and were only disclosed in the notes to the accounts. In Malaysia, the standard is mandatory for all companies listed on or after January 1, 2006. This study assumes the requirement existed in 2003. This study examines the impact of stock options expenses from 2003 to 2005, on the top 100 Malaysian companies. The three year observations show at least 24% of the sample exceeds the 5% materiality threshold on diluted EPS. The sectors that are impacted the most are the Trade/Service and Finance sectors. From the multiple-regression test, this study finds that fair value of stock options have a negative relationship with dividend yields (input of the Black-Scholes Merton (BSM) Model). Most companies in the sample are found to pay dividends and grant stock options at the same time. Therefore, this study suggests that companies need to restructure their compensation plan thus balancing the stock options granted and dividends paid in the future.

scholarly journals Accounting For Agricultural Products: US Versus IFRS GAAP

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Treba Marsh ◽  
Mary Fischer
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
International Accounting ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Historical Cost ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
The Us ◽  
Accounting Recognition ◽  
International Accounting Standard

Currently there is a mix of accounting guidance for agriculture producers in the US that is both GAAP including Accounting Statement Codification 905 and non-GAAP financial guidelines. Should the US adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), this guidance would be replaced with International Accounting Standard (IAS) 41 Agriculture. This study identifies systematic differences between the US and International accounting and reporting for agricultural assets and products. The study also finds that international and US agricultural accounting recognition and reporting guidance result in dissimilar reporting due to guidance interpretation. Valuation variances and definition differences including the requirement to change the agricultural asset recognition method from historical cost to fair value continue to be the basis of major reporting differences. Current US guidance on recognizing and reporting agricultural assets is more conservative than the international guidance. Overall, the US agricultural recognition and reporting guidance contains less information and is therefore less beneficial to financial statement users.

scholarly journals METODE PENGUKURAN PROPERTI INVESTASI BERDASARKAN PSAK NOMOR 13 (ADOPSI IAS 40) VS US GAAP

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Habib Arizal Pratama ◽  
Abdul Kadir Usri
Keyword(s):  
Fair Value ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Historical Cost ◽  
Operating Profit ◽  
General Insurance ◽  
Method Of Measurement ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Us Gaap

<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br /><br />The measurement of property held to find out the value of property investment. There is a fair value method and cost method which based on PSAK13 (adoption of IAS 40) and historical cost which based on US GAAP to measure investment property. The purpose of this research is to know the difference in the application of method of measurement of investment property based on PSAK 13 (adoption of IAS 40) and US GAAP and to know the impact of the differences in comparison the application of the method of measurement based on property investment PSAK 13 (adoption IAS 40) and US GAAP against operating profit PT Lippo General Insurance, Tbk in 2013. This research is using a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were collected using document methods. Data analysis was done by means of measuring the property with all methods, both fair value method, cost method and historical cost method. After measured, measurement results are compared and summed up the application of the method where the most profitable PT Lippo General Insurance, Tbk. The results showed that there is a difference between fair value and cost method based on PSAK 13 (adoption of IAS 40) and the historical cost method based on US GAAP. Application of fair value method is to do repeated measurements without depreciate investment properties each year . Application of cost method is to do a revaluation and depreciate investment properties each year . While in application of the historical cost method is to depreciate the investment property without the ways are re-evaluated every year . By applying different measurement methods, it would have an impact on the value of investment properties, thenumber of operating profit and performance of PT Lippo General Insurance, Tbk. Based on the measurement of property investment with all those methods, method of measurement of investment properties that provide the greatest impact against the value of investment properties, the number of operating profit and the company’s performance is by applying fair value method.</p><p><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Pengukuran properti dilakukan untuk mengetahui nilai properti investasi. Terdapat metode nilai wajar dan metode biaya yang berdasarkan PSAK 13 (Adopsi IAS 40) dan metode nilai historis berdasarkan US GAAP untuk mengukur properti investasi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan penerapan metode pengukuran properti investasi berdasarkan PSAK 13 (Adopsi IAS 40) dan US GAAP dan untuk mengetahui dampak dari perbedaan perbandingan penerapan metode pengukuran properti investasi berdasarkan PSAK 13 (Adopsi IAS 40) dan US GAAP terhadap laba operasi PT Lippo General Insurance, Tbk pada tahun 2013. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif. Data dikumpulkan dengan metode dokumetasi. Analisis data dilakukan dengan cara mengukur properti dengan semua metode, baik metode nilai wajar, metode biaya maupun metode biaya historis. Setelah diukur, hasil pengukuran dibandingkan dan disimpulkan penerapan metode mana yang paling menguntungkan PT Lippo General Insurance, Tbk. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan antara metode biaya dan nilai wajar berdasarkan PSAK 13 (Adopsi IAS 40) dan metode biaya historis berdasarkan US GAAP. Penerapan metode nilai wajar adalah dengan melakukan pengukuran ulang tanpa mendepresiasi properti investasi setiap tahunnya. Penerapan metode biaya dalam melakukan pengukuran adalah dengan melakukan revaluasi dan mendepresiasi properti investasi setiap tahunnya. Sedangkan dalam penerapan metode biaya historis adalah dengan cara mendepresiasi properti investasi tanpa direvaluasi setiap tahunnya. Dengan menerapkan metode pengukuran yang berbeda, hal tersebut berdampak terhadap nilai properti investasi, jumlah laba operasi dan kinerja PT Lippo General Insurance, Tbk. Berdasarkan pengukuran properti investasi dengan semua metode, metode pengukuran properti investasi yang memberikan dampak terbesar terhadap nilai properti investasi, jumlah laba operasi dan kinerja perusahaan adalah dengan menerapkan metode nilai wajar.<strong><br /></strong></p>

scholarly journals Konsep Nilai Wajar (Fair Value) dalam Standar Akuntansi Berbasis IFRS di Indonesia Apa dan Bagaimana?

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Heri Sukendar W.
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Banking Industry ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Book Value ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
The Difference ◽  
International Accounting Standard

This paper is intended to explain the use of the concept of fair value instead of book value. The accounting world in Indonesia during the last few years have made convergency implementation of new accounting standards oriented to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by International Accounting Standard Boars (IASB). This new accounting standard that emphasizes the concept of fair value compared with book value concept is outdated. The use of the concept of fair value of the difference and it turned out to be a trigger konvergency change the paradigm of the book value of a simpler, but less information is less transparent. The implementation of accounting standards konverjensi done gradually raises serious problems, this can be seen from postponed the application of PSAK 50 & PSAK 55 in the banking industry. Knowledge and experience of inadequate is a priority of fair value implementation difficulties.

scholarly journals The Fair Value Measurement Challenges Faced by the External Auditor: Kurdistan Region -Iraq

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-100
Author(s):  
Firas N. Mardan
Keyword(s):  
Fair Value ◽  
Fair Value Accounting ◽  
External Auditors ◽  
Value Evaluation ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Important Challenge ◽  
External Auditor ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Value Measurement ◽  
The Impact

This study aimed to identify the most important challenges facing auditors when measuring fair value FVMs from three axes, namely identifying which challenges are most influencing auditors to direct attention towards them, and revealing the extent to which the inherent auditing risks are affected by fair value evaluation estimates. The third axis of this study raises discussions about the reliability of audit evidence relating to fair value and assures that disclosed and recognized fair values ​​are guiding values. The field study was applied to a sample of external auditors in the West Bank, where the researcher used the descriptive analytical approach in the field side and used the inductive approach to test the study hypotheses. The study found a set of results; the most important challenge facing the auditor in auditing fair value estimates is the lack of access to recent amendments to the international auditing standards for fair value accounting estimates. The study results also confirmed the impact of auditing risks with fair value estimates and measuring them at higher rates in many cases, including (the absence of active markets, the presence of significant misstatements, and the difference in the basis for measuring fair value).

The effect of accounting methods on financial reporting quality

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 1401-1411
Author(s):  
Andrain Hadiyanto ◽  
Evita Puspitasari ◽  
Erlane K. Ghani
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Palm Oil ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Financial Information ◽  
Financial Reporting Quality ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Historical Cost ◽  
Fair Value Measurement ◽  
Value Measurement

Purpose This study aims to examine the relationship between accounting measurement method of biological asset and financial reporting quality. Specifically, this study examines whether using fair value method or the historical cost method on biological asset provides different financial reporting quality. Design/methodology/approach This study uses data from 38 agricultural companies that are members of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. The annual reports of 38 companies from the Palm Oil Growers over a five-year period starting from 2011 to 2014 are analysed. Findings This study shows that companies using historical cost measurement produce less reliable and less relevant information compared to the companies that are using fair value measurement. Research limitations/implications The results in this study imply that the use of fair value measurement improves the quality of financial information. Practical implications This study supports IASB’s justification of developing IAS 41 as the principle-based standard that better represents the financial information related to biological asset and subsequently lead to good accountability and harmonisation practices. Originality/value This study provides evidence on the best measurement to be used in agriculture activities using a larger sample size of few countries. In addition, this study contributes to the existing literature on the effect of accounting methods on financial reporting quality.

scholarly journals IMPACT OF ADOPTING IFRS STANDARD ON THE EQUITY COST OF BRAZILIAN OPEN CAPITAL COMPANIES

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 85-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
RAFAEL CONFETTI GATSIOS ◽  
JOSÉ MARCOS DA SILVA ◽  
MARCELO AUGUSTO AMBROZINI ◽  
ALEXANDRE ASSAF NETO ◽  
FABIANO GUASTI LIMA
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Quality Of Accounting Information ◽  
Information Studies ◽  
Equity Cost ◽  
Mandatory Adoption ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Methodological Aspects ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Purpose: This study aims to assess the impact of adopting IFRS standard on the equity cost of Brazilian open capital companies in the period of 2004-2013. Originality/gap/relevance/implications: The adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards aims to increase the quality of accounting information. Studies performed in Europe suggest that, after the adoption of the IFRS standard, there was a reduction in the equity cost of companies due to the reduction of information asymmetry and risk. Key methodological aspects: The equity cost was calculated using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) adapted to the Brazilian case. The empirical strategy was the difference analysis in differences, comparing the results of companies that voluntarily adopted the IFRS with companies that adopted IFRS after the mandatory adoption period. Summary of key results: The results indicate that the adoption of the IFRS standard does not contribute to reduce the equity cost in Brazil. Key considerations/conclusions: Suggesting that the process of adopting the international accounting standard may take more time to impact the equity cost of Brazilian open capital companies, since the impact of IFRS is not related only with the adoption, but also with its use by companies and users.

scholarly journals The Impact of Switching from Short-Term Teriparatide Treatment to Denosumab Therapy Compared with Denosumab Alone for Patients with Osteoporotic Hip Fracture: A 1-Year Follow-up Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chan Ho Park ◽  
Jun-Il Yoo ◽  
Chang Hyun Choi ◽  
You-Sung Suh
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
T Score ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background: Switching the prescription from bone-forming medication to resorptive agents is reportedly effective for patients with severe osteoporosis. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of implementing short-term teriparatide (TPTD) intervention before denosumab (DMab) therapy compared with DMab therapy alone for 1 year after hip fracture.Methods: TPTD was administered to 24 patients for an average of 12.1 weeks after which the intervention was switched to DMab therapy for 12 months (group 1). DMab alone was administered to 16 patients for 12 months (group 2). Bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated before and after treatment at the 1-year follow-up. The improvement of BMD and T-score in hip and spine was compared with the levels of bone turnover marker.Results: The difference of hip BMD after osteoporosis treatment was -0.0081±0.03 in group 1 and 0.0074±0.04 in group 2 (p=0.180). The difference of spine BMD was 0.0819±0.04 in group 1 and 0.0145±0.03 in group 2 (p<0.001). BMD and T-score of the spine improved significantly in groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in C-terminal telopeptide and osteocalcin level. Conclusion: Short-term TPTD administration followed by DMab alone was effective only in improving spine BMD. Short-term treatment with TPTD caused mild improvement in femur neck BMD compared with DMab alone. However, further research with a longer duration of TPTD treatment is warranted, as our findings lack statistical significance.

Instructional Case: Worldwide Shipping Corporation Ltd: Early or Late Adoption of a New International Accounting Standard?

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-231
Author(s):  
Peter Lee ◽  
Pearl Tan
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Analysis ◽  
Balance Sheet ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
International Accounting ◽  
Accounting Choice ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
The Impact ◽  
International Accounting Standard

The management of Worldwide Shipping Corporation Ltd (hereafter “Worldwide Shipping”) is confronted with a dilemma when a new international accounting standard on leases is introduced which contains a transitional provision allowing firms to defer implementation for a period of four years. Students are required to put themselves in the position of managers who have to weigh the adverse impact of early adoption of the new accounting standard against a responsibility for fair financial reporting. Worldwide Shipping is a multifaceted case that can be used as an accounting case study or a financial analysis study. The objectives of the case are threefold. First, it aims to provide students with a better understanding of the impact of off-balance sheet transactions (in this case, sale-leaseback contracts) on a firm's financial statements. Second, it requires students to examine implications of accounting choice on management compensation and debt-contracting costs, as well as the perplexing problem of recognition in financial statements vs. footnote disclosures. By putting students in the position of managers, the case increases students' awareness of the possible economic consequences arising from accounting choice. Third, it provides students with a useful exercise in the mechanics of effecting a change in accounting method using the retroactive method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document