scholarly journals Traumatic Thoracic Aorta Injuries: Outcomes up to 15 years Post Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Varun J Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Type I ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Hand Ischemia ◽  
Aortic Injuries ◽  
Type I Endoleak

Background Aortic injuries are one of the leading causes of death following trauma, with a 75% pre-hospital and 50% in-hospital mortality. Endovascular repair is technically easier with fewer complications, but unproven in the long term. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent endovascular repair of thoracic aortic injuries from 2001-2018 at Liverpool Hospital. Primary endpoint was death, secondary endpoints were re-interventions, hand ischemia, access vessel repair, cardiopulmonary, neurological and ischemic complications. Results 24 patients, 10 female, most common mechanism was motor-vehicle injuries (75%) in Zone 3 (71%). Deployment was proximal (n=11), on (n=2) or distal (n=11) to the Left Subclavian Artery (LSCA). Average follow up 5.4 years ±5.1 years (Range 0.1-15.2 years), with 2 deaths. At <90 days, complications were hand ischemia (n=4, n=1 needing intervention), access vessel endarterectomy (n=1) and conversion to open bypass (n=1).  At >90 days, complications were hand ischemia needing intervention (n=1), bird-beaking (n=2) and minor graft thrombosis (n=1). Type I endoleak was the only statistically significant predictor of reintervention (RR 21.00, p=0.002) and hand ischemia (RR 4.7, p=0.02). Survival free from any complication in Zone 2 was 50% at less than 5 years; Zone 3 was 58.8% at 5 years, 42.9%at 10 and 15 years; Zone 4 was 100% at 5 years. Conclusions Endovascular repair for thoracic aortic injuries has low levels of mortality and morbidity. The LSCA can be covered without arm ischemia, and Type I endoleak carries high morbidity. At up to 15 years follow up, graft complications remain low. 

Homemade Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Complete Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Dissections

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludovic Canaud ◽  
Baris Ata Ozdemir ◽  
Lucien Chassin-Trubert ◽  
Julien Sfeir ◽  
Pierre Alric ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Covered Stent ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Fenestrated Stent Graft ◽  
Type I Endoleak

Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for complete endovascular aortic repair of aortic arch dissections. Materials and Methods: From July 2014 through September 2018, 35 patients (mean age 66±11 years; 25 men) underwent homemade fenestrated stent-graft repair of acute (n=16) or chronic (n=10) complicated type B aortic dissections (n=16) and dissecting aortic arch aneurysms subsequent to surgical treatment of acute type A dissections (n=9). Nineteen (54%) procedures were emergent. Results: Zone 2 single-fenestrated stent-grafts were used in 25 cases; the remaining 10 were double-fenestrated stent-grafts deployed in zone 0. Median time for stent-graft modification was 18 minutes (range 16–20). Technical success was achieved in all cases. An immediate distal type I endoleak was treated intraoperatively. Among the double-fenestrated stent-graft cases, the left subclavian artery fenestration could not be cannulated in 2 patients and revascularization was required. Partial coverage of the left common carotid artery necessitated placement of a covered stent in 3 cases. One (3%) patient had a stroke without permanent sequelae. Two type II endoleaks required additional covered stent placement at 5 and 7 days postoperatively, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 6% (2 patients with ruptured aortic arch aneurysm). During a mean follow-up of 17.6±13 months, there was no aortic rupture or retrograde dissection. One late type I endoleak was treated with additional proximal fenestrated stent-graft placement. One type II endoleak is currently under observation. One additional patient died (unrelated to the aorta); overall mortality was 9%. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. Conclusion: The use of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for endovascular repair of aortic arch dissections is feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up.

Treatment of a type Ia endoleak following EVAR using a custom-made inner branch device.

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110627
Author(s):  
Gino Gemayel GG ◽  
Michel Montessuit MM ◽  
Anouche Gemayel GA
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Type I ◽  
Novel Technology ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Aortic Cuff

Objectives We represent two cases of late proximal type I endoleak following EVAR with aneurysm expansion that were treated with a custom-made graft with inner branches. Methods Two patients of 87 and 82 years old were operated by EVAR 6 and 8 years ago for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Both had proximal type I endoleak with aneurysm sac expansion. Open surgery had a high risk, and a proximal aortic extension with a simple aortic cuff was not possible neither because previous EVAR grafts were already at the level of the renal arteries. A custom-made endograft with inner branches was planned as a fenestrated graft was not technically possible. Results We successfully treated both patients using a custom-made graft with four inner branches from Jotec (Cryolife, Kennesaw, GA). Three months’ follow-up CT scan did not show any endoleaks. All target vessels were patent with good conformability of the bridging stents. Conclusion The treatment of proximal type I endoleak using inner branches’ endografts is feasible. This novel technology might broaden the indications for complex aortic repair in a group of patients where fenestrated endografts are not possible.

Real-World Experience with Type I Endoleaks after Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 599-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Adams ◽  
Margaret C. Tracci ◽  
Sahir Sabri ◽  
Kenneth J. Cherry ◽  
John F. Angle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Natural History ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Spontaneous Resolution ◽  
Type I ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
History Of ◽  
Aortic Pathologies ◽  
Initial Results

Endoleaks are a frequent complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and will likely increase in incidence with application of the technique to more complicated aortic anatomy and a wider range of thoracic aortic pathologies. Management generally consists of aggressive repair of Type I endoleaks; however, the natural history of Type I endoleaks after TEVAR remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence and characteristics of Type I endoleaks and to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with Type I endoleaks after TEVAR. A single-center retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent TEVAR over a 4-year period. Type I endoleaks were detected in 21 per cent (27 of 129) of patients on post-deployment aortography or CT angiography. During a mean follow-up of 750.63 ± 483 days, 59 per cent (16 of 27) closed spontaneously; 30 per cent (eight of 27) required secondary endovascular intervention; and 11 per cent (three of 27) have persisted with no increase in maximum aortic diameter. No patients have died or required open surgical conversion as a result of their Type I endoleak. Although accurate predictors of spontaneous resolution of Type I endoleaks have yet to be definitively characterized, our initial results suggest that it may be safe to observe small Type I endoleaks given that a large percentage resolve spontaneously and no endoleak-related deaths have occurred.

Secondary Procedures Following Iliac Branch Device Treatment of Aneurysms Involving the Iliac Bifurcation: The pELVIS Registry

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos P. Donas ◽  
Mirjam Inchingolo ◽  
Piergiorgio Cao ◽  
Carlo Pratesi ◽  
Giovanni Pratesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Specific Treatment ◽  
The Other ◽  
Type I ◽  
Iliac Arteries ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Secondary Procedures ◽  
Sealing Zone ◽  
Crossover Bypass ◽  
Iliac Bifurcation

Purpose: To evaluate the incidence and reasons for secondary procedures in patients treated with iliac branch devices (IBDs) for isolated iliac aneurysm or aortoiliac aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation. Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2015, 575 surgical-high-risk patients (mean age 72.0±8.4 years; 558 men) with isolated iliac aneurysms (n=79) or aortoiliac aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation (n=496) were treated with placement of 650 ZBIS or Gore IBDs (75 bilateral) in 6 European centers. The primary outcome was procedure-related reinterventions for occlusion or high-grade (>70%) stenosis of the bridging device, occlusion of the ipsilateral common or external iliac artery (EIA), type I/III endoleak, rupture, or infection following IBD implantation. Clinical and radiological data were analyzed based on preset definitions of comorbidities, aneurysm morphology, intraoperative variables, and follow-up strategies. Results: Nine (1.6%) reinterventions were performed within 30 days for occlusion or endoleak. Among 10 (1.5%) occluded EIAs ipsilateral to a deployed IBD, 6 underwent a reintervention with additional stent placement after thrombolysis (n=4) or a femorofemoral or iliofemoral crossover bypass (n=2). Three of 14 patients with early type I endoleak had a reintervention for an insufficient proximal sealing zone (stent-grafts in 2 common iliac arteries and 1 bifurcated endograft). Mean clinical and radiological follow-up were 32.6±9.9 and 29.8±21.1 months, respectively. Forty-two (7.3%) patients underwent reinterventions in the follow-up period. The overall postoperative reintervention rate was 8.9%. Both external and common iliac segments occluded in 30 (4.6%) IBDs; 2 patients had a crossover bypass and 14 were treated with endovascular techniques. In the other 14 patients, no specific treatment was performed. Seven (1.2%) patients with isolated EIA occlusion were treated during follow-up. Nineteen of the overall 28 patients with type I endoleak underwent endovascular repair. The other 9 were under radiological surveillance due to less significant (<5 mm) sac increase. No reintervention was performed to recanalize 11 (1.6%) occluded internal iliac arteries. Conclusion: Midterm experience with placement of IBDs is associated with a low incidence of secondary procedures due to type I endoleaks and occlusions. The main reasons for reinterventions seem to be short proximal sealing zone and poor conformability of the ZBIS device in elongated EIAs.

Type IIIb Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using the Zenith Stent Graft

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 515-519
Author(s):  
Toshiya Nishibe ◽  
Toru Iwahashi ◽  
Kentaro Kamiya ◽  
Masaki Kano ◽  
Keita Maruno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aneurysm Rupture ◽  
Type I ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
System Type ◽  
Type Iiib ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

We present 3 cases of type IIIb endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Zenith stent graft system. Type III endoleak, like type I endoleak, is a high-pressure, high-risk leak that increases sac pressure up to or even above arterial pressure, and is associated with an increased frequency of open conversions or risk of aneurysm rupture. Type IIIb endoleak is rare but there is much concern that the incidence of type IIIb endoleak is likely to increase hereafter; the mechanism of type IIIb endoleak is deterioration of graft fabric in conjunction with stent sutures. Type IIIb endoleak is difficult to diagnose before rupture. The possibility of type IIIb endoleak should be highly suspected when the continued growth of an excluded aneurysm sac without direct radiologic evidence is observed during follow-up. Type IIIb endoleak can be repaired by relining of the stent graft with additional stent grafts.

scholarly journals Late open conversion after endovascular repair of abdominal aneurysm failure: Better and easier option than complex endovascular treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 204800401775283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Bonardelli ◽  
Franco Nodari ◽  
Maurizio De Lucia ◽  
Emanuele Botteri ◽  
Alice Benenati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Multiple Organ ◽  
Type I ◽  
Abdominal Aneurysm ◽  
Open Conversion ◽  
Technical Errors ◽  
Report Data

Aim Conversion to open repair becomes the last option in case of endovascular repair of abdominal aneurysm failure, when radiological interventional procedures are unfeasible. While early conversion to open repair generally derives from technical errors, aetiopathogenesis and results of late conversion to open repair often remain unclear. Methods We report data from our Institute’s experience on late conversion to open repair. Twenty-two late conversion to open repairs out of 435 consecutive patients treated during a 18 years period, plus two endovascular repair of abdominal aneurysms performed in other centres, are analysed. The indication for conversion to open repair was aneurysm enlargement because of type I, type III, type II endoleak and endotension. Even if seven cases (23%) had shown an initial aneurysmal shrinkage, in a later phase, the sac began to enlarge again. In 12 patients, conversion to open repair was the last chance after unsuccessful secondary endovascular procedures. Results Three cases (12.5%) were treated in emergency. Aortic cross-clamping was only infrarenal in 10 cases, only or temporarily suprarenal in 14 and temporarily supraceliac in 9 cases, for 19 total and 5 partial endograft excisions. Two patients died for Multiple Organ Failure (MOF), on 42nd (endovascular repair of abdominal aneurysm infection) and 66th postoperative day. No other conversion to open repair-related deaths or major complications were revealed by follow-up post-conversion to open repair (mean: 68 months ranging from 24 to 180 months). Conclusion Late conversion to open repair is often an unpredictable event. It represents a technical challenge: specifically, the most critical point is the proximal aortic clamping that often temporarily excludes the renal circulation. In our series, conversion to open repair can be performed with a low rate of complications. In response to an endovascular repair of abdominal aneurysm failure, before applying complex procedures of endovascular treatment, conversion to open repair should be taken into account.

Early Computed Tomographic Angiography after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Worthwhile or Worthless?

Vascular ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evert J. Waasdorp ◽  
Joost A. van Herwaarden ◽  
Rob H.W. van de Mortel ◽  
Frans L. Moll ◽  
Jean-Paul P.M. de Vries
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Computed Tomographic Angiography ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Tomographic Angiography ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

This study evaluated the value of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) early after an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in relation to CTA 3 months after EVAR. We retrospectively reviewed all elective EVAR patients with available postprocedural and 3-month follow-up CTAs who were treated between 1996 and 2006. CTAs were analyzed for EVAR-related complications in terms of endoleaks, migration, and stent graft thrombosis. Secondary procedures and other complications within a 4-month time interval after EVAR were noted and analyzed for any association with the postprocedural CTA. During the study period, 291 patients (275 men), with a mean age of 71 years, underwent elective EVAR. All had postprocedural and 3-month follow-up CTAs, which detected 93 (32%) endoleaks (8 type I, 84 type II, 1 type III) and 1 stent graft thrombosis. These findings resulted in four secondary interventions (one interposition cuff, two extension cuffs, one conversion). All reinterventions were successfully done in an elective setting. During the first 3 postoperative months, five other reinterventions were required for acute ischemia in four patients (three Fogarty procedures, one femorofemoral crossover bypass) or groin infection in one patient. Eight patients died, but none of the deaths were related to abdominal aortic aneurysm or EVAR (four cardiac, two pulmonary, one gastric bleeding, one carcinoma). At 3 months, 43 endoleaks (3 type I, 40 type II), 3 stent graft thromboses, and 1 stent graft migration were seen. In two patients (0.7%), a new endoleak was diagnosed compared with the postprocedural CTAs. In 287 (99%) of 291 patients, the postprocedural CTA did not influence our treatment policy in the first 3 months after EVAR. More than half of the early endoleaks were self-limiting, and new endoleaks were seen in only two patients (< 1%) at the 3-month follow-up CTA. After an uneventful EVAR procedure, it is safe to leave out the early postprocedural CTA.

Total Endovascular Repair With Parallel Stent-Grafts for Postdissection Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm After Prior Proximal Repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 668-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjun Liu ◽  
Zhenjiang Li ◽  
Jiaxuan Feng ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
Zhiqing Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Spinal Cord Ischemia ◽  
Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Stent Grafts

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of total endovascular repair with parallel stent-grafts for postoperative residual dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was undertaken of 21 patients (mean age 64.0±12.5 years; 17 men) undergoing total endovascular therapy with parallel stent-grafts for postdissection TAAA after prior proximal repair between 2014 and 2016. The preoperative minimum true lumen diameter was 12.3±4.8 mm and the mean extent of dissection was 248.1±48.2 mm. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative medical records were reviewed to assess technical success, spinal cord ischemia, patency of target branch arteries, endoleak, and short-term outcomes of this approach. Results: Technical success was achieved in 17 of 21 patients owing to 4 type I endoleaks at the end of the procedures. A total of 70 branch arteries were revascularized and 14 celiac trunks were covered intentionally without reconstruction. Of 7 intraoperative endoleaks, 2 were managed intraoperatively and 5 (4 type I and 1 type II) disappeared spontaneously within 1 month. No spinal cord or abdominal organ or limb ischemia was observed. Mean follow-up was 16.2±6.1 months. No death or type I or III endoleak occurred during the follow-up; 2 type II endoleaks were observed. Nineteen of the 21 false lumens thrombosed, and the total aortic diameter decreased (57.3±8.4 to 55.3±7.4 mm, p<0.01). Three (4.3%) of 70 target branch arteries occluded during follow-up. The cumulative patency of retrogradely and antegradely revascularized branch arteries was 97.3% vs 100% at 12 months and 91.2% vs 100% at 18 months. Conclusion: Total endovascular therapy with parallel stent-grafts could be an effective alternative in treating postdissection TAAA. Further studies with long-term follow-up and larger sample size are recommended to evaluate the technique.

Uncovered Chimney Stent Graft for Renal Arteries With the Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Technique

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Garriboli ◽  
Antonio Maria Jannello
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Type I ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Vessel Patency ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Procedural Costs ◽  
Endovascular Approach ◽  
Access Complications

Purpose: To describe the application of uncovered chimney stent grafts with the Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing technique (ChEVAS) for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JAAAs). Case Report: Two patients with JAAA and multiple comorbidities were considered unfit for open surgery and were selected for an endovascular approach. Fenestrated and branched endografts were too expensive, and a chimney endovascular approach was considered inappropriate for the relatively high incidence of proximal type I endoleak and graft migration. ChEVAS was performed successfully with the novel addition of uncovered chimney stents to further reduce costs and possibly improve target vessel patency. JAAA exclusion and visceral vessel patency was confirmed at 18-month follow-up. Conclusion: ChEVAS with bare chimney stents is technically less complex, potentially reduces access complications and procedural costs, and may improve long-term patency compared to alternative techniques. Results at 18 months seem promising, but strict follow-up is necessary as the long-term durability is unknown.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document