scholarly journals Physiological Observations and Nursing Interventions in the Pre-Arrest Patient: A Descriptive Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Tara Marie Ryton-Malden

<p>Aim: To identify how nurses respond to abnormal physiological observations in the 12 hours prior to a patient having a cardiac arrest. Methods: A descriptive observational design was used to retrospectively review the observation charts and nursing notes of 28 patients who had an in-hospital cardiac arrest, during a 20 month period. This study was performed in a large, tertiary teaching hospital in New Zealand. Key Findings Only one patient met the hospitals minimum standard of four hourly observations and a full set of vital signs were performed on only three patients. The nursing responses were limited to increasing the frequency of observations or informing the doctor. There were few other interventions to treat the abnormality. Eight (32%) patients who had either no response or a partial response to their abnormal physiology did not survive. The nursing documentation demonstrated that abnormal neurological observations were tolerated for significant periods of time and were not acted upon in 62% of these patients. The nursing documentation revealed that the delivery of oxygen was often insufficient to meet the patient's requirements and the medical staff were aware of less than half the patients with abnormal physiology. Discussion removed statement re pt survival: This research identified major deficiencies with recording patient vital signs. If these are not recorded regularly, patient deterioration will be missed and treatment cannot be initiated. Nurses need to respond to abnormal physiology beyond repeating vital signs and informing the medical staff. They are accountable for initiating interventions to prevent further deterioration. Conclusion: The early recognition of patient deterioration and treatment are essential to prevent cardiac arrest. Education strategies are required to improve compliance with recording patient vital signs, communication between nursing and medical staff and how to respond to patient deterioration. The barriers to these must be addressed and solutions sought if patient mortality is to be improved.</p>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Tara Marie Ryton-Malden

<p>Aim: To identify how nurses respond to abnormal physiological observations in the 12 hours prior to a patient having a cardiac arrest. Methods: A descriptive observational design was used to retrospectively review the observation charts and nursing notes of 28 patients who had an in-hospital cardiac arrest, during a 20 month period. This study was performed in a large, tertiary teaching hospital in New Zealand. Key Findings Only one patient met the hospitals minimum standard of four hourly observations and a full set of vital signs were performed on only three patients. The nursing responses were limited to increasing the frequency of observations or informing the doctor. There were few other interventions to treat the abnormality. Eight (32%) patients who had either no response or a partial response to their abnormal physiology did not survive. The nursing documentation demonstrated that abnormal neurological observations were tolerated for significant periods of time and were not acted upon in 62% of these patients. The nursing documentation revealed that the delivery of oxygen was often insufficient to meet the patient's requirements and the medical staff were aware of less than half the patients with abnormal physiology. Discussion removed statement re pt survival: This research identified major deficiencies with recording patient vital signs. If these are not recorded regularly, patient deterioration will be missed and treatment cannot be initiated. Nurses need to respond to abnormal physiology beyond repeating vital signs and informing the medical staff. They are accountable for initiating interventions to prevent further deterioration. Conclusion: The early recognition of patient deterioration and treatment are essential to prevent cardiac arrest. Education strategies are required to improve compliance with recording patient vital signs, communication between nursing and medical staff and how to respond to patient deterioration. The barriers to these must be addressed and solutions sought if patient mortality is to be improved.</p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
pp. 309-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilana Sebbag ◽  
Maria Jose Carvalho Carmona ◽  
Maria Margarita Castro Gonzalez ◽  
Hermes Marcel Alcantara ◽  
Rolison Gustavo Bravo Lelis ◽  
...  

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Although advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques have reduced perioperative morbidity-mortality, the survival rate following cardiac arrest remains low. The aim of this study was to evaluate, over the course of one year, the prevalence of intraoperative cardiac arrest and the 30-day survival rate after this event in a tertiary teaching hospital. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study in a tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: Following approval by the institutional ethics committee, anesthetic procedures and cases of intraoperative cardiac arrest between January and December 2007 were evaluated. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery were excluded. The data were gathered prospectively using the modified Utstein model, with evaluation of demographic data, pre-arrest conditions, intraoperative care, care during arrest and postoperative outcome up to the 30th day. The data were recorded by the attending anesthesiologist. RESULTS: During the study period, 40,379 anesthetic procedures were performed, and 52 cases of intraoperative cardiac arrest occurred (frequency of 13:10,000). Among these, 69% presented spontaneous return of circulation after the initial arrest, and only 25% survived for 30 days after the event. The following factors were associated with shorter survival: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status IV and V, emergency surgery, hemorrhagic events, hypovolemia as the cause of arrest and use of atropine during resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the frequency of cardiac arrest in the surgical environment has declined and resources to attend to this exist, the survival rate is low. Factors associated with worst prognosis are more frequent in critical patients.


2006 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 060606032719028 ◽  
Author(s):  
LEANDRO GOBBO BRAZ ◽  
JOSE REINALDO CERQUEIRA BRAZ ◽  
NORMA SUELI PINHEIRO MODOLO ◽  
PAULO DO NASCIMENTO ◽  
BRUNO AUGUSTO MOURA BRUSHI ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e104041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juscimar C. Nunes ◽  
Jose R. C. Braz ◽  
Thais S. Oliveira ◽  
Lidia R. de Carvalho ◽  
Yara M. M. Castiglia ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e90125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo T. O. Carlucci ◽  
José R. C. Braz ◽  
Paulo do Nascimento ◽  
Lidia R. de Carvalho ◽  
Yara M. M. Castiglia ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Dwyer ◽  
John McNeil

Clinical Registries are established to provide a clinically credible means for monitoring and benchmarking healthcare processes and outcomes, to identify areas for improvement, and drive strategies for improving patient care. Clinical Registries are used to assess changes in clinical practice, appropriateness of care and health outcomes over time. The American Heart Association Policy Statement in April 2011 called for expanding the application for existing and future Clinical Registries, with well-designed Clinical Registry programs. Concurrently, in Australia, and similarly within the United States and United Kingdom, there has been an increased focus on performance measurement for quality and patient safety. Within Victoria, the Victorian Clinical Governance Policy Framework outlines clinical effectiveness as one of the four domains of Clinical Governance As Clinical Registries evaluate effectiveness and safety of patient care by measuring patient outcomes compared with peers, the use of Clinical Registries data to improve a health service’s quality of care seems intuitive. A mixed methods approach was utilised, involving (1) semi-structured interviews and (2) documentation audit in this study conducted at Austin Health, a major tertiary teaching hospital in North-Eastern metropolitan Melbourne, affiliated with the University of Melbourne and various research institutes within Austin LifeSciences. Although many studies have highlighted the benefits of data collected via individual Clinical Registries, [5,6] the level of voluntary medical staff participation in Clinical Registries at a health service level is yet to be established. The aim of this study was to document the level of medical staff involvement for Clinical Registries within a major tertiary teaching hospital, and the level of reporting into Quality Committees within the organisation. This study demonstrates that along with a very high level of medical staff participation in Clinical Registries, there is a lack of systematic reporting of Registries data into quality committees beyond unit level, and utilisation of such data to reflect upon practice and drive quality improvement. Abbreviations: CREPS – Centre for Excellence in Patient Safety; CSU – Clinical Services Unit; HOU – Heads of Unit; VASM – Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document