scholarly journals Phenotyping of obstructive airways disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
James Fingleton

<p>Background  Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) are heterogeneous disorders which may be made up of different sub-types, or phenotypes, of airflow obstruction with distinct clinical characteristics. To facilitate personalised treatment the different phenotypes and their response to treatment must be clearly defined and sound diagnostic rules developed.  In this thesis I explore the evidence supporting candidate phenotypes and report the results of my research, known as the New Zealand Respiratory Health Survey (NZRHS). The NZRHS was designed to determine candidate phenotypes, compare these phenotypes to those previously described, characterize their response to inhaled medication, and develop a method for allocating patients to the most appropriate phenotype.  Research Aims  -To explore clinical phenotypes of chronic airways disease by cluster analysis. -To examine if phenotypes identified by a previous cluster analysis exist in the independent NZRHS sample. -To compare the response to a short-acting beta-agonist inhaler between phenotype groups. -To compare the response to a short-acting muscarinic antagonist inhaler between phenotype groups. -To compare the response to an inhaled corticosteroid between phenotype groups. -To generate allocation rules and determine their predictive value for the different disorders of airways disease.  Conclusions  This research has identified phenotypes of airways disease that differ significantly in their clinical and pathophysiological characteristics. Evidence is presented to support the existence of the asthma/COPD overlap and obesity/co-morbid phenotypes and provide data of their responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroid, beta agonist and anti-muscarinic treatments, which may guide future management of patients with these phenotypes of obstructive airways disease.</p>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
James Fingleton

<p>Background  Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) are heterogeneous disorders which may be made up of different sub-types, or phenotypes, of airflow obstruction with distinct clinical characteristics. To facilitate personalised treatment the different phenotypes and their response to treatment must be clearly defined and sound diagnostic rules developed.  In this thesis I explore the evidence supporting candidate phenotypes and report the results of my research, known as the New Zealand Respiratory Health Survey (NZRHS). The NZRHS was designed to determine candidate phenotypes, compare these phenotypes to those previously described, characterize their response to inhaled medication, and develop a method for allocating patients to the most appropriate phenotype.  Research Aims  -To explore clinical phenotypes of chronic airways disease by cluster analysis. -To examine if phenotypes identified by a previous cluster analysis exist in the independent NZRHS sample. -To compare the response to a short-acting beta-agonist inhaler between phenotype groups. -To compare the response to a short-acting muscarinic antagonist inhaler between phenotype groups. -To compare the response to an inhaled corticosteroid between phenotype groups. -To generate allocation rules and determine their predictive value for the different disorders of airways disease.  Conclusions  This research has identified phenotypes of airways disease that differ significantly in their clinical and pathophysiological characteristics. Evidence is presented to support the existence of the asthma/COPD overlap and obesity/co-morbid phenotypes and provide data of their responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroid, beta agonist and anti-muscarinic treatments, which may guide future management of patients with these phenotypes of obstructive airways disease.</p>


Respiration ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Hyun Woo Lee ◽  
Hyung Jun Kim ◽  
Eun Jin Jang ◽  
Chang-Hoon Lee

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Various combinations of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), and long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) have been used as triple therapy for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). <b><i>Objective:</i></b> Our study was conducted to answer whether there were significant differences among various combinations in efficacy, for reducing exacerbation or mortality, and in safety, for increasing cardiovascular events or pneumonia. <b><i>Method:</i></b> We searched parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICS/LAMA/LABA with other inhaled drugs in patients with stable COPD for at least 12 weeks in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registries from inception to December 31, 2019. We conducted a network meta-analysis with Bayesian statistics using a random-effects model with heterogeneous variance structure (PROSPERO, CRD42019126757). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Nine different combinations of ICS/LAMA/LABA were identified in 21 RCTs containing 29,892 patients with moderate to very severe COPD. We could not find any significant evidence suggesting a better treatment for reducing total exacerbations or all-cause mortality among ICS/LAMA/LABA combinations. There were also no significant differences in moderate to severe exacerbation, COPD-related mortality, or cardiovascular disease-related mortality among ICS/LAMA/LABA combinations, and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was not different. A significantly lower risk of pneumonia was found in fluticasone propionate (FP)/glycopyrrolate/salmeterol (SAL) than FP/tiotropium/SAL {median odds ratio [OR] (95% credible interval [CrI]) = 0 [0–0.72]} and FP/umeclidinium/SAL {median OR (95% Crl) = 0 [0–0.97]}. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes, including acute exacerbation and all-cause mortality among various ICS/LAMA/LABA combinations in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document