scholarly journals “A Convenient Ventriloquist’s Dummy”: The “Christopher Isherwood” Character in Christopher Isherwood

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Oliver Kavanagh Penno

<p>The “Christopher Isherwood” character first appears in Lions and Shadows (1938), Christopher Isherwood’s lightly fictionalised autobiography. Its foreword claims that “Isherwood” is merely a “guinea-pig” and asks us to read Lions and Shadows “as a novel” (xv). In the foreword to Goodbye to Berlin (1939), the author distances himself from his namesake once again: “‘Christopher Isherwood’ is a convenient ventriloquist’s dummy, nothing more” (np). This thesis examines Christopher Isherwood’s relationship with the “Christopher Isherwood” character in five texts: Lions and Shadows, Goodbye to Berlin, Prater Violet (1945), Down There on a Visit (1962), and Christopher and His Kind (1976). In doing so, I attempt to answer the question, ‘what happens when Christopher Isherwood gives his name to the narrator of his fiction?’  The second paragraph of Goodbye to Berlin begins, “I am a camera with its shutter open, quite passive, recording, not thinking” (1). The critical consensus is that this paragraph is indicative of a namesake narrator who acts as a detached observer, withholding judgment, existing only as a vessel through which the story can be told. I maintain, however, that as Isherwood and “Isherwood” have the same name, we are compelled to compare and contrast the two. Isherwood’s biographer, Peter Parker, claims that “Isherwood liked to imagine himself his own creation” (np). Through his construction of “Isherwood,” Isherwood creates a self – one that does not pre-exist his texts.  Isherwood’s novels anticipate a new kind of autobiographical writing, transparent and aware in their fictionality, four decades before it is formally recognised as a genre; while contemporary writers all over the world are now publishing autofiction more than ever before, there was a writer, alone the English island in the 1930s who preceded them all. His name, and his character, is Christopher Isherwood.</p>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Oliver Kavanagh Penno

<p>The “Christopher Isherwood” character first appears in Lions and Shadows (1938), Christopher Isherwood’s lightly fictionalised autobiography. Its foreword claims that “Isherwood” is merely a “guinea-pig” and asks us to read Lions and Shadows “as a novel” (xv). In the foreword to Goodbye to Berlin (1939), the author distances himself from his namesake once again: “‘Christopher Isherwood’ is a convenient ventriloquist’s dummy, nothing more” (np). This thesis examines Christopher Isherwood’s relationship with the “Christopher Isherwood” character in five texts: Lions and Shadows, Goodbye to Berlin, Prater Violet (1945), Down There on a Visit (1962), and Christopher and His Kind (1976). In doing so, I attempt to answer the question, ‘what happens when Christopher Isherwood gives his name to the narrator of his fiction?’  The second paragraph of Goodbye to Berlin begins, “I am a camera with its shutter open, quite passive, recording, not thinking” (1). The critical consensus is that this paragraph is indicative of a namesake narrator who acts as a detached observer, withholding judgment, existing only as a vessel through which the story can be told. I maintain, however, that as Isherwood and “Isherwood” have the same name, we are compelled to compare and contrast the two. Isherwood’s biographer, Peter Parker, claims that “Isherwood liked to imagine himself his own creation” (np). Through his construction of “Isherwood,” Isherwood creates a self – one that does not pre-exist his texts.  Isherwood’s novels anticipate a new kind of autobiographical writing, transparent and aware in their fictionality, four decades before it is formally recognised as a genre; while contemporary writers all over the world are now publishing autofiction more than ever before, there was a writer, alone the English island in the 1930s who preceded them all. His name, and his character, is Christopher Isherwood.</p>


AJS Review ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-171
Author(s):  
Gidon Rothstein

Marc Shapiro puts an explicit contemporary context on this remarkable collection of sources that disagreed with one part or other of Maimonides' Thirteen Principles—the beliefs Maimonides asserted were absolutely necessary to be considered a believing Jew and to attain the World to Come. By showing the extent to which past authors disagreed with those Principles, Shapiro seeks to debunk assertions by contemporary writers that place those Principles at the core of Orthodox belief.


Author(s):  
Kelly Michael Hilderbrand ◽  
Sutheera Sritrakool

This article is an attempt to compare and contrast biblical divine council cosmology (Heiser, 2008) with Thai Buddhist cosmology. The Ramakien and the Three Worlds According to King Ruang are the primary cultural narratives of the Thai people. These narratives give us insight into the worldview of the Thai. By comparing the Thai worldview with the biblical worldview, we can see where they intersect and where they are in conflict. The goal of this article is to spark a dialogue for producing a Thai theological and apologetic perspective that takes seriously Thai cultural worldview understandings in light of divine council cosmology and develops new tools for reaching Thai culture with the Gospel.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 617-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Stopfner

Abstract Heckles are an illegitimate, yet common way of commenting directly and immediately on what is being said at the lectern. However, (non-)verbal interjections can also be used to disconcert the speaker, thus scoring points within the parliamentary arena. In these cases, female delegates are often confronted with discriminatory remarks and comments that border on sexism and even misogyny. Based on the extensive literature on gender and discourse, the following paper will focus on gender-related heckles and analyse argumentative structures and topoi that are grounded in sexist stereotypes and conservative role-models. Presuming that these incidents are not isolated instances, the paper will compare and contrast several examples from around the world that have caught public attention.


Author(s):  
John Gatta

“Imagination,” a word evidently central to the vocation and sensibility of English Romantic poets, is likewise invoked often as a defining term in American literary history. But what are the theological implications of this crucial category, beginning with Coleridge’s seminal statements about it? How might the human faculty of imagination—often but doubtfully associated with an abstractly ethereal quality of mind—bear upon concrete facts of the world humans experience? And how, in the light of philosophic perspectives, together with Wendell Berry’s provocative reflections on “imagination in place,” might Imagination be understood as integral with the phenomenology of place? Such questions are addressed here by means of themes bearing on the Earthiness of Imagination, the Contemplative Reach of Imagination, and Numinous Layers of Place as Palimpsest. Literary texts analyzed to develop these themes include Whitman’s verse and works by two contemporary writers—poet Marilyn Nelson and novelist Alfred Véa.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1048-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sathyadeepak Ramesh ◽  
Robert A Goldberg ◽  
Allan E Wulc ◽  
Alan B Brackup

AbstractBackgroundLower blepharoplasty is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic surgeries in the world. However, there are no studies to directly compare patients who had fat excision vs fat transposition.ObjectivesThe authors sought to compare and contrast aesthetic results of fat excisional and fat transpositional lower blepharoplasty.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of 60 patients (120 eyelids) who underwent transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty, either with fat excision or fat transposition into a preperiosteal plane. Marginal reflex distance-2, lower eyelid length, nasojugal fold depth, and pretarsal orbicularis definition were measured.ResultsMean follow-up was 5.6 months. Mean marginal reflex distance-2 did not significantly differ after either fat excision or fat transposition. Mean lower lid length decreased after fat excision only (P < 0.001), and postoperative fat excision patients had a shorter lower eyelid length than patients who underwent fat transposition (13.5 ± 2.1 mm vs 16.1 ± 1.9 mm, P < 0.0001). Pretarsal orbicularis definition increased after both surgeries (P < 0.001), and the groups did not differ (1.0 ± 0.8 vs 1.1 ± 0.9, not significant). Mean nasojugal fold depth was effaced after surgery in both groups (P < 0.001), although the nasojugal fold was significantly more effaced after fat transposition (1.5 ± 0.7 vs 0.48 ± 0.6, P < 0.001).ConclusionsIn lower blepharoplasty, fat excision resulted in a shorter lower eyelid, and fat transposition resulted in a more effaced lid-cheek junction. Surgeons should be able to balance both techniques to deliver a customized aesthetic result.Level of Evidence: 3


2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 79-82
Author(s):  
Daniel D. Moos

ABSTRACTNurse anesthetists are crucial healthcare providers throughout the world. The duties, regulations, and educational requirements for nurse anesthetists vary from country to country. The purpose of this article is to provide the reader with a brief historical perspective on the development of nurse anesthesia in the United States; describe current nurse anesthesia practice; and allow the reader to compare and contrast it with the practice of nurse anesthesia in their own country.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-411
Author(s):  
Richard Hibbitt

In 1909 André Gide published three short articles in the journal La Nouvelle Revue française, subsequently grouped under the title ‘Nationalisme et littérature’ (Nationalism and literature). They were written as his response to a survey by the young French journalist Henri Clouard, ‘Enquête sur la littérature nationale’ (Survey on National Literature), in which contemporary writers and critics answered questions regarding possible definitions of French literature. Gide questions the value of the term ‘national literature’ and objects to the view that haute littérature (good literature) is synonymous with neo-Classical values, arguing instead for a conception of literature that embraces curiosity and innovation. For Gide the term haute littérature is problematic because it implies a hierarchical, regimented and limited view of both literature and culture tout court. The first part of this article argues that Gide's critique of both national literature and haute littérature can be read as a preference for a literariness that is liberated from the constraints of balance and imitation. The second part reads Gide's agronomic metaphor for literary innovation through the lens of Alexander Beecroft's theory of overlapping literary ecologies. Beecroft's model of different ecologies of world literature helps us to locate what I propose to be Gide's own contribution to the world literature debate: an emphasis on literariness that transcends the national-literature ecology and reclaims the notion of haute littérature for a different aesthetic.


1965 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-49
Author(s):  
Sigurd Aa. Aarnes

Grundtvig3s Historical Writings - Status and Perspectives By Sigurd Aa. Aarnes. For long periods of his life Grundtvig was occupied with the research and representation af history. If as a historian he has, nevertheless, been almost forgotten, it is because his type and aim make him cut across the main trend of nineteenth century positivistic research and historical criticism. Grundtvig was not a historian in the modern professional sense of the word but a narrator and philosopher. He does not aim at establishing historical facts, “wie es eigentlich gewesen” (Leopold von Ranke). He is more concerned with the question how to make history serve the cause of national and religious revival for which he is fighting. As a result of this Grundtvig’s historical writings are of minor interest as such (i.e. as historical writings). We study them today because they are sources of the history of ideas, interesting not by the world history they impart but by what they imply about Grundtvig himself and his age. In the last part of the article the author mentions some objects of research within the field in question. Grundtvig” s chief work of history, the monumental Haandbog i Verdens-Historien (1833-44), has not yet been sufficiently examined. Nor has special attention been paid to the influence of Grundtvig’s historical works on contemporary writers and on the teaching of history in the Folk Highschool. For any study of Grundtvig as a critic of the age his historical writings are of the first importance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document