FRACTURES OF MAXILLARY TUBEROSITY DURING EXTRACTION OF MAXILLARY MOLAR- A CASE REPORT AND REVIEW

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 391
Author(s):  
Mohan Naik ◽  
Vikas Dhupar ◽  
Francis Akkara ◽  
Praveen Kumar
2007 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 256-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidayet B Polat ◽  
Sinan Ay ◽  
M Isa Kara

ABSTRACTMaxillary tuberosity fractures during molar teeth extraction can occur commonly in dental practice; however, very few cases are reported and discussed in the literature. This article presents a case of large fracture of maxillary tuberosity during extraction of first maxillary molar tooth and its conservative treatment outcomes. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:256-259)


RSBO ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Priscila Alves Teixeira ◽  
Carmen L. Mueller Storrer ◽  
Felipe Rychuv Santos ◽  
Aline Monise Sebastiani ◽  
Tatiana Miranda Deliberador

The periodontal treatment of teeth with furcation defect is clinically challenging. In cases of class II furcation defects, the regenerative surgery shows low morbidity and good prognosis when correctly indicated. The aim of the presentstudy is to report a treatment option for class II furcation defect through autogenous bone graft associated with the Bichat’s fat pad. Case report: A 59-year-old female patient was diagnosed with class II furcation defect in the left mandibular first molar. The treatment comprised surgical reconstruction of the defect with a combination of maxillary tuberosity bone graft and Bichat’s fat pad. The clinical and radiographic follow-up of 180 days showed bone formation inthe furcation area and absence of probing depth. Conclusion: An association of autogenous graft form the maxillary tuberosity with a Bichat’s fat pad proved to be a safe, low cost, and effective therapy for the regenerative treatment of class II furcation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Soldatos ◽  
Georgios E. Romanos ◽  
Michelle Michaiel ◽  
Ali Sajadi ◽  
Nikola Angelov ◽  
...  

Background. The placement of an implant in a previously infected site is an important etiologic factor contributing to implant failure. The aim of this case report is to present the management of retrograde peri-implantitis (RPI) in a first maxillary molar site, 2 years after the implant placement. The RPI was treated using an air-abrasive device, Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and guided bone regeneration (GBR). Case Description. A 65-year-old Caucasian male presented with a draining fistula associated with an implant at tooth #3. Tooth #3 revealed periapical radiolucency two years before the implant placement. Tooth #3 was extracted, and a ridge preservation procedure was performed followed by implant rehabilitation. A periapical radiograph (PA) showed lack of bone density around the implant apex. The site was decontaminated with an air-abrasive device and Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and GBR was performed. The patient was seen every two weeks until suture removal, followed by monthly visits for 12 months. The periapical X-rays, from 6 to 13 months postoperatively, showed increased bone density around the implant apex, with no signs of residual clinical or radiographic pathology and probing depths ≤4 mm. Conclusions. The etiology of RPI in this case was the placement of an implant in a previously infected site. The use of an air-abrasive device, Er,Cr:YSGG, and GBR was utilized to treat this case of RPI. The site was monitored for 13 months, and increased radiographic bone density was noted.


Dental Update ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-104
Author(s):  
Fiona Wright ◽  
Colin Ritchie ◽  
Nicholas J Malden ◽  
Eleni Besi

A tuberosity fracture can prevent or delay the timely delivery of the most appropriate treatment option for a maxillary molar. This is a relatively common complication, but should not prevent treatment in general practice provided the clinician has adequately risk assessed, planned and obtained informed consent. Should a fracture occur, its initial management in general practice is encouraged. This article aims to improve patient outcomes by providing a troubleshooting guide. A fracture classification is suggested to aid assessment, recognition and management. Should referral to secondary care be required, a classification system will provide a basis for discussion and clarity on further management. CPD/Clinical Relevance: This article provides a tuberosity fracture classification to guide clinicians in the management of patients who have sustained such a fracture.


2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arpana V Bansal ◽  
Abhinav Bansal ◽  
Vinaya Kumar Kulkarni ◽  
Reema Sharma Dhar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document