Noncognitive Traits as Fundamental Causes of Health Inequality

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 32-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Tam ◽  
Hania Fei Wu
Author(s):  
Sttphane Mussard ◽  
Marra Noel Pi Alperin ◽  
VVronique Thireau
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Yeori Park ◽  
Myoung-Hee Kim ◽  
Saerom Kim

Author(s):  
Danya E. Keene ◽  
Mark B. Padilla

An emerging literature on spatial stigma suggests that negative representations of place may adversely affect the health of individuals who reside in disadvantaged neighborhoods. This chapter reviews the literature on spatial stigma as it relates to neighborhood health inequality. The chapter draws on existing neighborhood research to describe the processes that may connect spatial stigma to health and the ways that spatial stigma is experienced and managed within neighborhoods. It also reviews existing empirical literature that connects measures of spatial stigma to health outcomes, including hypertension. Although the growing literature on spatial stigma represents a new concept for the study of neighborhood effects, it also represents a fundamental departure from this literature.


Author(s):  
Yusra Ribhi Shawar ◽  
Jennifer Prah Ruger

Careful investigations of the political determinants of health that include the role of power in health inequalities—systematic differences in health achievements among different population groups—are increasing but remain inadequate. Historically, much of the research examining health inequalities has been influenced by biomedical perspectives and focused, as such, on ‘downstream’ factors. More recently, there has been greater recognition of more ‘distal’ and ‘upstream’ drivers of health inequalities, including the impacts of power as expressed by actors, as well as embedded in societal structures, institutions, and processes. The goal of this chapter is to examine how power has been conceptualised and analysed to date in relation to health inequalities. After reviewing the state of health inequality scholarship and the emerging interest in studying power in global health, the chapter presents varied conceptualisations of power and how they are used in the literature to understand health inequalities. The chapter highlights the particular disciplinary influences in studying power across the social sciences, including anthropology, political science, and sociology, as well as cross-cutting perspectives such as critical theory and health capability. It concludes by highlighting strengths and limitations of the existing research in this area and discussing power conceptualisations and frameworks that so far have been underused in health inequalities research. This includes potential areas for future inquiry and approaches that may expand the study of as well as action on addressing health inequality.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hjördis Hardardottir ◽  
Ulf‐G Gerdtham ◽  
Erik Wengström

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document