scholarly journals Тестування та оцінювання мовленнєвої компетенції: німецький досвід

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-81
Author(s):  
Інна Тарасюк
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
Critical Perspective ◽  
Individualized Learning ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Power Of Tests ◽  
Individuelle Förderung ◽  
Language Tests ◽  
Adult Immigrants ◽  
Theorie Und Praxis

Оскільки навчання іноземної мови на сьогодні має абсолютно новий, сучасний підхід, оцінювання мовленнєвої компетенції повинно відповідати чітким міжнародним стандартизованим вимогам. Позаяк стаття має стислий інформативний характер, в її межах уточнено поняття оцінювання, як спонукання до відповідної мовленнєвої реакції або дії через чітко поставлені комунікативні завдання. У статті також відображено типи оцінювання, а саме формальне та неформальне, зовнішнє оцінювання та самоконтроль. Через те, що завжди важливо розуміти, з якою метою здійснюється оцінювання мовленнєвої компетенції, у статті виокремлено його функції, а саме: діагностування, сприяння, розпізнання прогресу, констатування досягнення цілей, встановлення рейтингу, виставлення оцінок, порівняння, мотивація та ін. Там, де дві особи, існують дві суб’єктивні картини об’єктивного світу: бачення ситуації тим, хто оцінює, і тим, кого оцінюють, то до уваги також взято психоемоційний аспект досліджуваного питання. Література References Ballweg, S. Drumm, S. Hufeisen, B. Klippel, J., Pilypaityte, L. (2013). Wie lernt man die Fremdsprache Deutsch? Deutsch Lehren Lernen. Band 2. München: Klett-Langenscheidt. Beurteilen im DaF-/DaZ-Unterricht Testen – Evaluieren – Prüfen Akten der Vierten Gesamtschweizerischen Tagung für Deutschlehrerinnen und Deutschlehrer 29. und 30. Juni 2012 – Universität Bern. M. Clalüna, B. Tscharner (Eds.). Impressum Käser Druck. Bolton, S., Glaboniat, M., Lorenz, H., Perlmann-Balme, M., Steiner, S. (2008). Mündlich: Mündliche Produktion und Interaktion Deutsch: Illustration der Niveaustufen des Gemeinsamen europäischen Referenzrahmens. München: Langenscheidt. Garme, B. (2005). Auf den Flügeln der Sprache: Ein diagnostisches Verfahren. In: Anforderungen an Verfahren der regelmäßigen Sprachstandsfeststellung als Grundlage für die frühe und individuelle Förderung von Kindern mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund. (pp. 241-260), K. Ehlich u.a. (Eds.). Bonn: BMBF. Grotjahn, R. (2010). Sprachtests: Formen und Funktionen. In: Handbuch Fremdsprachendidaktik. (pp. 211–215). W. Hallet, F. Königs (Eds.). Seelze-Velber: Kallmeyer. Grotjahn, R., Kleppin, K. (2015) Prüfen, Testen, Evaluieren Klett-Langenscheidt München. Kleppin, K. (2010): Fehleranalyse und Fehlerkorrektur. In: Deutsch als Fremd- und Zweitsprache: ein Internationales Handbuch (1.Halbband). (pp. 1060-1072). H.-J. Krumm (Ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Krumm, H.-J. (2001): Bildungsstandards und Kompetenzorientierung – Herausfor­derungen für das Fach Deutsch als Fremdsprache. In: Theorie und Praxis. Österreichische Beiträge zu Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Bd. 14/2010. (pp. 171–185). H.-J. Krumm, P. R. PortmannTselikas, (Eds.). Innsbruck: Studienverlag. Lengyel, D. (2010). Language Diagnostics in multilingual settings with respect to continuous procedures as accompaniment of individualized learning and teaching. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Source2010_Forum Geneva/1_Diagnostic Lengyel_EN.pdf Roche, J. (2010) Fremdevaluation und Selbstevaluation. In: Handbuch Fremdsprachendidaktik. (pp. 228–231). W. Hallet, F. G. Königs. (Eds.). Seelze-Velber: Kallmeyer. Rumpf, H. (1996). Wirklichkeiten berühren. Umrisse einer neuen Lernkultur. Fragen und Versuche, 77, 8–22. Shohamy, E. (2001). The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Tests. Harlow: Pearson Education. Smit, R. (2008). Formative Beurteilung im kompetenz- und standardorientierten Unterricht. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 26(3), 383–392. Studer, T. (2010). Kompetenzmodelle und Bildungsstandards für Deutsch als Fremd- und Deutsch als Zweitsprache. In: Deutsch als Fremd- und Zweitsprache. Ein internationales Handbuch. (pp. 1264–1271). H-J. Krumm, C. Fandrych, B. Hufeisen, C. Riemer (Eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter. Bd. 2, Art. 142. Van Avermaet, P., Gysen, S. (2008): Language Learning, Teaching and Assessment and the Integration of Adult Immigrants. The Importance of Needs Analysis. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Retrieved from: http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/MigrantsSemin08_MainDocs_ EN.asp.

THE POWER OF TESTS: A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE USES OF LANGUAGE TESTS.Elana Shohamy. London: Longman, 2001. Pp. xxvi + 182. £18.99 paper.

2002 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 644-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
April Ginther
Keyword(s):  
School Administrators ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Motivating Factors ◽  
Critical Perspective ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Power Of Tests ◽  
Language Tests ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Long Term Consequences

In the introduction to The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests, Elana Shohamy raises the following questions: What is the meaning of a test for test takers, parents, teachers, and school administrators? What are the short- and long-term consequences of tests on the lives of individuals? What are the motivating factors behind the administration of language tests? What are the politics of the tests? These kinds of questions logically arise when the examination of testing includes a concern with the use of tests by educational institutions, policy makers, and society at large. Focusing primarily on the misuse of tests, this volume chronicles both intended and unintended test consequences.

scholarly journals INICJATYWY RADY EUROPY I KOMISJI EUROPEJSKIEJ NA RZECZ WSPIERANIA REFLEKSYJNOŚCI NAD PROCESEM UCZENIA SIĘ I NAUCZANIA JĘZYKA OBCEGO

Neofilolog ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (43/1) ◽  
pp. 95-109
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Jedynak
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Language Policy ◽  
European Commission ◽  
Linguistic Diversity ◽  
Focal Point ◽  
Language Education ◽  
Foreign Languages ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Reflective Approach

In the era of globalisation a command of foreign languages is regarded as a priority. For this reason, the Council of Europe and the European Commission promote language learning and linguistic diversity. A focal point in their language policy is reflection, which is recognized as a key feature of an employee’s professionalism. Therefore, the importance of reflection is stressed throughout all the years of language education. The objective of this paper is to give information about the documents, tools and actions which support a reflective approach to language learning and teaching in Europe.

Using Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) materials in English as Second Language (ESL) classrooms: perspectives of teachers and students in United Arab Emirates

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramia DIRAR SHEHADEH MUSMAR
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
United Arab Emirates ◽  
Language Proficiency ◽  
English Language ◽  
Learning Technologies ◽  
Student Diversity ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Computer Assisted Language Learning ◽  
Learning And Teaching

Integrating scaffolding-learning technologies has been recognized for its potential to create intellectual and engaging classroom interactions. In the United Arab Emirates, having language teachers employ computers as a medium of new pedagogical instrument for teaching second languages generated the idea of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) as a medium of an innovative pedagogical instrument for facilitating and scaffolding language learning, with an aspiration that it will lead to improved English language attainment and better assessment results. This study aims at investigating the perspectives of students and teachers on the advantageous and disadvantageous impacts of CALL on learning and teaching English as a second language in one public school in the emirate of Abu Dhabi. The results show that CALL has a facilitating role in L2 classroom and that using CALL activities is advantageous in reducing English learning tension, boosting motivation, catering for student diversity, promoting self-directed language learning and scaffolding while learning English. The results additionally report that numerous aspects like time constraints, teachers’ unsatisfactory computer skills, insufficient computer facilities, and inflexible school courses undesirably affect the implementation of CALL in English classrooms. It is recommended that further studies should be undertaken to investigate the actual effect of CALL on students’ language proficiency. 

Didattica delle lingue in prospettiva interculturale: innovazione e potenzialità

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 189-198
Author(s):  
Manuela Derosas
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environment ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Communicative Competence ◽  
Language Education ◽  
Intercultural Communicative Competence ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Language And Culture ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Vast Literature ◽  
The Creation

Since the early ’80s the adjective "intercultural" in language learning and teaching has seemed to acquire a remarkable importance, although its meaning is strongly debated. As a matter of fact, despite the existence of a vast literature on this topic, difficulties arise when applying it in the classroom. The aim of this work is to analyze the elements we consider to be the central pillars in this methodology, i.e. a renewed language-and culture relation, the Intercultural Communicative Competence, the intercultural speaker. These factors allow us to consider this as a new paradigm in language education; furthermore, they foster the creation of new potentialities and configure the classroom as a significant learning environment towards the discovery of Otherness.

Dialogic Teaching and Translanguaging in Deaf Education

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Swanwick
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Deaf Education ◽  
Deaf Children ◽  
Learning Needs ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Diverse Learning ◽  
Language Context ◽  
Pedagogical Framework

This chapter proposes a pedagogical framework for deaf education that builds on a sociocultural perspective and the role of interaction in learning. Pedagogical principles are argued that recognize the dialogic nature of learning and teaching and the role of language as “the tool of all tools” in this process. Building on established work on classroom talk in deaf education, the issues of dialogue in deaf education are extended to consider deaf children’s current learning contexts and their diverse and plural use of sign and spoken languages. Within this broad language context, the languaging and translanguaging practices of learners and teachers are explained as central to a pedagogical framework that is responsive to the diverse learning needs of deaf children. Within this pedagogical framework practical teaching strategies are suggested that draw on successful approaches in the wider field of language learning and take into account the particular learning experience and contexts of deaf children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document