scholarly journals Study some of Wheat Cultivars Based on Morphological Traits and Drought Tolerance Indices

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (21) ◽  
pp. 44-55
Author(s):  
Maryam Tahmasb Ali ◽  
Ali Asghari ◽  
Omid Safalian ◽  
Hamidreza Mohammaddoust Chaman Abad ◽  
Ali Rasoul Zadeh
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (32) ◽  
pp. 11-21
Author(s):  
ali eftekhari ◽  
amin baghizadeh ◽  
rooholah abdshahi ◽  
mohamad mehdi yaghubi ◽  
◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Pooran GOLKAR ◽  
Esmaeil HAMZEH ◽  
Seyed Ali Mohammad MIRMOHAMMADY MAIBODY

<p>Improvement of elite safflower genotypes for drought-tolerance is hampered by a deficiency of effective selection criteria. The present study evaluated 100 genotypes of safflower in terms of their drought tolerance over a period of three years (2016–2018) under both non-stress and drought-stress conditions. The eight drought-tolerance indices of tolerance index (TOL), mean productivity (MP), geometric mean productivity (GMP), stress susceptibility index (SSI), stress tolerance index (STI), yield stability index (YSI), drought resistance index (DI), and harmonic mean (HARM) were calculated based on seed yield under drought (Y<sub>s</sub>) and non-drought (Y<sub>p</sub>) conditions. A high genetic variation was found in drought tolerance among the genotypes studied. The MP, GMP, and STI indices were able to discriminate between tolerant and drought-sensitive genotypes. Plots of the first and second principal components identified drought-tolerant genotypes averaged over the three study years. Cluster analysis divided the genotypes into three distinct groups using the drought tolerance indices. Ultimately, eight genotypes (namely, G<sub>3</sub>, G<sub>11</sub>, G<sub>13</sub>, G<sub>24</sub>, G<sub>33</sub>, G<sub>47</sub>, G<sub>58</sub>, and G<sub>61</sub>) from different origins were detected as more tolerant to drought stress suitable for use in safflower breeding programs in drought-affected areas. The most tolerant and susceptible genotypes could be exploited to produce mapping populations for drought tolerance breeding programs in safflower.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (25) ◽  
pp. 7-18
Author(s):  
Sanam Safaei Chaeikar ◽  
Babak Rabiei ◽  
Mehdi Rahimi ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjuman Arif ◽  
Najma Parveen ◽  
Muhammad Qandeel Waheed ◽  
Rana Muhammad Atif ◽  
Irem Waqar ◽  
...  

This study was planned with the purpose of evaluating the drought tolerance of advanced breeding lines of chickpea in natural field conditions. Two methods were employed to impose field conditions; the first: simulating drought stress by growing chickpea genotypes at five rainfed areas, with Faisalabad as the non-stressed control environment; and the second: planting chickpea genotypes in spring to simulate a drought stress environment, with winter-sowing serving as the non-stressed environment. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and generalized linear models (GLM) models were both found to be equally effective in extracting main effects in the rainfed experiment. Results demonstrated that environment influenced seed yield, number of primary and secondary branches, number of pods, and number of seeds most predominantly; however, genotype was the main source of variation in 100 seed weight and plant height. The GGE biplot showed that Faisalabad, Kallur Kot, and Bhakkar were contributing the most in the GEI, respectively, while Bahawalpur, Bhawana, and Karor were relatively stable environments, respectively. Faisalabad was the most, and Bhakkar the least productive in terms of seed yield. The best genotypes to grow in non-stressed environments were CH39/08, CH40/09, and CH15/11, whereas CH28/07 and CH39/08 were found suitable for both conditions. CH55/09 displayed the best performance in stress conditions only. The AMMI stability and drought-tolerance indices enabled us to select genotypes with differential performance in both conditions. It is therefore concluded that the spring-sown experiment revealed a high-grade drought stress imposition on plants, and that the genotypes selected by both methods shared quite similar rankings, and also that manually computed drought-tolerance indices are also comparable for usage for better genotypic selections. This study could provide sufficient evidence for using the aforementioned as drought-tolerance evaluation methods, especially for countries and research organizations who have limited resources and funding for conducting multilocation trials, and performing sophisticated analyses on expensive software.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document