scholarly journals Construct Validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) in Shahrekord Cohort Study, Iran

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31
Author(s):  
Ali Ahmadi ◽  
Fatemeh Salehi ◽  
◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lange ◽  
Alexandra Löwe ◽  
Gerrit Stassen ◽  
Andrea Schaller

Abstract Background The emerging adulthood is traditionally viewed as a time of optimal health, but also as a critical life span, characterized by changing life circumstances and the establishment of an individual lifestyle. Especially university life seems to hold several challenges impeding the manifestation of a health supporting manner, as many students tend to show a poorer health behavior and a higher amount of health-related problems than comparable age groups. This, along with a steady growth of the higher education sector, brings increased attention to the university setting in the context of prevention. To date, there are few empirical longitudinal and coherent cross-sectional data on the status of students’ health literacy, health status, and health behaviors, and on the impact of the study format on students’ health. The aim of this prospective cohort study is to reduce this research gap. Methods Starting during winter semester 2020/21, the prospective cohort study collects data on health literacy, health status and health behavior on a semester-by-semester basis. All enrolled students of the IST University of Applied Sciences, regardless of study format and discipline, can participate in the study at the beginning of their first semester. The data are collected digitally via a specifically programmed app. A total of 103 items assess the subjectively perceived health status, life and study satisfaction, sleep quality, perceived stress, physical activity, diet, smoking, alcohol consumption, drug addiction and health literacy. Statistical analysis uses (1) multivariate methods to look at changes within the three health dimensions over time and (2) the association between the three health dimensions using multiple regression methods and correlations. Discussion This cohort study collects comprehensive health data from students on the course of study. It is assumed that gathered data will provide information on how the state of health develops over the study period. Also, different degrees of correlations of health behavior and health literacy will reveal different impacts on the state of students’ health. Furthermore, this study will contribute to empirically justified development of target group-specific interventions. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00023397 (registered on October 26, 2020).


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. e0172340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Nolte ◽  
Richard H. Osborne ◽  
Sarah Dwinger ◽  
Gerald R. Elsworth ◽  
Melanie L. Conrad ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H Osborne ◽  
Roy W Batterham ◽  
Gerald R Elsworth ◽  
Melanie Hawkins ◽  
Rachelle Buchbinder

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynne M. Emmerton ◽  
Liz Mampallil ◽  
Therese Kairuz ◽  
Leigh M. McKauge ◽  
Robert A. Bush

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luísa Campos ◽  
Pedro Dias ◽  
Filipa Palha ◽  
Ana Duarte ◽  
Elisa Veiga

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Mullan ◽  
Pippa Burns ◽  
Kathryn Weston ◽  
Peter McLennan ◽  
Warren Rich ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 140349482092642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid K. Wahl ◽  
Åsmund Hermansen ◽  
Richard H. Osborne ◽  
Marie Hamilton Larsen

Objective: This study aimed to undertake a rigorous psychometric evaluation of the nine-scale Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) based on data from a sample of people with psoriasis. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 825 adults with psoriasis who previously participated in the Norwegian Climate Heliotherapy programme. To investigate the factorial validity of the Norwegian HLQ, confirmatory factor analyses were carried out using Stata. Results: A highly restricted model fit with no cross-loadings or correlated residuals was acceptable for three of the nine scales (‘Feeling understood and supported by health-care providers’, ‘Appraisal of health information’ and ‘Ability to find good health information’). After minor model adjustments of the other scales, one-factor models were acceptable. All scales showed acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.71 to 0.87. Except for three items, all items had high to acceptable factor loadings. Conclusions: This study of the Norwegian HLQ replicates the original factor structure of the Australian HLQ, indicating the questionnaire has cogent and independent scales with good reliability. Researchers, programme implementers and policymakers could use the Norwegian version of the HLQ with confidence to generate reliable information on health literacy for different purposes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document