scholarly journals LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1503-1509
Author(s):  
Mudassar Jabeen ◽  
Bushra Jamil ◽  
Shehzad Amjad Khan
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Standard Procedure ◽  
P Value ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Widespread Acceptance ◽  
Group A ◽  
Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Since the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was reportedin 1990, it has widespread acceptance as a standard procedure using four trocars. The fourth(lateral) trocar is used to grasp the fundus of the gall bladder to expose calot`s triangle. Withincreasing surgeon experience, LC has undergone many refinements including reductionin port number and size. Three port LC has been reported to be safe and feasible in manyclinical trials. Objectives: To compare the operative time and of three ports versus four portlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trials. Setting: SurgicalDepartments, Allied & Civil Hospitals Faisalabad. Period: 15-09-2010 to 15-03-2011. Materialand Methods: 132 Patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy wererandomized to undergo either the 4-port. (Group A) or the 3-port LC (group B).66 patients ineach group. Results: Mean Operative time was 25.14±4.19 minutes in group A and 25.35±4.34in group B. (p value-0.774). Mean VAS score at 12th postoperative hour was 5.37±0.993 ingroup A and 4.52±0.986 in group B. (p value <0.0001). Conclusion: Three port Laparoscopiccholecystectomy did not affect, operative time. However it resulted in less early postoperativepain in three port LC.

Comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in haemorrhoidectomy patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ahmad ◽  
Syed Tatheer Abbas ◽  
Amna Javaid ◽  
Naveed Arshad ◽  
Falak Shair
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Complete Wound Healing ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To assess the comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial study was conducted at General Hospital, Lahore, from March 2019 to September 2019. Informed consent was obtained from eligible 60 patients. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In group-A, haemorrhoidectomy was conducted according to the harmonic scalpel method. In group-B, open haemorrhoidectomy was performed by the Milligan Morgan procedure. Data was assembled through a designed questionnaire and investigated via SPSS version 25. Data were stratified for descriptive statistics, level of haemorrhoids and period of haemorrhoids. Post-stratification, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Mean age of both groups patients were 44.6±7.6 and 43.8±8.2 years, respectively. In group-A, mean operative time was 20.8±2.8 minutes, while 26.5±2.8 minutes in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. In group-A, mean convalescence period was 9.7±2.9 days, while 13.4±3.7 days in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. The mean convalescence period with harmonic scalpel method was 7.4 days (range 5–14, SD 3.6) versus 18.6 days (range 7–30, SD 5.4) with Milligan Morgan technique (P?0.001). This research observed that harmonic scalpel method required almost six weeks for complete wound healing, whereas in  Milligan Morgan technique, complete wound healing was achieved after three months (P<0.05). Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy found an advantageous method when assessing the operative time and convalescence period. Hence, Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy can be adapted as a safe and effective alternative method for treating symptomatic haemorrhoids. Continuous...

scholarly journals BENEFITS OF EARLY POST-ERCP LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A SINGLE CENTRE PROSPECTIVE STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhan javed ◽  
Saira Saleem ◽  
Ayesha Rehman ◽  
Faiza Wattoo ◽  
Nadia Bano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Group A ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Group B

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) following Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is associated with an increased risk of complications. ERCP is associated with increased incidence of complications during LC. Surgery may be performed in same anesthesia with ERCP or up to 6 weeks later. We aimed to determine the benefits of performing LC within 72hrs of ERCP. METHODOLOGY: After institutional ethical approval this prospective cross-sectional study was performed at Madinah Teaching Hospital Faisalabad from April 2019 to June 2020. By performing convenience sampling, all patients undergoing LC after uneventful ERCP in our hospital were included. Study population was divided based on interval between ERCP and Cholecystectomy; Group-A had LC within 72hrs of ERCP, Group B had LC in same hospital stay after 72hrs and Group-C patients were discharged after ERCP and readmitted for LC. Data was collected using custom designed questionnaire, tabulated using Microsoft Excel 2016 and subjected to statistical tests to compare outcomes. Primary outcome was incidence of complications, while operative time, hospital stay and cost were considered as secondary outcomes. p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Total 75 patients were included in study, 32 in Group-A, 20 in Group-B and 23 in Group-C. Average age was 44.987 ± 14.819 and study population was predominantly female (86.67%). Complication rate, duration of hospital stay and average cost were less in Group A as compared to other groups (p<0.05). Mean operative time in 3 groups was similar. CONCLUSION: LC within 72hrs after ERCP provides superior results in terms of fewer complications, shorter hospital stays and lesser cost.

scholarly journals Comparison of Bupivacaine injection versus normal saline in port sites & intraperitoneal spray for postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 1028-1032
Author(s):  
Syed Mehmood Ali ◽  
◽  
Hajra Shuja ◽  
Mehak Adil ◽  
Sadaf Bokhari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Test Sample ◽  
Operational Definition ◽  
T Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare mean pain using bupivacaine injection versus normal saline in port sites & intraperitoneal spray in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Anesthesia, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Period: October 2, 2018 to April 2, 2019. Material & Methods: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients were allocated to obtain either bupivacaine 0.25% or regular saline (N / S) randomly by lottery method. In bupivacaine group-A, 15ml 8of 0.25% bupivacaine spray on gall bladder bed, dissection surface and in ports area after surgery. In normal saline group-B received 15 ml of normal saline in the same area and ports after surgery. Pain was measured on VAS as per operational definition. All the data was entered with SPSS v25.0 and analyzed. A t-test study was used to evaluate the mean pain for both groups at 24th hours. In order to address the effect modifiers, the data was stratified for age, gender, and BMI (obese, non-obese). The independent t-test sample after stratification was used taking p-value 0.05 as relevant. Results: A total of 60 patients were included for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In group-A, mean pain score was 3.33±0.81 and 4.37±1.16 in group-B, which is statistically significant with a p-value of 0.0002. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that bupivacaine spray at the surgical bed and in ports site in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy result in significant lowering of the intensity of postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Conventional Electrocautery Versus Ultrasonic Dissector in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-73
Author(s):  
Saad Bin Anis ◽  
Pir Muneeb Rehman ◽  
Farhan Ahmad ◽  
Umar Farooq
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
P Value ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Ultrasonic Dissector ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is very commonly performed for removal of gallstones. In routine, ultrasonic devices are used for laparoscopy involving the deeper operating fields, while electrosurgical devices are preferred for LC. However, nowadays both of these devices are used for LC. The objective of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of ultrasonic dissector over conventional electrocautery in patients planned for LC. Material and Methods: This non-randomized clinical trial was conducted in general surgery unit, Jinnah hospital Lahore. The study duration was 15th January 2015 to 31st December 2016. In group A (n=100), patients were operated through three-port standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional electrosurgical cautery was used for dissection. While in group B (n=50), patients were operated through single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and Harmonic dissector was used for sealing of cystic artery and cystic duct. SPSS version 23 was used for data analysis. Complications between electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector were compared using chi-square test/Fischer exact test and operative time was compared using student’s t-test with p-value ≤ 0.05 considered as statistically significant.Results: Out of 150 patients planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 33 (22%) were males and 117 (78%) females. The mean age was 40±6.45 years with an age range of 12-80 years. In group A, intraoperative gall bladder perforation was found in 5 patients whereas in group B, there was only one patient with perforation. A total of 4 cases were converted to open cholecystectomy in group A due to difficult dissection in Calot’s triangle as compared to 1 case in group B. In group A, 3 cases had postoperative bile leakage in the drain. In two patients it settled over a period of 3 days. About 03 cases had wound infection in group A and 1 in group B. Mean operative time in group A was 42.2±8.93 minutes versus 35.7±4.85 minutes in group B (p-value 0.001).Conclusion: In this study, the rate of post-operative complications was similar between the two groups, but operative time was significantly shorter in the group B. Harmonic dissector enabled easy dissection of tissues with good hemostasis and less trafficking of instrument, avoiding use of clips and sutures during minimal invasive surgery.

Comparison of effect of Various Combinations of four drugs i.e IV Ondansetron, Ranitidine, Metoclopramide and Omeprazole, to reduce Gastric Fluid Residual Volume and Gastric Acidity in Elective Laparoscopic-Cholecystectomy patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1760-1763
Author(s):  
Riffat Saeed ◽  
Irfan Ali ◽  
Iram Qamar ◽  
Syed Mehmood Ali ◽  
Amer Latif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gastric Acidity ◽  
Gastric Fluid ◽  
P Value ◽  
Residual Volume ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Background: Inhaling of gastric contents in lower respiratory tract and larynx results in developing of pulmonary aspiration. The acidity of aspirate contents and its volume determines severity of aspiration and is major cause of post-anesthetic mortality. Objective: To compare the effect of four drugs (ranitidine, IV ondansetron, metoclopramide, omeprazole and metoclopramide) in all possible four combinations, to decrease gastric fluid residual volume and gastric acidity in undergoing laparoscopic-cholecystectomy. Design: It was a clinical randomized trial. Study Settings: Trial was conducted at Department of Anesthesiology and ICU, Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, for a period of 6 months from 01-07-2019 to 31-12-2019. Patients and Methods: A total of 308 patients from both the genders undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this study. Four equal groups were made by random division of patients. Group A: ranitidine & ondansetron, group B: ranitidine & metoclopramide, group C: omeprazole & ondansetron and group D: omeprazole & metoclopramide. Pre-anesthetic medicine was given to all the patients two hours before surgery. For assessing volume of gastric fluid and its pH, an oro-gastric tube was passed. An informed written informed consent was taken from all the patients. Results: Mean age in this study was 36.40±9.15, 33.23±9.13, 36.82±9.37 and 36.57±9.49 years respectively for Group A,B,C and D. Aspirate had mean quantity of 12.56±5.60 ml/kg, 12.65±5.39 ml / kg, 13.68±5.76 ml/kg and 14.34±6.85 ml/kg and he aspirate mean pH was 2.56±0.55, 2.47±0.58, 2.51±0.57 and 2.45±0.58 respectively for group A,B,C and D. Among both the trial groups, this different was insignificant (p-value > 0.05) for both outcomes. Conclusion: All the drug combinations had no significant difference. However, comparatively less pH and volume of gastric fluid was shown by combination of ranitidine plus ondansetron. Therefore, this combination is recommended before general anesthesia for reducing gastric fluid aspirate in patients undergoing surgery. Keywords: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Omeprazole, Ranitidine, Metoclopramide, Ondansetron, gastric fluid acidity, pH, gastric fluid volume

scholarly journals 975 Outcome of Low Verus Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Anwaar ◽  
R Ahmed ◽  
Z Hashmi ◽  
Q Qavi ◽  
T Zafar
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
Standard Pressure ◽  
Group B

Abstract Introduction Recent studies have shown that patients may experience considerable pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy as well. Hence, this study was done to compare results on post op pain with low pressure pneumoperitoneum compared with standard pneumoperitoneum. Method 100 patients were selected for study and equally divided in two groups randomized into Low pressure (n = 50) and Standard pressure (n = 50). Operative time (min), postoperative pain (VAS) and frequency of Shoulder Tip Pain was noted in both groups Results A total of 100 patients were enrolled for this study. Patients were divided into two groups i.e. Group-A (Standard pressure) and Group-B (Low pressure). In group-A, there were 35(70%) males and 15(30%) females, while in group-B, there were 41(82%) males and 9(18%) females. Mean age of group-A patients was 42.0±7.0 years and 44.5±8.1 years in group-B. In group-A, 18(36%) patients had shoulder tip pain, while 4(8%) patients had had shoulder tip pain in group-B patients with a p-value of 0.001, which is statistically significant. Conclusions Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using low pressure pneumoperitoneum is feasible and results in less post-operative shoulder tip pain.

scholarly journals Suture mesh fixation versus glue mesh fixation in open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 863
Author(s):  
D. K. Shah ◽  
Kamlesh Soni ◽  
Manish Bariya ◽  
Tejas Vagh
Keyword(s):  
Groin Pain ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Mesh Fixation ◽  
P Value ◽  
Chronic Groin Pain ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: This randomized controlled trials was conducted for systematic comparison of suture mesh fixation (SMF) versus glue mesh fixation (GMF) in open inguinal hernia repair with regards to chronic groin pain, recurrence, operative time, post operative pain and postoperative complications.Methods: This study was a single-center, prospective randomized, controlled trial of two groups. It compared post-operative outcomes of mesh fixation with suture (Group A) versus glue (Group B). It was done at Baroda Medical College and S.S.G. Hospital, from May 2018 to January 2019 for case study, intervention and followed up for 9 months till October 2019.Results: Intra operative time duration for mesh fixation is less in Group B (glue mesh fixation) as compare with Group A (suture mesh fixation) with the statistically significant p value of 0.003. Post-operative pain score (mean VAS score) is significantly less in group B. Mean VAS in group A was 1.27 at 3 month while in group B was 1.06 with the p value of 0.048 on 3 month, which is statistically significant. It suggests that chronic groin pain (pain at or after 3 month) significantly less in group B as compared with group A.Conclusions: Mesh fixation by glue has advantage of less intra operative time duration and less post-operative pain and chronic groin pain as compare to mesh fixation by suture.

scholarly journals ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECISTECTOMY: IS IT WORTH DOING?

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcio Alexandre Terra PASSOS ◽  
Pedro Eder PORTARI-FILHO
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Group B

ABSTRACT Background: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has very low risk for infectious complications, ranging the infection rate from 0.4% to 1.1%. Many surgeons still use routine antibiotic prophylaxis Aim: Evaluate the real impact of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies in low risk patients. Method: Prospective, randomized and double-blind study. Were evaluated 100 patients that underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy divided in two groups: group A (n=50), patients that received prophylaxis using intravenous Cephazolin (2 g) during anesthetic induction and group B (n=50), patients that didn't receive any antibiotic prophylaxis. The outcome evaluated were infeccious complications at surgical site. The patients were reviewed seven and 30 days after surgery. Results: There was incidence of 2% in infection complications in group A and 2% in group B. There was no statistical significant difference of infectious complications (p=0,05) between the groups. The groups were homogeneous and comparable. Conclusion: The use of the antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low risk patients doesn't provide any significant benefit in the decrease of surgical wound infection.

scholarly journals Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using harmonic scalpel with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients of symptomatic gallstones.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 2050-2055
Author(s):  
Muhammad Asif ◽  
Muhammad Faheem Anwer ◽  
Muhammad Hasan Anwaar ◽  
Shahbaz Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Kamran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Symptomatic Gallstones ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To compare the laparoscopic cholecystectomy using harmonic scalpel with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients of symptomatic gallstones in terms of mean operative time and mean intra-operative blood loss. Study Design: Randomized Control trial. Setting: Department of Surgical at Allied Hospital Faisalabad. Period: 6 months Oct 2017 to Mar 2018. Material & Methods: Eighty (80) patients (forty in one group) divided randomly into A (harmonic scalpel group) and B (conventional) group, done under general anesthesia. Total time of operation and blood loss during procedure was noted. Results: Our study showed that mean operative time in Harmonic group (A) was 38.07+5.28 minutes and in Conventional group (B) 63.75+7.62 minutes, (p-value = 0.0001), blood loss in Harmonic group (A) 32.93+8.86ml and 55.53+8.96ml in Conventional group (B), (p-value = 0.0001). Conclusion: It is concluded that the laparoscopic cholecystectomy using harmonic scalpel is significantly better when compared with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients of symptomatic gallstones in terms of mean operative time and mean intra-operative blood loss.

scholarly journals Comparison of standard and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; reduction in frequency and intensity of post-operative shoulder pain

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
Sania Waseem ◽  
Humera Naz Altaf ◽  
Sehrish Latif ◽  
Omar Shahzad Altaf ◽  
Fareeha Farooqui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Intraabdominal Pressure ◽  
P Value ◽  
Reduced Pressure ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Group A ◽  
Standard Pressure ◽  
Group B

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now gold standard and depends on good exposure of the peritoneal cavity. It is achieved by insufflation of the abdominal cavity with CO2. Operating at lower intraabdominal pressure (<12 -15mmHg) has been associated with fewer pulmonary and hemodynamic complications and lesser postoperative pain. Objective: To ascertain the advantages of low pressure pneumoperitoneum over standard pressure pneumoperitoneum Methods: Our study was quasi experimental study conducted at  KRL Hospital, Islamabad over period of 3years from 2013 to 2016. SPSS version 20 was used to calculate p value.  Results: A total of 456 patients of gallstones were equally divided in two groups assigned to undergo low pressure (7-8mm of Hg) pneumoperitoneum or standard pressure (12-14mm of Hg) pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic cholecystectomy The average age of patients was 46.2+/-13.6yrs in group A compared to 43.5 +/- 12.9 in group B. There were 60 (26.3%) male and 168 (73.7%) female patients in group A compared to 53 (23.2% and 175 (76.85) in group B respectively. It was found that group A 14 (6.1%) had no pain, 26 (11.4%) had VAS between 1 – 7 and 188 (82.5%) had VAS of 8 – 10 where as in group B 164 (72.6%) patients reported no shoulder tip pain postoperatively, 42 (18.6%) had VAS of 1 – 7 and 20 (8.8%) had VAS OF 8 – 10. The difference was statistically significant (p-value = <0.001). Conclusions: reduced pressure of pneumoperitoneum to 7 – 8 mm of Hg produce lower incidence of postoperative shoulder tip pain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document