Know your full potential: Kelvin probe force microscopy on nanoscale electrical devices and at solid-liquid interfaces

Author(s):  
Amelie Axt ◽  
Ilka Hermes ◽  
Stefan A.L. Weber
2014 ◽  
Vol 116 (13) ◽  
pp. 134307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Umeda ◽  
Kei Kobayashi ◽  
Noriaki Oyabu ◽  
Yoshiki Hirata ◽  
Kazumi Matsushige ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 201-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liam Collins ◽  
Stephen Jesse ◽  
Jason I Kilpatrick ◽  
Alexander Tselev ◽  
M Baris Okatan ◽  
...  

Conventional closed loop-Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) has emerged as a powerful technique for probing electric and transport phenomena at the solid–gas interface. The extension of KPFM capabilities to probe electrostatic and electrochemical phenomena at the solid–liquid interface is of interest for a broad range of applications from energy storage to biological systems. However, the operation of KPFM implicitly relies on the presence of a linear lossless dielectric in the probe–sample gap, a condition which is violated for ionically-active liquids (e.g., when diffuse charge dynamics are present). Here, electrostatic and electrochemical measurements are demonstrated in ionically-active (polar isopropanol, milli-Q water and aqueous NaCl) and ionically-inactive (non-polar decane) liquids by electrochemical force microscopy (EcFM), a multidimensional (i.e., bias- and time-resolved) spectroscopy method. In the absence of mobile charges (ambient and non-polar liquids), KPFM and EcFM are both feasible, yielding comparable contact potential difference (CPD) values. In ionically-active liquids, KPFM is not possible and EcFM can be used to measure the dynamic CPD and a rich spectrum of information pertaining to charge screening, ion diffusion, and electrochemical processes (e.g., Faradaic reactions). EcFM measurements conducted in isopropanol and milli-Q water over Au and highly ordered pyrolytic graphite electrodes demonstrate both sample- and solvent-dependent features. Finally, the feasibility of using EcFM as a local force-based mapping technique of material-dependent electrostatic and electrochemical response is investigated. The resultant high dimensional dataset is visualized using a purely statistical approach that does not require a priori physical models, allowing for qualitative mapping of electrostatic and electrochemical material properties at the solid–liquid interface.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 1809-1819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelie Axt ◽  
Ilka M Hermes ◽  
Victor W Bergmann ◽  
Niklas Tausendpfund ◽  
Stefan A L Weber

In this study we investigate the influence of the operation method in Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) on the measured potential distribution. KPFM is widely used to map the nanoscale potential distribution in operating devices, e.g., in thin film transistors or on cross sections of functional solar cells. Quantitative surface potential measurements are crucial for understanding the operation principles of functional nanostructures in these electronic devices. Nevertheless, KPFM is prone to certain imaging artifacts, such as crosstalk from topography or stray electric fields. Here, we compare different amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency modulation (FM) KPFM methods on a reference structure consisting of an interdigitated electrode array. This structure mimics the sample geometry in device measurements, e.g., on thin film transistors or on solar cell cross sections. In particular, we investigate how quantitative different KPFM methods can measure a predefined externally applied voltage difference between the electrodes. We found that generally, FM-KPFM methods provide more quantitative results that are less affected by the presence of stray electric fields compared to AM-KPFM methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document