scholarly journals A Comparative Analysis and Reference of Long-term Care Patterns in Foreign Countries

Author(s):  
Xiaoying Chen ◽  
Xiaofang Wang
2013 ◽  
pp. 205-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuzanna Drożdżak ◽  
Maria Gabriella Melchiorre ◽  
Jolanta Perek-Białas ◽  
Andrea Principi ◽  
Giovanni Lamura

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (06) ◽  
pp. 1185-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
YOSHIMI WADA

ABSTRACTThere has been an increasing emphasis on choice for older people in long-term care in both England and Japan. However, despite the emphasis on the importance of choice, the perspectives of older people have been given little attention. Considering national and local policies in Bristol, England and Kyoto, Japan, the article explores how older people are exercising (and not exercising) choice in care practice through examining the perspectives of the older people themselves, as well as key informants in the field. Empirical data were collected from interviews with older people and key informants in the two countries, and were analysed using qualitative and comparative approaches. Choice in policy is regarded as a mechanism of the market with an assumption of the independent autonomous individual who can exercise ‘rational choice’. However, the findings have reflected older people's relational decision-making, which does not conform to the rational model of decision-making, and illustrates the value of ‘interdependence’. The findings from care practice have shown that choice was considered an important value in involving older people's views and ensuring their needs are met sensitively and respectfully. The findings also suggested that consideration of the psychological aspects of choice is an important aspect of ‘care’, facilitating the inclusion of older people's views in the process of making judgements, in order to meet their needs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006051986563
Author(s):  
Li Min ◽  
Xu Huilan

Objective Based on theoretical and methodological research and the results of a literature review, we evaluated and comparatively analyzed the quality of long-term care for older populations in China and in Western countries. Methods We performed a literature review, using the search terms long-term care and care services for older adults, in the databases ProQuest, CNKI, and Wanfang Data. Results Our comparative analysis demonstrated that the overall quantity of articles related to long-term care for older populations was relatively large. The literature comprises advanced accumulated experiences in terms of theoretical and methodological perspectives in developed countries. The field of long-term care is relatively young in China and we could retrieve only a few related studies. Conclusions The system of long-term care for older populations in China has much room for improvement. In addition, the evaluation criteria for long-term care quality remain controversial. Relevant research focusing on the quality of long-term care services in the country lacks comprehensive, systematic, and scientific validation, comparison, and evaluation. This topic warrants further evidence-based investigation in China.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document