scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN ESTIMASI ANGGARAN BIAYA ANTARA METODE BOW, SNI DAN PERHITUNGAN KONTRAKTOR

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Bambang Piluto

In determining the price of a job, it need the basic tool of unit price analysis, namely the construction costs analysis. In calculating the construction costs analysis there are several methods have been generally used such as analysis of BOW, SNI and also companies that make their own calculation analysis. A comparative study is needed from the three methods so that it can be seen which is more effective and efficient as a basis for all parties in determining the strategy in terms of cost budget estimates. The study was conducted by preparing a project cost budget plan based on the volume of works on the bill of quantity (BoQ). The unit price analysis is calculated based on BOW analysis, SNI analysis and Contractor version analysis. From the estimation results, a price based on BOW analysis is IDR 2,682,315,013,-, based on SNI analysis is IDR 1,958,002,381, - and based on analysis of contractor calculations is IDR 1,781,956,483. Differences in price between BOW and SNI is IDR 724,312,632. Differences in price between BOW and contractors calculation is IDR 900,358,529. Differences price between SNI and contractors calculation  is IDR 176,045,897.

Author(s):  
Hinawan Teguh Santoso

The elevated road construction which is originally intended to overcome congestion at the intersection of the highway/train, actually sometimes worsen the congestion that exists during the construction period. Therefore, a new construction method and technology is needed to minimize the congestion and provide a short construction period. CSS-Mortar Foam is a new technology introduced by the Research Center of the Ministry of PUPR (Pusjatan) in 2016 which has been applied to the construction of the Antapani flyover in Bandung. A study is needed to compare the construction cost of this technology with the technology of the overpass structure which is commonly used, namely PCI-Girder. Data collection process in this study are planning and DED data, inventory of work items and volumes, and the unit price. The next step is the construction-costs calculation process of the proposed alternative-construction types. The calculation of construction costs was carried out using the Work Unit Price Analysis (AHSP) which is developed by the Directorate General of Highways based on the third revision of 2010 General Specifications. The results showed that the alternative CSS-Mortar Foam construction types was able to reduce the construction costs of flyovers by 44.7% compared to the PCI-Girder construction type. Thus, CSS-Mortar Foam construction can be used as a more efficient alternative for flyovers/bridges construction.


1997 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. L. Woolverton ◽  
Justin A. English ◽  
Michael R. Weed

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 300-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetto Ielpo ◽  
Hipolito Duran ◽  
Eduardo Diaz ◽  
Isabel Fabra ◽  
Riccardo Caruso ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 347
Author(s):  
Henny Prasetiyo ◽  
Yosef Cahyo Setianto Poernomo ◽  
Agata Iwan Candra

Road pavement is a major component in supporting the smooth running of land transportation so that it can be accessed comfortably and safely by road users. Road pavement, according to its type, is divided into three types, namely flexible pavement, rigid pavement, and composite pavement. On flexible pavements, there are several methods used to determine the thickness of the pavement in the initial plan. The method used as a reference is the 2017 Design Manual Method, and the calculation of the RAB refers to the Basic Unit Price Analysis in 2019. This study aims to obtain good quality flexible pavement but at a low cost in terms of the 2017 Design Manual method and analysis calculations and The price of the basic unit (RAB) in 2019. From the calculation of the pavement thickness of each layer, namely the top layer of 5 cm, the middle layer of 20 cm, and the bottom layer of 15 cm, it is known that the cost required to carry out the construction of the pavement is Rp. 73,342,707,500.00.Perkerasan jalan adalah komponen utama dalam menunjang lancarnya suatu transportasi darat, sehingga jalan dapat diakses dengan mudah, nyaman dan aman oleh pengguna jalan. Perkerasan jalan menurut jenisnya dibagi menjadi tiga yaitu perkerasan lentur, perkerasan kaku dan perkerasan komposit. Pada perkerasan lentur terdapat beberapa metode yang digunakan untuk menentukan tebal perkerasan perencanaan awal. Adapun metode yang dipakai sebagai acuan adalah Metode Manual Desain 2017 serta perhitungan RAB mengacu dengan Analisa Harga Satuan Dasar pada tahun 2019. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendapatkan mutu perkerasan lentur yang baik tetapi dengan biaya yang murah ditinjau dari metode Manual Desain 2017 serta perhitungan Analisa Harga Satuan Dasar (RAB) pada tahun 2019. Dari hasil perhitungan tebal perkerasan masing-masing lapisan yaitu lapis atas 5 cm, lapis tengah 20 cm, dan lapis bawah 15 cm diketahui biaya yang diperlukan guna melaksanakan pembangunan perkerasan jalan tersebut sebesar Rp. 73.342.707.500,00.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-19
Author(s):  
Dian Febrianti ◽  
Zakia Zakia

Keberhasilan suatu  proyek dilihat dari keuntungan yang didapatkan dan kecepatan dalam menyelesaikan proyek tersebut, sehingga faktor pemilihan alat berat sangat penting dalam keberhasilan suatu proyek. Biaya penggunaan alat berat yang tinggi, berpengaruh pada konstribusi alat berat terhadap pelaksanaan proyek maka permasalahan yang timbul pada penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis biaya dan waktu penggunaan salah satu alat berat, yaitu excavator. Permasalahan diatas mendasari penelitian ini untuk mencari durasi penggunaan alat berat excavator dengan metode barchart untuk mengetahui berapa lama durasi penggunaannya dan selanjutnya menghitung biaya penyusutan (depresiasi) alat berat dengan menggunakan metode garis lurus untuk mengetahui nilai sisa alat setelah pemakaian alat dan yang terakhir untuk menghitung biaya penggunaan alat berat menggunakan Analisis Harga Satuan Pekerjaan (ASHP). Penelitian ini dilakukan pada pekerjaan timbunan pilihan pada proyek peningkatan jalan alun-alun suka makmue - jalan lingkar timur ibu kota tahap II kabupaten Nagan Raya. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan dengan menggunakan metode barchart maka diperoleh waktu penggunaan alat berat pada pekerjaan timbunan pilihan adalah  excavator 36 hari. Selanjutnya  hasil perhitungan depresiasi alat berat mengalami penurunan nilai asetnya adalah excavator  tipe hitachi Rp.136.000.000/tahun, excavator tipe komathatsu Rp.53.000.000/tahun, dan terakhir hasil mehitung biaya sewa penggunaan alat berat adalah excavator tipe hitachi sebesar Rp.365.300/hari, excavator tipe komathatsu sebesar Rp.409.400.,00/hari. Kesimpulan yang didapat pada penelitian ini adalah pengunaan alat berat yang optimal dapat mengghemat penggunaan biaya sewa alat berat.Kata kunci : Alat berat, Durasi, DepresiasiThe success of a project is seen from the benefits obtained and the speed in completing the project, so that the selection factor of heavy equipment is very important in the success of a project. The cost of using heavy equipment is high, affecting the contribution of heavy equipment to the implementation of the project, the problems that arise in this study aim to analyze the cost and time of use of one of the heavy equipment, namely an excavator. The above problems underlie this study to find the duration of the use of excavator heavy equipment with the barchart method to determine how long the duration of use and then calculate the depreciation of heavy equipment using the straight-line method to determine the remaining value of the tool after use of the tool and the last to calculate the cost heavy equipment use using Job Unit Price Analysis (ASHP). This research was carried out on selected heap work on a road improvement project in the town square like makmue - the eastern ring road of the second stage capital of Nagan Raya district. Based on the results of calculations using the barchart method, it is obtained the time of heavy equipment usage on the selected pile job is 36 days excavator. Furthermore, the calculation of the depreciation of heavy equipment experienced a decrease in the value of its assets are hitachi type excavators Rp. 136,000,000 / year, komathatsu type excavators Rp. 53,000,000 / year, and finally the result of calculating the rental cost of heavy equipment is hitachi type excavators Rp.365,300 / day, komathatsu type excavators of Rp. 409,400 .00 / day. The conclusion obtained in this study is that the optimal use of heavy equipment can save the use of heavy equipment rental costs.Keywords: Heavy equipment, Duration, Depreciation


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-59
Author(s):  
Roi Milyardi ◽  
Indra Koheru ◽  
Cindrawaty Lesmana

The procurement process in construction is quite complicated with its various methods. One of them, design and construct contracting, which often used, is one that has an advantage of saving time and money. However, for companies without sufficient capabilities to carry out procurement, the design construct contract method also requires expert assistance in the process. To meet the construction procurement process requirements, one workable solution is that the company collaborates with a university for its factory construction development. The relevant academicians have expertise to solve problems in procurement process. The academician team was collecting appropriate data and then evaluating it to give suggestions on the construction procurement process. The method used was a simple comparison of the price proposed by the contractor to the owner estimate which was then calculated based on the Indonesian Regulation by the Minister of Public Works and Housing no. 28/PRT/M/concerning the unit price analysis that used as reference. Prices for materials, tools, and wages referred from Indonesian unit price journal references. The result of the evaluation was to determine the contract winner based on price and technical design aspects within company budget. During the evaluation process, clarification was made regarding the proposed design, construction method and quality of the proposed material to match the technical aspects of the design. The price evaluation process which was carried out in a short term has assisted the company in carrying out its construction procurement process. In the long run, cooperation can be developed in the form of human resource training so that the company can develop independently in carrying out the construction procurement process.   Keywords: construction procurement, community service, owner estimate


2021 ◽  
Vol 1203 (3) ◽  
pp. 032115
Author(s):  
Verónica Molina ◽  
Pedro Angumba

Abstract Adobe is an old material used in construction but over time, this construction system has lost space and preference among population. Hence, the need to seek alternatives as professionals in the construction area to encourage the use of the Adobe technique has raised. Thus, the present study made a cost of the items involved in the construction of houses from the adobe based on the theoretical references. In addition, it established a unit price analysis that identifies the particularities of this system focusing on an analytical, descriptive-conclusive methodology whose data are analysed from the results of applying a survey (n = 96) to the inhabitants of the rural sector of Cuenca and construction experts (n = 11). The average price of the construction of houses with Adobe is $ 38,357.23 dollars for a house of 150 m2 taking into account that the real costs and the construction activity are sensitive to changes in the population and market prices.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 89-101
Author(s):  
Novika Candra Fertilia ◽  
Sani Sona Swasti

Like the project in general, slab work on Project Indonesia 1 uses one material, namely metal deck. The upper structure slab consists of 64 floors with a majority of 90% using a metal deck system. Where these components require support that can carry the workload, rebar, and fresh concrete. Starting with Metaldeck's non-reusable / fixed supporting (angle & anchor) design which is quite difficult to apply in the field, it has an impact on increasing time and increasing the cost of work. So the engineering team has the innovation of replacing non-reusable / fixed supporting material (angle & anchor) with reusable material (angle & drop hollow). Cost analysis is sought by calculating the RAB (Cost Budget Plan) using the unit price analysis used by the DKI Jakarta Government and how efficient the time gained. Based on the results of calculations and interviews with relevant experts on the project, the implementation of temporary supporting work costs was carried out using a non-reusable method of Rp.3,211,000,000.00. As for the implementation of the reusable method of Rp.649,916,800. There is a difference in cost between the non-reusable and reusable methods of Rp. 2,561,083,200.00. Where to implement the temporary supporting reusable method is cheaper than using the non-reusable initial method. Then in terms of installation time, the temporary supporting using the non-reusable method was 520 days while for the reusable method it was 260 days. There is a difference between the non-reusable and 260-day reusable methods. The results obtained that the use of Welded Angle & Drop Hollow as Temporary Supporting is more effective and efficient than using the initial Non-reusable method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document