scholarly journals PROFIL KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN INDUKTIF MATEMATIKA MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA UNIPA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Agus Haryono ◽  
Benidiktus Tanujaya
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Inductive Reasoning ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problems

<p>The purpose of this research was to study the profile of students' mathematical inductive reasoning abilities regarding visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles in solving mathematical problems. The research method used is qualitative with a descriptive approach. The results of the study showed that UNIPA mathematics education students tended to study with Visual Learning Styles. Students with this learning style tend to have inductive mathematical reasoning abilities that are better than inductive mathematical reasoning abilities of students learning with auditorial learning styles and those who learn with the kinesthetic learning style. Also, Mathematics Education students of the University of Papua do not have the ability to examine the validity of an argument and find patterns or characteristics of mathematical symptoms to generalize.</p>

scholarly journals PROSES BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA REALISTIK MATERI GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Finsensius Yesekiel Naja ◽  
Agustina Mei ◽  
Sofia Sa'o
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Thinking Processes

The purpose of this study is to describe the profile of students' critical thinking in solving realistic mathematical problems of geometry material in terms of learning styles. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. Critical thinking in this study refers to critical thinking with FRISCO criteria. In this study, subjects were taken from students of class VII SMP N 2 Ende Selatan. Each student's research subjects have visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. Data collection is done by providing a Problem Solving Test (TPM) and an interview. The results obtained, subjects who have a visual learning style, critical thinking processes in solving realistic mathematical problems, able to understand problems, the subject has not been able to determine ways to solve problems, the subject has not been able to carry out the settlement and the subject does not re-examine. Subjects who have auditory learning styles, critical thinking profiles in solving realistic mathematical problems are able to understand problems, but the subject does not re-examine. Subjects who have kinesthetic learning styles of critical thinking processes in solving realistic mathematical problems are able to understand problems, are able to plan problems, subjects can carry out well and check the results.

scholarly journals ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN INDUKTIF MATEMATIS MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA UNIVERSITAS PAPUA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Septian Woro Drupadi ◽  
Jeinne Mumu
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Inductive Reasoning ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Reasoning Skills

This research was conducted to analyze the mathematical Inductive reasoning abilities of students’ mathematics education UNIPA. Research on inductive mathematical reasoning skills using qualitative methods using observation techniques, tests and interviews. The results showed that the mathematical inductive reasoning abilities of mathematics education students UNIPA were mostly in the moderate category. Students' inductive reasoning ability on each indicator is the ability to present mathematical statements in writing or drawings of 66.66%, the ability to submit suspicions by 26.66%, mathematical manipulation ability of 29.44%, ability to compile evidence, provide reasons or evidence for some solutions of 5.82%, finding patterns or traits of mathematical symptoms to generalize of 30.27%, examining validity of arguments 11.32% and drawing conclusions from statements of 5.27%.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika (IAIM NU) Metro

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-114
Author(s):  
Santi Widyawati
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Islamic Studies ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematics Program ◽  
Student Grades

Learning style is one of the factors that allegedly affect the learning achievement (GPA) of Mathematics Education Mathematics Program of Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Institute of Islamic Studies. The purpose of this research is to know "whether there is influence of learning style type (Visual, Auditorial, and kinestetik) to student learning achievement of Mathematics Education Program of Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Islamic Institute of Mathematics”. The type of this research is comparative causal research with 3 × 1 research design. The population in this research is all students of semester IV of Mathematics Education program of Maarif Islamic Institute Nahdatul Ulama Metro academic year 2015/2016. The sample in this study was obtained by using class random technique. The sample in this study consists of 22 students with details of 10 students who have visual learning style, 4 students who have auditorial learning style, and 8 students who have kinesthetic learning style. Instruments used to collect data are questionnaire learning style and transcript of student grades semester IV of Mathematics Education Mathematics course Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Institute of Islamic Studies. Hypothesis testing in this study used a one way variance analysis with unequal cells.The result of this research is the influence of learning style to learning achievement (GPA) of Mathematics Education Mathematics Program of Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Institute of Islamic Studies. Furthermore, after further test using Scheefe 'method, it was found that students with visual learning styles had the same learning achievement with students with auditorial learning style, while both types of learning styles had better learning achievement compared with students with kinesthetic learning style.

scholarly journals The Process of Students' Mathematical Connection in Solving Mathematical Problems in terms of Learning Styles

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1451-1466
Author(s):  
Baiduri Baiduri, Arif Hidayatul Khusna, Mar’atus Solikhah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Connections ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
Mathematical Connection

The purpose of this study was to describe the process of students' mathematical connections in solving mathematical problems in terms of learning styles. The type of research used is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research subjects were six students consisting of two students who have a visual learning style, two students who have an auditory learning style, and two students who have a kinesthetic learning style. Student learning style data were collected through learning style questionnaires, while student connection process data were collected through mathematical connection test sheets and interviews. Data credibility is done by triangulating sources and methods. Data from the six subjects consisting of two students for each of these learning styles were described and categorized from the same, different, and specific views. The subjects obtained from the results of the learning style questionnaire were compared using the results of the mathematical connection test and interviews. Data analysis was guided by four steps to solve Polya's problems and was carried out in three stages, namely data condensation, data presentation, and conclusions. The results showed that there are differences in the mathematical connection process carried out by students who have visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles in the step of understanding the problem. However, there are similarities in the mathematical connection process carried out by students who have visual and kinesthetic learning styles at the step of compiling a completion plan and checking again. while students who have a different auditory learning style from students who have visual and kinesthetic learning styles in implementing the completion plan and re-checking. The process of mathematical connection of students who have an auditory learning style at the step of checking back cannot be seen, because these students do not take this step when solving problems. Researchers suggest that teachers need to accustom students to connecting mathematics both internally and externally and pay attention to the emphasis of the material given to students so that students' mathematical connections are more developed. because the student did not take this step when solving the problem. Researchers suggest that teachers need to accustom students to connecting mathematics both internally and externally and pay attention to the emphasis of the material given to students so that students' mathematical connections are more developed. because the student did not take this step when solving the problem. Researchers suggest that teachers need to accustom students to connecting mathematics both internally and externally and pay attention to the emphasis of the material given to students so that students' mathematical connections are more developed.

THE EFFECT OF REALISTIC MATHEMATHIC EDUCATION MODELS ON MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITY REVIEWED FROM STUDENT’S LEARNING STYLES

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Dini Apriani ◽  
Mujib Mujib ◽  
Dona Dinda Pratiwi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Mathematical Education ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Education Model ◽  
Essay Tests ◽  
Better Than

<span class="fontstyle0">Abstract </span><span class="fontstyle2">This study aims to see the effect of realistic mathemathic education models<br />on students' mathematical reasoning abilities in terms of learning styles. This type of<br />research is quantitative. Data collection techniques used were essay tests and<br />interviews. The data analysis technique used is hypothesis testing using 2-way anava.<br />But before the anava test is carried out, the normality, homogeneity and balance tests<br />are performed. Based on the data that is known that normal data, based on the same<br />and balanced variance obtained by the 2-way Anova test results indicate that there<br />is an influence of the RTE model on students' mathematical reasoning ability, namely<br />the reasoning ability of students with RME model treatment is better than the<br />mathematical reasoning ability with conventional treatment methods. In addition<br />there is the influence of student learning styles on students' reasoning abilities.<br />Furthermore, mathematical reasoning ability of students who have who have a visual<br />learning style is better than students who have an auditory and kinesthetic learning<br />style. While students who have kinesthetic learning styles are better than students<br />who have auditory learning styles. There is no interaction between the treatment of<br />learning with the learning styles category of students. Means, there is no difference<br />in the effect between the learning treatment and learning styles of students on the<br />ability of mathematical reasoning on students with the treatment of learning using<br />the Realistic Mathematics Education model or using conventional learning models.<br /></span><span class="fontstyle0">Key Word</span><span class="fontstyle2">: Realistic Mathematical Education Model, Mathematical<br />Reasoning Ability, Learning Styles</span> <br /><br />

scholarly journals Mathematical Communication Profiles on Learning Styles in Solving High School Level Mathematics Problems

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Wiwik Andriani ◽  
Nurmayaningsih Nurmayaningsih
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Mathematical Ideas ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematics Problems ◽  
Mathematical Problems

This study aims to see the mathematics communication of students in terms of learning styles in solving high school mathematics problems. The focus of this research is: students' mathematics communication in terms of visual learning styles, mathematics communication in terms of auditory learning styles, mathematics communication in terms of kinesthetic learning styles. The subjects of this study were students at SMA Negeri 1 Gowa who were grouped based on their learning styles. The research instrument is the researcher himself, because the researcher himself plans what to ask the research subjects. Data collection techniques are carried out by providing learning style questionnaires, carrying out written tests to see mathematical communication skills, and interview guidelines. This study used technical triangulation with data analysis techniques, namely data presentation, data reduction, and conclusions. The results of this study indicate that the level of mathematics communication can be seen from the learning styles of students. Students with visual and auditory learning styles are able to solve mathematical problems completely and in detail, are able to use mathematical ideas, are able to use mathematical notations and symbols to determine answer conclusions. Students who have a kinesthetic learning style are also able to solve mathematical problems in their own style and way, namely a shorter way, being able to use mathematical ideas, symbols and mathematical notations in solving problems, but they do not provide conclusions from the answers that are done

scholarly journals Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Thailand di Universitas Islam Riau

GERAM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Muhammad Mukhlis
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Foreign Students ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Lecture Material ◽  
Lecture Method ◽  
Good Learning

Learning styles are the ways, attitudes, and habits undertaken by students to gain comfort in learning. In this case, the researcher analyzed the foreign students’ learning style from Thailand who are studying at the Islamic University of Riau. The result of study showed that foreign students’ learning style from Thailand tended to use Kinesthetic learning style. This was based on research findings, learning style that has the highest value of kinestetik with an average of 84.6%, followed by an auditory learning style with an average of 76.9% and then visual learning style with an average of 61.5 %. As the findings in research are: First, for visual learning style students prefered to use the media in the lecture process. They were more able to concentrate when the lecturer explains the lecture material when looking at the face. Students could not memorize the material while listening to music. Students understood the material written on the board rather than read more quickly. Second, for auditory learning style, students prefered their lecturers by using lecture method. Students more easily remembered well the lecture material during the discussion. Students will lose concentration, when they heard a noise. Students prefered to discuss with friends if they find problems learning. Third, for students' kinesthetic learning styles along with. Students were more interested in lectures that are in practice. Students memorized the material while walking more dominant. when studying students could not read quickly. The findings could certainly be an input for educators in order to absorb, organize, and suit the learning strategies with learning styles, so as to show good learning outcomes and will be in accordance with lecture objectives

scholarly journals THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS' LEARNING STYLES AND THEIR EFFECTS ON GRADE POINT AVERAGE (GPA) ACHIEVEMENT

EDUTECH ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Natalia Rosa Keliat
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Grade Point Average ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Biology Education ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Grade Point ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
One Way Anova

Abstract. Learning style is one of the important factors  needed to absorb, store and process the new information. This research is a study to see the profile and percentage of studenst learning styles of SWCU Biology Education students and the influence of different learning styles on the GPA obtained. Researcher got the data of  students’ learning styles by using questionnaire.  The statistical procedures employed in this study were one-way ANOVA. The results showed  that the largest percentage of learning styles that were used  by the students of biology education were auditory learning styles by 32% and the VAK (Visual Auditory Kinesthetic) learning style was the least used by education students by 2%. The analysis of the percentage of learning styles showed that 72% of students with auditory learning styles reached a satisfactory category until magna cum laude, but the percentage of students that used VAK (Visual Auditory Kinesthetic ) learning styles only reached satisfying GPA level. Statistical test results in this study demonstrated that the use of learning styles did not give significantly different effect on the students’ GPA.Keywords: Personal Learning Styles, Grade Point Average  Abstrak. Gaya belajar adalah salah satu faktor penting yang diperlukan untuk menyerap, menyimpan dan memproses informasi baru. Penelitian ini adalah suatu penelitian untuk melihat profil dan persentase gaya belajar mahasiswa pendidikan biologi UKSW serta pengaruh gaya belajar yang berbeda terhadap indeks prestasi kumulatif yang diperoleh. Peneliti mendapatkan data gaya belajar mahasiswa dengan menggunakan kuesoner (angket). Prosedur statistik yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah one way ANOVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan  bahwa persentase gaya belajar terbesar yang digunakan mahasiswa pendidikan biologi untuk belajar adalah gaya belajar auditorik sebanyak 32%, Persentase gaya belajar yang paling sedikit digunakan oleh mahasiswa pendidikan adalah gaya belajar VAK (Visual Auditorik Kinestetik) sebanyak 2%. Analisis persentase gaya belajar menunjukkan persentase mahasiswa pendidikan biologi dengan gaya belajar auditorik adalah yang terbanyak memiliki IPK yang termasuk dalam kategori memuaskan sampai magna cum laude sebesar 72%, namun ternyata persentase mahasiswa dengan gaya belajar VAK (Visual Auditorik Kinestetik) tidak mencapai IPK memuaskan, dan hanya mencapai level kurang. Hasil uji statistik dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan penggunaan gaya belajar tidak memberikan pengaruh yang berbeda secara signifikan terhadap indeks prestasi kumulatif mahasiswa.Kata Kunci : Gaya Belajar, Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif

scholarly journals Students’ Achievement Levels, Gender, and Learning Styles on Abstract Algebra: A Profile of Evidence Developing Ability

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-16
Author(s):  
Leo Adhar Effendi ◽  
Sindi Amelia
Keyword(s):  
Academic Achievement ◽  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Abstract Algebra ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Education Department ◽  
Algebra Students ◽  
Achievement Data ◽  
And Gender

Mathematics education students’ ability on developing evidence needs to be reviewed by lecturers. 50% of the subjects in the mathematics education departement require students' accuracy in analyzing mathematical statements. This is increasingly important because the Indonesian National Qualifications Framework (KKNI) for the Bachelor level requires graduates to become technicians / analysts. The diversity of levels of students’ ability, gender, and learning styles are assumsed to be the discrepancy abilities to develop evidence. This study aims to describe the evidence developing ability based on the levels of achievement, gender, and student learning styles. The subjects of this study were abstact algebra students in the mathematics education department. Type of this research was descriptive qualitative with data collection techniques using test and non-test techniques. Students were given five questions about abstact algebra that demanded the evidence developing ability. The achivement levels and gender were obtained from students’ academic achievement data. The learning styles were attained from questionnaires. The results of the study is higher the students’ academic achievement, better the evidence developing ability on Abstract Algebra. The gender does not affect the evidence developing ability on Abstact Algebra. Students with visual learning styles have the ability to develop evidence better than students with other learning styles.

scholarly journals Kemampuan literasi matematika siswa SMP ditinjau dari gaya belajar

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-240
Author(s):  
Muhammad Syawahid ◽  
Susilahudin Putrawangsa
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Mathematical Literacy ◽  
Wrong Answer ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematics Literacy ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Math Literacy

[Bahasa]: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis kemampuan literasi matematika siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMPN 1 Mataram kelas VII. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah 3 siswa dari 82 siswa kelas VIIIA dan VIIIB yang masing-masing memiliki gaya belajar auditori, visual dan kinestetis. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu angket gaya belajar dan tes kemampuan literasi matematika. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif untuk menggambarkan hasil tes literasi matematika siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Siswa dengan gaya belajar auditori memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 4, yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1 dan 2) meskipun mereka kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika dengan level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4). 2) Siswa dengan gaya belajar visual memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 3 yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4) dan tidak mampu menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1 dan 2). 3) Siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetis memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 4 yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1) dan level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4). Pada soal nomor 2 (level 4) siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetis kurang teliti sehingga jawaban yang dihasilkan salah.  Kata kunci: Literasi Matematika; Gaya Belajar; Auditori; Visual; Kinestetis [English]: This research aims to describe and analyze student’s mathematic literacy referring to learning style. This research was conducted at SMPN 1 Mataram for VIII class. The subjects are 3 students from 82 students of class VIIIA dan VIIIB who respectively have auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning style. The method used in this research is qualitative. Instruments used in this research are a questionnaire of learning style and tests of mathematical literacy. Data analysis was conducted descriptively to portray students’ mathematics literacy referring to learning styles. This research shows that: 1) The students with auditory learning style are in the 4th level of mathematical literacy, it is indicated by their ability in solving 4th level math literacy problem (question 1 and 2) although they have difficulties in solving 3th level math literacy problem (questions 3 and 4). 2) The students with visual learning styles are in 3rd level of mathematical literacy indicated by their ability to solve 3rd level math literacy problems (questions 3 and 4) and can’t solve the 4th level math literacy problem (questions 1 and 2). 3) The students with kinesthetic learning styles have 4th level of mathematical literacy shown by their ability to solve 4th level of math literacy problems (question 1) and 3rd  level (question 3 and 4). They are less accurate in solving question 2 (4th level) so as they have wrong answer.  Keywords: Mathematics Literacy; Learning Style; Auditory; Visual; Kinesthetic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document