scholarly journals Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika (IAIM NU) Metro

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-114
Author(s):  
Santi Widyawati
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Islamic Studies ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematics Program ◽  
Student Grades

Learning style is one of the factors that allegedly affect the learning achievement (GPA) of Mathematics Education Mathematics Program of Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Institute of Islamic Studies. The purpose of this research is to know "whether there is influence of learning style type (Visual, Auditorial, and kinestetik) to student learning achievement of Mathematics Education Program of Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Islamic Institute of Mathematics”. The type of this research is comparative causal research with 3 × 1 research design. The population in this research is all students of semester IV of Mathematics Education program of Maarif Islamic Institute Nahdatul Ulama Metro academic year 2015/2016. The sample in this study was obtained by using class random technique. The sample in this study consists of 22 students with details of 10 students who have visual learning style, 4 students who have auditorial learning style, and 8 students who have kinesthetic learning style. Instruments used to collect data are questionnaire learning style and transcript of student grades semester IV of Mathematics Education Mathematics course Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Institute of Islamic Studies. Hypothesis testing in this study used a one way variance analysis with unequal cells.The result of this research is the influence of learning style to learning achievement (GPA) of Mathematics Education Mathematics Program of Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Institute of Islamic Studies. Furthermore, after further test using Scheefe 'method, it was found that students with visual learning styles had the same learning achievement with students with auditorial learning style, while both types of learning styles had better learning achievement compared with students with kinesthetic learning style.

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran JUCAMA Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Mata Kuliah Berbicara di Prodi PBSI IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Darmuki ◽  
Ahmad Hariyadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Level I ◽  
Better Than

Focus this is research to determine which are the achievements of better speaking learning: (1), learning model JUCAMA or Conventional, (2) Visual, auditory, or kinesthetic, (3) On models learning JUCAMA,  which are the achievements of better speaking learning, visual, auditory, or kinesthetic.This type of research is quasi-experimental with 2 × 3 factorial design. The population of this research is all students of PBSI IKSI PGRI Bojonegoro Study Program, which consists of nine classes with a total of 288 students. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling, selected three classes, namely the level of I-A, IB, and IC. The sample consisted of 93 students, with details of 31 IA students as an experiment, 31 IB level students as a control, and 31 IC level students as a trial. Data collection instruments using learning style questionnaires, and learning achievement tests that have been validated by the validators. The test instrument was tested in PBSI level I study program after being tested and then analyzed its reliability, distinguishing features and difficulty levels. The prerequisite tests include the normality test using the Lilliefors method and the variance homogeneity test using the Bartlett method. With α = 0.05, it can be concluded that the sample comes from populations that are normally distributed and have a homogeneous variance.In this study it can be concluded that: (1) students with learning JUCAMA had speaking learning achievement better than the students with conventional learning, (2) achievement of learning speaking students who have a visual learning style is better than the speaking learning achievement of students who have auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. While the speaking achievement students who have learning styles of auditory as well as students who have a kinesthetic learning style, (3) On learning JUCAMA, there is no difference between speaking achievement in each learning style. Keyword: jucama, learning style, learning achievement, speaking

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran STAD Berbantuan Geogebra pada Materi Similaritas Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2017 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Wawan Wawan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Achievement In Mathematics

The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of Learning model of STAD geogebra viewed from learning style. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 2 × 3. The population was entirely the students 4thof Mathematics Education Program Ma’arif Institute of Metro Lampung in Academic Year 2015/2016. The samples of the research were taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 50 students consisted of 26 students in the first experimental class and 24 students in the control class. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in mathematics and student learning styles questionnaire. The data was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusionsof thisresearchwere as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of STAD Geogebra type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. (2) Students with visual learning style have the same achievement with students with auditory learning styles. Students with auditory learning style have the same achievement with students with kinesthetic learning styles. Students with visual learning styles have a better academic achievement than students with kinesthetic learning styles. (3) Difference in achievement of each learning method was not consistent with their respective learning styles and differences between individual learning style also was not consistent in each learning method Keywords: geogebra, power point, STAD

scholarly journals PROFIL KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN INDUKTIF MATEMATIKA MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA UNIPA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Agus Haryono ◽  
Benidiktus Tanujaya
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Inductive Reasoning ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problems

<p>The purpose of this research was to study the profile of students' mathematical inductive reasoning abilities regarding visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles in solving mathematical problems. The research method used is qualitative with a descriptive approach. The results of the study showed that UNIPA mathematics education students tended to study with Visual Learning Styles. Students with this learning style tend to have inductive mathematical reasoning abilities that are better than inductive mathematical reasoning abilities of students learning with auditorial learning styles and those who learn with the kinesthetic learning style. Also, Mathematics Education students of the University of Papua do not have the ability to examine the validity of an argument and find patterns or characteristics of mathematical symptoms to generalize.</p>

PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF STAD DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI 054938 ALUR DUA KECAMATAN SEI LEPAN PANGKALAN BRANDAN KABUPATEN LANGKAT

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Uthman Uthman
Keyword(s):  
Primary School ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Instructional Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Education Of Students

The objectives of this research were to discover: (1) the difference in learning<br />achievement of Islam Religion Education of students taught by cooperative<br />instructional strategy STAD type and student taught by expository instructional<br />strategy, (2) the a difference of learning style Islam Religion education with visual,<br />auditory and kinesthetic, learning style, and (3) the interaction between instructional<br />strategy and learning style in affecting learning achievement of learning style Islam<br />religion education. The population was Grade V students of Primary School Inti<br />Number SD Negeri 054938 Alur Dua Sei Lepan Pangkalan Brandan Langkat regency<br />consisting of three classes. The sample chosen for instructional class using STAD was<br />class Vc with 40 students, while those taught by expository was class Vb with 40<br />students. The results of the findings were: (1) the average of Islam Religion Education<br />of students taught by STAD instructional strategy ( X = 29,95) was higher than the<br />average of students taught by expositoyi instructional strategy ( X = 28,62) with Fcount<br />= 12,46 &gt; Ftable = 3, 972), the avarage learning achievement of Islam religion education<br />with kinesthetic learning style ( X = 29,77) and visual learning style ( X = 25.35) with<br />Fcount = 5,92 &gt; Ftable = 3,972, and (3) there was an interaction between instructional<br />strategy and learning style toward students learning achievement Islam Religion<br />education with Fcount = 23.84 &gt; Ftable = 3,972.

scholarly journals Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Thailand di Universitas Islam Riau

GERAM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Muhammad Mukhlis
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Foreign Students ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Lecture Material ◽  
Lecture Method ◽  
Good Learning

Learning styles are the ways, attitudes, and habits undertaken by students to gain comfort in learning. In this case, the researcher analyzed the foreign students’ learning style from Thailand who are studying at the Islamic University of Riau. The result of study showed that foreign students’ learning style from Thailand tended to use Kinesthetic learning style. This was based on research findings, learning style that has the highest value of kinestetik with an average of 84.6%, followed by an auditory learning style with an average of 76.9% and then visual learning style with an average of 61.5 %. As the findings in research are: First, for visual learning style students prefered to use the media in the lecture process. They were more able to concentrate when the lecturer explains the lecture material when looking at the face. Students could not memorize the material while listening to music. Students understood the material written on the board rather than read more quickly. Second, for auditory learning style, students prefered their lecturers by using lecture method. Students more easily remembered well the lecture material during the discussion. Students will lose concentration, when they heard a noise. Students prefered to discuss with friends if they find problems learning. Third, for students' kinesthetic learning styles along with. Students were more interested in lectures that are in practice. Students memorized the material while walking more dominant. when studying students could not read quickly. The findings could certainly be an input for educators in order to absorb, organize, and suit the learning strategies with learning styles, so as to show good learning outcomes and will be in accordance with lecture objectives

scholarly journals Kemampuan literasi matematika siswa SMP ditinjau dari gaya belajar

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-240
Author(s):  
Muhammad Syawahid ◽  
Susilahudin Putrawangsa
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Mathematical Literacy ◽  
Wrong Answer ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematics Literacy ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Math Literacy

[Bahasa]: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis kemampuan literasi matematika siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMPN 1 Mataram kelas VII. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah 3 siswa dari 82 siswa kelas VIIIA dan VIIIB yang masing-masing memiliki gaya belajar auditori, visual dan kinestetis. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu angket gaya belajar dan tes kemampuan literasi matematika. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif untuk menggambarkan hasil tes literasi matematika siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Siswa dengan gaya belajar auditori memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 4, yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1 dan 2) meskipun mereka kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika dengan level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4). 2) Siswa dengan gaya belajar visual memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 3 yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4) dan tidak mampu menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1 dan 2). 3) Siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetis memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 4 yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1) dan level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4). Pada soal nomor 2 (level 4) siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetis kurang teliti sehingga jawaban yang dihasilkan salah.  Kata kunci: Literasi Matematika; Gaya Belajar; Auditori; Visual; Kinestetis [English]: This research aims to describe and analyze student’s mathematic literacy referring to learning style. This research was conducted at SMPN 1 Mataram for VIII class. The subjects are 3 students from 82 students of class VIIIA dan VIIIB who respectively have auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning style. The method used in this research is qualitative. Instruments used in this research are a questionnaire of learning style and tests of mathematical literacy. Data analysis was conducted descriptively to portray students’ mathematics literacy referring to learning styles. This research shows that: 1) The students with auditory learning style are in the 4th level of mathematical literacy, it is indicated by their ability in solving 4th level math literacy problem (question 1 and 2) although they have difficulties in solving 3th level math literacy problem (questions 3 and 4). 2) The students with visual learning styles are in 3rd level of mathematical literacy indicated by their ability to solve 3rd level math literacy problems (questions 3 and 4) and can’t solve the 4th level math literacy problem (questions 1 and 2). 3) The students with kinesthetic learning styles have 4th level of mathematical literacy shown by their ability to solve 4th level of math literacy problems (question 1) and 3rd  level (question 3 and 4). They are less accurate in solving question 2 (4th level) so as they have wrong answer.  Keywords: Mathematics Literacy; Learning Style; Auditory; Visual; Kinesthetic

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneous Population ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes

scholarly journals Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-92
Author(s):  
Supriyanto Supriyanto ◽  
Isbandiyah Isbandiyah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Education Program ◽  
History Education ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Education Study ◽  
The Subject

The study aims to describe the tendency of students learning style at History Education Study Program of STKIP-PGRI Lubuklinggau.  The study was a descriptive study. the subject of the study was the history students in Strategi Belajar Mengajar class. The techniques to collect the data were observation and questionnaire. The data were analyzed descriptively. The results showed that students' learning styles include visual was10,26%, audio was 15,38%, kinesthetic 46% , audiovisual was 5,13%, visual-kinesthetic was 7,69%, audio-  kinesthetic was 15,38%. The most preferred leaning style was kinesthetic.  In conclusion, the most preferred learning style of students in history education program was kinesthetic learning style Keywords: Learning Styles, Tendency

scholarly journals PENGARUH CARA MENGAJAR GURU TERHADAP HASIL PRESTASI SISWA

JENTRE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
Niar Yuniarti
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Teacher Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Teaching Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
Learning Achievement

The research departs from the belief that in addition to the teacher style in teaching the students, the teacher's learning style also affects the learning achievement students have gained. This research uses quantitative research. The research subject is 30 teachers of Madrasa in the Ministry of Religious Affairs who have followed a training. To support the research, questionnaire, interview, and observation were used as primary and secondary data. The results conclude that the teacher's learning style is much more visually compared to other styles of learning, the visual learning style focuses on vision. It shows that teacher learning styles have no correlation with the teacher's teaching style. In verificative analysis also gained the teacher's teaching style is lower to the student's learning outcomes.

scholarly journals Students' Mathematical Connection Skills Reviewed From Learning Styles

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ujang Suprianto ◽  
Heni Pujiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Connections ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mathematical Connection ◽  
Student Learning Styles

The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of student learning styles, to determine the average mathematical communication skills that have Auditory, Visual, and Kinestatic learning styles. and to find out if there are significant differences in the ability of mathematical connections between students who have auditory, visual, and kinesthetic learning styles. This research was conducted at SMAN 17 Pandeglang in class XII MIPA. The instrument used was in the form of a learning style questionnaire and a test of mathematical connection abilities. This type of research is a comparative study with a quantitative approach. Based on the results of data processing, that the distribution of student learning styles is included in the Auditory learning style of 34% of students, Visual 46% of students, and Kinesthetic 19% of students. By using a scale of 0-50, the average mathematical connection ability of students is 29.58, whereas when viewed from each distribution of learning styles, the average mathematical ability of auditory students is 24.89, visual students 28.33, and kinestatic students 34,40. Based on the results of the analysis with the ANOVA test and t test (Dunnet) that there is a significant difference in the ability of students' mathematical connections between auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning styles with a significant level of ? = 0.05, and the results of the value of Fcount &gt; Ftable = 3.62 &gt; 3,42, where the kinesthetic learning style has higher mathematical connection ability than auditory and visual learning styles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document