scholarly journals THE PROFILE OF STUDENTS' LEARNING STYLES AND THEIR EFFECTS ON GRADE POINT AVERAGE (GPA) ACHIEVEMENT

EDUTECH ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Natalia Rosa Keliat
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Grade Point Average ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Biology Education ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Grade Point ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
One Way Anova

Abstract. Learning style is one of the important factors  needed to absorb, store and process the new information. This research is a study to see the profile and percentage of studenst learning styles of SWCU Biology Education students and the influence of different learning styles on the GPA obtained. Researcher got the data of  students’ learning styles by using questionnaire.  The statistical procedures employed in this study were one-way ANOVA. The results showed  that the largest percentage of learning styles that were used  by the students of biology education were auditory learning styles by 32% and the VAK (Visual Auditory Kinesthetic) learning style was the least used by education students by 2%. The analysis of the percentage of learning styles showed that 72% of students with auditory learning styles reached a satisfactory category until magna cum laude, but the percentage of students that used VAK (Visual Auditory Kinesthetic ) learning styles only reached satisfying GPA level. Statistical test results in this study demonstrated that the use of learning styles did not give significantly different effect on the students’ GPA.Keywords: Personal Learning Styles, Grade Point Average  Abstrak. Gaya belajar adalah salah satu faktor penting yang diperlukan untuk menyerap, menyimpan dan memproses informasi baru. Penelitian ini adalah suatu penelitian untuk melihat profil dan persentase gaya belajar mahasiswa pendidikan biologi UKSW serta pengaruh gaya belajar yang berbeda terhadap indeks prestasi kumulatif yang diperoleh. Peneliti mendapatkan data gaya belajar mahasiswa dengan menggunakan kuesoner (angket). Prosedur statistik yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah one way ANOVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan  bahwa persentase gaya belajar terbesar yang digunakan mahasiswa pendidikan biologi untuk belajar adalah gaya belajar auditorik sebanyak 32%, Persentase gaya belajar yang paling sedikit digunakan oleh mahasiswa pendidikan adalah gaya belajar VAK (Visual Auditorik Kinestetik) sebanyak 2%. Analisis persentase gaya belajar menunjukkan persentase mahasiswa pendidikan biologi dengan gaya belajar auditorik adalah yang terbanyak memiliki IPK yang termasuk dalam kategori memuaskan sampai magna cum laude sebesar 72%, namun ternyata persentase mahasiswa dengan gaya belajar VAK (Visual Auditorik Kinestetik) tidak mencapai IPK memuaskan, dan hanya mencapai level kurang. Hasil uji statistik dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan penggunaan gaya belajar tidak memberikan pengaruh yang berbeda secara signifikan terhadap indeks prestasi kumulatif mahasiswa.Kata Kunci : Gaya Belajar, Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif

scholarly journals PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN SISWA KELAS X SMK NEGERI 1 BALIGE

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Novalina Evodya Tumanggor ◽  
Abdul Muin Sibuea
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Civic Education ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Citizenship Education ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan siswa yang diajar dengan metode pembelajaran simulasi lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan siswa yang diajar dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar pendidikan kewarganegaraan siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar auditori, dan (3) interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Metode penelitian ini adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis varian dua jalur (ANAVA 2 x 2) dengan taraf = 0,05, dan diuji dengan menggunakan uji Tukey. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Metode pembelajaran simulasi memberikan hasil belajar Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan siswa yang lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) Kelompok siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik memperoleh skor hasil belajar Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan yang lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan kelompok siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar auditori; (3) Terdapat interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dengan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Kata Kunci: metode pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar pendidikan kewarganegaraan Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) the learning outcomes Citizenship Education students who are taught by the teaching methods of simulation is higher than the result of learning Citizenship Education students who are taught by the method of expository, (2) the learning outcomes of civic education of students who have a kinesthetic learning style higher than students who have auditory learning styles, and (3) the interaction between teaching methods and learning styles in influencing learning outcomes Citizenship Education. This research method is a quasi-experimental design with 2 x 2 factorial analysis technique used is the analysis of variance of two lanes (ANOVA 2 x 2) with a level of α = 0.05, and tested using Tukey test. The results showed that: (1) The learning method simulation results Citizenship Education students learn better when compared with expository teaching methods; (2) The group of students who have obtained a score of kinesthetic learning style Citizenship Education learning outcomes are better when compared with a group of students who have auditory learning style; (3) There is an interaction between the learning method with learning styles in influencing learning outcomes Citizenship Education. Keywords: teaching methods, learning styles, learning outcomes civic education

scholarly journals Analisis Analisis Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pecahan ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

KadikmA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Ayu Imamatul Muslimah
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Basic Skills ◽  
Learning Abilities ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Interview Method ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Thinking Processes

In learning activities, one of the efforts that can be done to improve students' learning abilities is to support learning styles that are following the objectives so that learning can be done effectively. This research was conducted at Junior High School 1 Kalisat, located at Jl. Diponegoro 52 Kalisat, Jember. This study aims to describe the students' critical thinking processes in solving fraction problems in terms of visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. Data collection techniques used consisted of learning style questionnaires, critical thinking tests, and interview method. The subjects in this study were 6 students consisting of 2 students who represented visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. Based on data analysis, the results show that students with a visual and kinesthetic learning style meet five indicators of critical thinking, namely basic clarification, basic skills, concluding, further clarification, and strategies and tactics. Students with auditory learning styles meet the four indicators of critical thinking namely basic clarification, building basic skills, further clarification, and concluding. While students with auditory learning styles are less able to meet the indicators of strategies and tactics. Keywords: Critical Thinking, Learning Styles, Fraction Problems

scholarly journals KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN TEORI VAN HIELE PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
Fajar Hendro Utomo ◽  
Indah Setyo Wardhani ◽  
Muhammad Abdul Roziq Asrori
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Van Hiele ◽  
Construct Definition ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Van Hiele Theory ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

This objective of this study is to describe competency of mathematic communication based on Van Hiele theory on geometry course viewed from visual and kinesthetic learning styles.  The study was conducted in STKIP PGRI Tulungagung in November 2013 to August 2014, assigning 45 students as sample.  The study revealed that: First,  auditory learning style was achieved by: Level 1 = 0, Level 2 = 2, Level 3 = 9, Level 4 = 4, and Level 5 = 0, averaging at Level 3.  This means that students do not understand when they construct  definition, argument, role, formal deduction they worked;  Second, kinesthetic learning style was achieved by: Level 1 = 0, Level 2 = 6, Level 3 = 10, Level 4 = 2, and Level 5 = 0, averaging at Level 3.  This means that students do not understand on the work as done through auditory learning style.

scholarly journals Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Thailand di Universitas Islam Riau

GERAM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Muhammad Mukhlis
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Foreign Students ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Lecture Material ◽  
Lecture Method ◽  
Good Learning

Learning styles are the ways, attitudes, and habits undertaken by students to gain comfort in learning. In this case, the researcher analyzed the foreign students’ learning style from Thailand who are studying at the Islamic University of Riau. The result of study showed that foreign students’ learning style from Thailand tended to use Kinesthetic learning style. This was based on research findings, learning style that has the highest value of kinestetik with an average of 84.6%, followed by an auditory learning style with an average of 76.9% and then visual learning style with an average of 61.5 %. As the findings in research are: First, for visual learning style students prefered to use the media in the lecture process. They were more able to concentrate when the lecturer explains the lecture material when looking at the face. Students could not memorize the material while listening to music. Students understood the material written on the board rather than read more quickly. Second, for auditory learning style, students prefered their lecturers by using lecture method. Students more easily remembered well the lecture material during the discussion. Students will lose concentration, when they heard a noise. Students prefered to discuss with friends if they find problems learning. Third, for students' kinesthetic learning styles along with. Students were more interested in lectures that are in practice. Students memorized the material while walking more dominant. when studying students could not read quickly. The findings could certainly be an input for educators in order to absorb, organize, and suit the learning strategies with learning styles, so as to show good learning outcomes and will be in accordance with lecture objectives

scholarly journals Correlation Learning Style with Grade Point Average Fourth Year Medical Student

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (T3) ◽  
pp. 358-361
Author(s):  
Resti Rahmadika Akbar ◽  
Elvinas Sari Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Grade Point Average ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Model Learning ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Important Indicator ◽  
Grade Point

BACKGROUND: Learning achievement is an important indicator to determine the learning and teaching process, each student has a different learning style. Student learning learns how they choose the suitable method and the results obtained optimally. A student must also learn their learning styles to choose methods or ways of learning that are appropriate to their character. AIM: Knowing the relationship between learning style and cumulative Grade Point Average (GPA) of 4th-year students at the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Baiturrahmah. METHODS: The scope of this research covers the fields of medical science, especially medical education, correlative analytical research with cross-sectional design. The study was conducted at the Medical Faculty Universitas Baiturrahma. The study was conducted from May to January 2019. The affordable population in this study were 4th-year students numbered 80 students with the Simple Random Sampling technique. Data analysis was univariately presented in the form of a frequency distribution table and bivariate analysis using the correlation test using the SPSS program. RESULTS: At most with female gender, namely (71.3%), the highest place is at most boarding, namely (77.5%), most have quad-model learning styles, namely (80%), most have a GPA graduated that is (61.3%), there is a relationship between the learning style and the GPA of 4th-year medical students with a value of p = 0.024 (p < 0.05) and r = 0.0253. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the 4th-year medical students have the most female sex, the most places to live are boarding, quad-model learning style, and there is a correlation between learning styles and the 4th year GPA Medicine at Universitas Baiturrahmah.

scholarly journals Kemampuan literasi matematika siswa SMP ditinjau dari gaya belajar

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-240
Author(s):  
Muhammad Syawahid ◽  
Susilahudin Putrawangsa
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Mathematical Literacy ◽  
Wrong Answer ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematics Literacy ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Math Literacy

[Bahasa]: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis kemampuan literasi matematika siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMPN 1 Mataram kelas VII. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah 3 siswa dari 82 siswa kelas VIIIA dan VIIIB yang masing-masing memiliki gaya belajar auditori, visual dan kinestetis. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu angket gaya belajar dan tes kemampuan literasi matematika. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif untuk menggambarkan hasil tes literasi matematika siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Siswa dengan gaya belajar auditori memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 4, yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1 dan 2) meskipun mereka kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika dengan level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4). 2) Siswa dengan gaya belajar visual memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 3 yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4) dan tidak mampu menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1 dan 2). 3) Siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetis memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 4 yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1) dan level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4). Pada soal nomor 2 (level 4) siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetis kurang teliti sehingga jawaban yang dihasilkan salah.  Kata kunci: Literasi Matematika; Gaya Belajar; Auditori; Visual; Kinestetis [English]: This research aims to describe and analyze student’s mathematic literacy referring to learning style. This research was conducted at SMPN 1 Mataram for VIII class. The subjects are 3 students from 82 students of class VIIIA dan VIIIB who respectively have auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning style. The method used in this research is qualitative. Instruments used in this research are a questionnaire of learning style and tests of mathematical literacy. Data analysis was conducted descriptively to portray students’ mathematics literacy referring to learning styles. This research shows that: 1) The students with auditory learning style are in the 4th level of mathematical literacy, it is indicated by their ability in solving 4th level math literacy problem (question 1 and 2) although they have difficulties in solving 3th level math literacy problem (questions 3 and 4). 2) The students with visual learning styles are in 3rd level of mathematical literacy indicated by their ability to solve 3rd level math literacy problems (questions 3 and 4) and can’t solve the 4th level math literacy problem (questions 1 and 2). 3) The students with kinesthetic learning styles have 4th level of mathematical literacy shown by their ability to solve 4th level of math literacy problems (question 1) and 3rd  level (question 3 and 4). They are less accurate in solving question 2 (4th level) so as they have wrong answer.  Keywords: Mathematics Literacy; Learning Style; Auditory; Visual; Kinesthetic

scholarly journals Students' Mathematical Connection Skills Reviewed From Learning Styles

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ujang Suprianto ◽  
Heni Pujiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Connections ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mathematical Connection ◽  
Student Learning Styles

The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of student learning styles, to determine the average mathematical communication skills that have Auditory, Visual, and Kinestatic learning styles. and to find out if there are significant differences in the ability of mathematical connections between students who have auditory, visual, and kinesthetic learning styles. This research was conducted at SMAN 17 Pandeglang in class XII MIPA. The instrument used was in the form of a learning style questionnaire and a test of mathematical connection abilities. This type of research is a comparative study with a quantitative approach. Based on the results of data processing, that the distribution of student learning styles is included in the Auditory learning style of 34% of students, Visual 46% of students, and Kinesthetic 19% of students. By using a scale of 0-50, the average mathematical connection ability of students is 29.58, whereas when viewed from each distribution of learning styles, the average mathematical ability of auditory students is 24.89, visual students 28.33, and kinestatic students 34,40. Based on the results of the analysis with the ANOVA test and t test (Dunnet) that there is a significant difference in the ability of students' mathematical connections between auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning styles with a significant level of ? = 0.05, and the results of the value of Fcount &gt; Ftable = 3.62 &gt; 3,42, where the kinesthetic learning style has higher mathematical connection ability than auditory and visual learning styles.

scholarly journals PROSES BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA REALISTIK MATERI GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Finsensius Yesekiel Naja ◽  
Agustina Mei ◽  
Sofia Sa'o
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Thinking Processes

The purpose of this study is to describe the profile of students' critical thinking in solving realistic mathematical problems of geometry material in terms of learning styles. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. Critical thinking in this study refers to critical thinking with FRISCO criteria. In this study, subjects were taken from students of class VII SMP N 2 Ende Selatan. Each student's research subjects have visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. Data collection is done by providing a Problem Solving Test (TPM) and an interview. The results obtained, subjects who have a visual learning style, critical thinking processes in solving realistic mathematical problems, able to understand problems, the subject has not been able to determine ways to solve problems, the subject has not been able to carry out the settlement and the subject does not re-examine. Subjects who have auditory learning styles, critical thinking profiles in solving realistic mathematical problems are able to understand problems, but the subject does not re-examine. Subjects who have kinesthetic learning styles of critical thinking processes in solving realistic mathematical problems are able to understand problems, are able to plan problems, subjects can carry out well and check the results.

scholarly journals Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas VII

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-211
Author(s):  
Eva Nurdiana ◽  
Ketut Sarjana ◽  
Muhammad Turmuzi ◽  
Sri Subarinah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Story Problems ◽  
Test Question ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
The Subject

This study aims to find out the ability to solve math story problems reviewed from the learning style of grade VII students. The type of research used is descriptive research with qualitative approach. The sample class was selected using cluster random sampling techniques and obtained 32 students who were taken 25% of the population, the sample was randomly taken 8 students from each class. The samples obtained were given a study style questionnaire in order to classify the sample into visual, auditorial and kinesthetic learning style categories. The sample that was the subject of the interview and the subject given the test question was selected based on the three categories of study style, which was taken randomly 20% of the sample of each learning style. Students' ability to solve math story problems is reviewed from known learning styles through analysis of students' answers in solving number material story questions and based on interview results. The analysis technique used is descriptive statistical analysis. From the results of the study obtained: The ability to solve math story problems of students with visual learning style, auditory learning and kinesthetic learning is  good criteria, less criteria,and less criteria.

STUDENT’S LEARNING STYLES IN LEARNING READING COMPREHENSION

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinta sasmita And Siti Aisah Ginting
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Tenth Grade ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Auditory Learners

This study is about student’s learning styles in learning reading comprehension. The design of this research was descriptive research. The data were collected by using questionnaires and observation sheet. The subject of the study are the XI AP 2 of SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat and the object of the study are the students learning styles in learning reading comprehension. The data were analyzed by using Fleming theory. The purpose of conducting this research was find out whether the most dominant learning style in reading comprehension and to find out what are the types of student’s learning styles which has higher achievement in reading comprehension of XI grade in SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat in academic 2016/2017. There were 32 students as the subject of this research. In this case, the researcher collected the data by using learning style questionnaire and observation. The result showed that auditory learning style is the most dominant learning style at the tenth grade students at SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat, the percentage was 71,87%, it means 23 from 32 students prefer to hear than read and move. The second was kinesthetic learning style, the score, 21,88%, means that only 7 students prefer to move. Then, visual learning style, score 6,25%, means that 2 from 32 students prefer to read. For the fastest student’s in reading comprehension came from auditory students or auditory learners. They get score 69,56% followed kinesthetic 21,74%, and visual 8,70%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document