scholarly journals Pengaruh Corporate Governance dan Corporate Social Responsibility terhadap Kualitas Laba dan Nilai Perusahaan

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-86
Author(s):  
Hennyta Hutapea

This study aims to examine the effect of corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure of earnings quality and firm value. Corporate governance with board diversity is measured from the aspect of age and background study of board members. CSR disclosure in the company’s annual report is measured by the score of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). This study measures the company’s earnings quality with discretionary accruals (DA), and the firm value with tobin’s q ratio. This study use a sample of 160 non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI), so the total observations in this study are 640 samples. The result of this study provide empirical evidence that age and background study of board members don’t affect the quality of earnings and firm value, but the CSR activities affect the firm value.

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-354
Author(s):  
Kamaliah Kamaliah

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of corporate governance and corporate profitability on firm value with corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure as the intervening variable. Design/methodology/approach The population of this study was all companies listed in the LQ 45 Index group in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2014. The inferential statistics used in this study applied the partial least square (PLS) based structural equation model (SEM) method with the assistance of SmartPLS 2.0. The PLS method was selected based on the consideration that there was a construct formed with reflective indicators in this study. Findings From the results of this study, it can be concluded that corporate governance does not have any effect on CSR disclosure, profitability of company has an effect on CSR disclosure, CSR disclosure has an effect on firm value. In addition, CSR disclosure does not mediate the effect of on firm value. These results showed that corporate governance can have an effect on firm value directly, and there is no role of CSR disclosure in mediating the effect of corporate governance on firm value, and profitability of company has an effect on firm value through CSR disclosure. Originality/value The originality of this research is on the reason that many studies that have been conducted still indicated the inconsistency in the results and diversity of the indicators, so that a similar research was conducted by involving the indicators used for measuring the corporate governance variable, which were the proportion of independent commissioners and audit committee. Meanwhile, for the profitability variable, return on assets and return on equity were used as the indicators.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 188-196
Author(s):  
Ignatius Septo Pramesworo ◽  
Tiolina Evi

This study aims to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR disclosure) on firm value. The object of this research is a state-owned company (BUMN) listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) for the 2014-2018 period. The sample selection method used in this research is purposive sampling method and the analysis technique used is multiple linear regression which includes classical assumption tests and hypothesis testing. The total sample in the study was 20 companies. The data processing in this study used the Eviews version 10. The results showed that the simultaneous effect of Good Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility on firm value. In addition, this study proves that partially institutional ownership has an effect on firm value, while CSR disclosure has no effect on firm value.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-71
Author(s):  
Novi Yanti ◽  
Sarwani Sarwani ◽  
Novika Rosari

Company value is considered necessary for interested parties both internally and externally when making investments. This study examines and analyzes the influence of Company Characteristics (Firm Size, Capital Structure, and Profitability) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure moderated by Good Corporate Governance on Firm Value. There are 188 manufacturing companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), the population with 22 sample companies in the 2016-2018 period. The sampling technique was the purposive sampling method. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression and moderated regression analysis on SPSS. This study indicates that the capital structure and good governance affect firm value, and the firm size variable shows a negative effect. Good Corporate Governance can strengthen the influence of firm size, capital structure, and CSR disclosure on firm value, while good governance weakens the effect of profitability on firm value, which is of interest. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leni Yuliyanti

The objective  of  this  research was to discover  the  effects  of  Good Corporate Governance(CGC)  and  Corporate  Social  Responsibility  (CSR)  disclosure  on  firm  value.  This  studyemployed a descriptive-verifying method. The population in this study was the companies listedin  the  IICGP ranking,  selected  through  purposive  sampling  technique.  The  data  collectiontechnique  utilized  documentation  study  with  descriptive  analysis  technique  and  classicalassumption tests;  F test  and t  test.  The results  of  the study demonstrated that  GCG gavesignificant positive effect on firm value, CSR disclosure gave significant positive effect on firmvalue, as well as GCG and CSR disclosure gave significant positive effect on firm value.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iwan Kusuma Negara

This study aims to analyze the influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) moderated by Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) toward firm value in the period of 2014-2016 by using Moderated Regression Analysis method. The population in this research consists of 25 firms listed in the SRI-KEHATI Index which is an index on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, formed by the biodiversity foundation (Kehati) by prioritizing the principles of sustainability and social responsibility.There are 11 firms selected as research samples obtained by purposive sampling technique.The data used are secondary data in the form of company annual report during the study period, which published through website www.idx.co.id. Hypotheses testing are conducted by t-test and F-test. The results showed that GCG did not have a significant effect on firm value as measured by Tobin's Q. Meanwhile, as an independent variable, CSR disclosure gave an insignificant negative effect on firm value.As a moderating variable, CSR was able to strengthen the relationship between GCG and firm value.This is because  CSR disclosure is one form of implementation of GCG, which means if the CSR disclosure getting better, it also will make the GCG better. Eventually, it will affect the change on firm value. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Good Corporate Governance (GCG) yang dimoderasi oleh Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) terhadap nilai perusahaan pada periode 2014-2016 dengan menggunakan metode Moderated Regression Analysis. Populasi dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari 25 perusahaan yang terdaftar dalam Indeks SRI-KEHATI yang merupakan indeks di Bursa Efek Indonesia, yang dibentuk oleh yayasan keanekaragaman hayati (Kehati) dengan memprioritaskan prinsip-prinsip keberlanjutan dan tanggung jawab sosial. Ada 11 perusahaan yang dipilih sebagai sampel penelitian yang diperoleh dengan teknik purposive sampling. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder dalam bentuk laporan tahunan perusahaan selama masa studi, yang dipublikasikan melalui situs web www.idx.co.id. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan uji-t dan uji-F. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa GCG tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan yang diukur dengan Tobin's Q. Sementara itu, sebagai variabel independen, pengungkapan CSR memberikan pengaruh negatif yang tidak signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Sebagai variabel moderasi, CSR mampu memperkuat hubungan antara GCG dan nilai perusahaan. Hal ini karena pengungkapan CSR adalah salah satu bentuk penerapan GCG, yang berarti jika pengungkapan CSR semakin baik, maka juga akan membuat GCG lebih baik. Akhirnya, itu akan mempengaruhi perubahan pada nilai perusahaan. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Value, Tobin's Q, Regression Analysis,SRI-KEHATIIndex. Kata Kunci: Tata Kelola Perusahaan yang Baik, Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan, Nilai Perusahaan, Tobin Q, Analisis Regresi, Indeks SRI-KEHATI.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Aurellia Adi Leksono ◽  
Sansaloni Butar Butar

This study examine the role of good corporate governance (GCG) and firm characteristics to expand corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure. CSR disclosure is measured by fraction of total items reported in Sustainability Report to 58 items index released by Global Reporting Initiative. Samples are collected from listed companies in BEI (Bursa Efek Indonesia) and have been participated in Indonesian Sustainability Report Award (ISRA during 2014-2016. As much as 22 companies have complete data for further analysis. Using multiple regression analysis, results showed that profitability have a positive effect on CSR disclosure and become the only accepted hypothesis in this research; size of board of commissioner, company size, and leverage have no effect on CSR disclosure; while audit committee meeting frequency have negative effect on CSR disclosure.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrique Formigoni ◽  
Liliane Segura ◽  
Isabel Gallego-Álvarez

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to verify if the characteristics of the board of directors (BD) affects the disclosure practices of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Two different population samples were used from the period 2008-2011: Brazilian listed companies and Spanish companies. It is observed that the size of the board positively affects CSR disclosure practices of the two groups of companies. The percentage of independent directors of the board members positively affects the disclosure practices of CSR in Spanish companies. The percentage of participants of the board women positively impacts the disclosure practices of CSR in Brazilian companies. Design/methodology/approach The authors worked with two different population samples: one, composed by the Brazilian listed companies in BM&FBOVESPA and other by Spanish companies listed on Madrid Stock Exchange. The selection of this period was due to the increase in the adoption of GRI guidelines from 2008 (Prado-Lorenzo et al., 2012). In addition, as Spanish companies disclose more CSR reports according to the GRI guidelines (Global Reporting Initiative, 2012), this is a suitable environment for the analysis. Findings Regarding the research question of this study, it was found that the profile of the board affects the disclosure practices of CSR of Brazilian and Spanish companies. The size of the board positively affects CSR disclosure practices of the two groups of companies. The percentage of independent directors of the board members positively affects the disclosure practices of CSR in Spanish companies. The percentage of participants of the board women positively impacts the disclosure practices of CSR in Brazilian companies. Research limitations/implications Both the BD of Spanish companies as the Brazilian still requires the participation of a greater number of women. It is important to remember that the variable that represents women in the board presented a positive impact on the dependent variables, and it is statistically significant, so it is possible to affirm that when a large number of women are on the Board, the company tends to disclose more standardized information about CSR practices. These results are in line to other empirical analysis that defend that women usually introduce more philanthropic worries (Ibrahim and Angelidis, 1991) and tend to provide higher information transparency, especially about sustainability issues (Barako and Brown, 2008; Prado-Lorenzo and García-Sánchez, 2010; Frías-Aceituno et al., 2012). Practical implications This research should benefit, in this sense, investors, managers and policymakers, civil society representatives and corporate managers themselves active in the two economies investigated. Social implications It should be noticed that both Brazil and Spain use to encourage joint research between researchers of Brazilian and Spanish universities, funding projects developed in partnership as Cooperation Programme signed in 2001 by the Ministries of Education in both countries. Thus, it is justified the choice of Spain for its comparative analysis due to the need for more field studies on this topic in both countries, and also that it has been promoted by their governments. Originality/value It is expected that the results of this research contribute to the identification of relevant factors in disclosure of corporate environmental policies and actions that may be useful in the decision-making process of various stakeholders. Such identification will also allow us to identify possible relationships between environmental initiatives, the profile of BD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-33
Author(s):  
Rahimah Bawai ◽  
Hermala Kusumadewi

Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of corporate governance, firm characteristics, disclosure of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firm value. It analyzes the firms which became the participants of the 2014 Sustainability Report Award. Corporate governance is proxied by the proportion of independent commissioners, while firm characteristic is proxied through the age of the firm. Meanwhile, the disclosure of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the sustainability report is stated in the Corporate Social Responsibility Index (CSRI). The firm value was calculated using the Tobins’Q formula. The hypothesis was tested using linear regression. The test results show corporate governance and firm characteristics have a positive effect on firm value. Meanwhile, corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure has a positive but insignificant effect on the dependent variable. If all independent variables are tested simultaneously, all three variables have a positive effect. However, disclosure of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has no significant effect.Keywords: corporate governance, firm characteristics, corporate social responsibility (CSR), firm value, sustainability report Pengaruh Corporate Governance, Karakteristik Perusahaan, Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) terhadap Nilai PerusahaanAbstrak: Penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh corporate governance, karakteristik perusahaan, pengungkapan corporate social responsibility (CSR) terhadap nilai perusahaan. Periode penelitian tahun 2014-2018 yang merupakan perusahaan peserta Sustainability Report Award 2014. Corporate governance diproksi dengan proporsi dewan komisaris independen. Kemudian karakteristik perusahaan diproksi melalui umur perusahaan yang dihitung dari tahun berdiri perusahaan dikurangi dengan tahun penelitian. Sedangkan pengungkapan corporate social responsibility (CSR) pada laporan sustainability report dinyatakan dalam Corporate Social Responsibility Index (CSRI) yang disyaratkan oleh Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Variabel dependen nilai perusahaan dihitung menggunakan rumus tobins’Q. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan metode purposive sampling dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 19 perusahaan. Pengujian hipotesis dengan regresi linear. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan corporate governance dan karakteristik perusahaan berpengaruh positif terhadap nilai perusahaan. Sedangkan pengungkapan corporate social responsibility (CSR) berpengaruh positif namun tidak signifikan. Jika seluruh variabel independen diuji secara bersamaan, ketiga variabel mempunyai pengaruh positif. Namun pengungkapan corporate social responsibility (CSR) tidak memiliki pengaruh yang siginifikan.Kata kunci: corporate governance, karakteristik perusahaan, corporate social responsibility (CSR), nilai perusahaan, sustainability report.


Author(s):  
N.K. Gupta ◽  
Shilki Bhatia

In India, corporate social responsibility and its disclosure got attention during the eighties and have been gaining importance with time in present economic environment, especially after adoption of liberalization, privatization, and globalization (LPG) (Goswami, 2011). Guidelines, principles, and codes are being developed by various regulatory bodies in India and across the globe to increase transparency and accountability about both a companys daily operations and the impact of these operations on society (Tran, 2014) In this paper, the author has studied the CSR guidelines laid down by Global Reporting Initiative G3.1 (GRI-G-3) and The National Voluntary Guidelines by Ministry of Corporate Affairs (NVG-MCA) and has compared them with a self-composed CSR Disclosure Index (CSRDI). The social responsibility initiatives taken by select Indian Automotive Companies have been analyzed and the companies have been rated as per the disclosures made by them. The main focus of the research is to compare the CSR Rankings of companies as per CSRDI with the companies rankings as per GRI-G-3 and NVG-MCA. It was observed that out of 30 sensex companies, Maruti Suzuki and TATA Motors have been the pioneers in contribution towards CSR initiatives. The top five rated companies were TATA Motors, Maruti Suzuki, Mahindra and Mahindra, Hero Motocorp, Bajaj Auto, and Apollo Tyres.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document