Experience of simulation practice using a high-fidelity patient simulator and standardized patients of nursing students

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 31-56
Author(s):  
Jiah Yun ◽  
In-Soon Kang ◽  
Min-Seo Son
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex McClimens ◽  
Robin Lewis ◽  
Jacqui Brewster

We report on the use of a high fidelity patient simulator (SimMan) within a clinical lab setting to teach learning disability nursing students about epilepsy management. We had previously prepped the students with verbal discussions on epilepsy management and, when the simulator began to undergo a seizure, small groups of students managed the unfolding scenario. We received written feedback from the students on the experience, and with reference to this and to the wider literature we consider the benefits of this approach to patient care. We surmise that lessons learned here will be applicable to trainee professionals from other parts of the register and in other fields allied to healthcare. We anticipate that this will improve care for people with intellectual disability in line with recommendations in Health Care for All (2008).


2015 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. S157-S163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin C. Savage ◽  
Catherine Tenn ◽  
Oshin Vartanian ◽  
Kristen Blackler ◽  
Wendy Sullivan-Kwantes ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Weller ◽  
M. Bloch ◽  
S. Young ◽  
M. Maze ◽  
S. Oyesola ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (spe) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Irene Ruiz Vera ◽  
Jussara Gue Martini

ABSTRACT Objective: to describe the satisfaction with the practical dimension of the high fidelity clinical simulation settings developed by the nursing students. Method: a quantitative, descriptive and correlational approach. Data collection, questionnaire to assess the nursing students' satisfaction with the simulated clinical experiences in the practice. Scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the maximum satisfaction value and 1, the minimum satisfaction value. A total of 115 students took part. The ethical requirements were met. Results: satisfaction with the achieved learning: fourth year, mean of 7.08; fifth year, mean of 7.05. Motivation to attend practical classes: fourth year, mean of 7.46; fifth year, mean of 7.16. Dynamism of the practical classes: fourth year, mean of 7.27; fifth year, mean of 6.66. Active participation in the developed settings: fourth year, mean of 7.41; fifth year, mean of 7.30. Interaction with their peers: fourth year, mean satisfaction greater than 8.14; fifth year, mean of 7.45. Interaction with the teachers: both classes showed a mean of 7.73. Satisfaction with the degree of difficulty of the settings: fourth year, mean of 7.25; fifth year, mean of 7.32. Productivity during the practical classes: fourth year, mean of 7.12; fifth year, mean of 6.95. Conclusion: fourth year showed greater satisfaction with the practice, over 70%; and fifth year, a satisfaction level of approximately 60% of the options.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 237796082093015
Author(s):  
Kelly V. Johnson ◽  
Allison L. Scott ◽  
Lisa Franks

Background Utilizing standardized patients (SPs) as a strategy to potentially improve beginning level nursing students’ confidence, satisfaction, and communication after simulated clinical cases is an innovative approach in nursing education. Aim The aim of this study was to examine to what extent an SP affected first semester nursing students’ self-confidence, satisfaction, and communication using a simulated clinical case. Methods First semester undergraduate students in a bachelors of nursing program at a large university in the South-Central region of the United States ( N =  100), were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Each group was assigned the same case using either an SP or high-fidelity manikin. Students completed postsurveys immediately following completion of the simulation. Student’s self-confidence, satisfaction, and communication were measured using the National League for Nursing Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning for Nursing Education Research and an SP/Faculty Communication Checklist. Results An independent sample t test comparing the two student groups on each of the outcome variables was conducted for each of the research questions. Students who completed the simulation with an SP, reported greater satisfaction, and improved communication. Student reflective comments were significantly more positive in the SP group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in self-confidence. Conclusion Further research is needed to determine whether the use of SPs versus high-fidelity manikins in simulated cases results in increased self-confidence in beginning level nursing students. Student satisfaction and communication are key components for nursing student success. The impact of SPs and the effect on student outcomes could have long-term benefits for undergraduate nursing programs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oshin Vartanian ◽  
Catherine Tenn ◽  
Wendy Sullivan-Kwantes ◽  
Kristen Blackler ◽  
Ingrid Smith ◽  
...  

Resuscitation ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Schebesta ◽  
Michael Hüpfl ◽  
Helmut Ringl ◽  
Anette-Marie Machata ◽  
Astrid Chiari ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 837-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Rodríguez-Caballero ◽  
I. Del Moral ◽  
J. C. Díaz de Terán ◽  
J. M. Rabanal ◽  
F. Ezquerra ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document