scholarly journals Application of a continuous Rainfall-Runoff model to the basin of Kosynthos river using the hydrological software HEC-HMS

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-203 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Conservation ◽  
Curve Number ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Army Corps ◽  
Soil Conservation Service ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Runoff Hydrograph ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model ◽  
Continuous Rainfall

<div> <h1 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size:11px;"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">In this paper, the application of a continuous rainfall-runoff model to the basin of Kosynthos River (district of Xanthi, Thrace, northeastern Greece), as well as the comparison of the computational runoff results with field discharge measurements are presented. The rainfall losses are estimated by the widely known Soil Conservation Service-Curve Number model, while the transformation of rainfall excess into direct runoff hydrograph is made by using the dimensionless unit hydrograph of Soil Conservation Service. The baseflow is computed by applying an exponential recession model. The routing of the total runoff hydrograph from the outlet of a sub-basin to the outlet of the whole basin is achieved by the Muskingum-Cunge model. The application of this complex hydrologic model was elaborated with the HEC-HMS 3.5 Hydrologic Modeling System of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The results of the comparison between computed and measured discharge values are very satisfactory.</span></span></h1> </div> <p>&nbsp;</p>

scholarly journals Sensitivity analysis of rainfall–runoff parameters models to estimate flows

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Yogi ◽  
Carina Julia Pensa Correa ◽  
Emerson Martins Arruda ◽  
Kelly Cristina Tonello
Keyword(s):  
Soil Conservation ◽  
Design Flow ◽  
Soil Conservation Service ◽  
Good Representation ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Time Of Concentration ◽  
Small Watersheds ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Concentration Methods ◽  
Runoff Model

AbstractDeterminate the runoff of a watershed is a challenge due to the complexity of representing all “inlets” and “outlets” involved in a rainfall–runoff model. Therefore, methodologies applied for this purpose should have a good representation of the variables that most influence in this process. One of the models used to calculate the design flow is the (USDA in Urban Hydrology for Small. Technical release, no 55 (TR-55). Soil Conservation Service. Washigton, DC, http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Urban+Hydrology+for+Small+watersheds#1, 1986), which considers the analysis changes in soil coverage, time of concentration (tc), and recurrence period (T). In this way, this study sought to evaluate the hydrological behavior of a watershed with an increase in soil waterproofing. These modifications were correlated with the variation of runoff coefficients (CN), modifications of the periods of recurrence indicated by the literature, and different equations of the time of concentration. Its application was carried out in the Ribeirão do Suru watershed, Santana de Parnaíba, SP, Brazil. The CN {75; 80; 85; 90} increased 3.14, 5.61, 10.90 and 15.85%, respectively. In the most critical situation, runoff was 15.85% higher in estimated CN. The variation of precipitation as a function of T (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 500) and application of 11 time of concentration methods designed 132 hydrographs and flow values that were statistically treated in T of Student and in the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Except for Bransby Willians associated Cinematic Method, Dooge with Johnstone and CTH with Tsuchyia, the pairs showed degrees of correlation below 59%. The greatest correlation was observed in Jonhstone with Dooge (90%), followed by the Kinematic Method with the Soil Conservation Service Method (83%) and with Dodge (74%). As a result, it was possible to demonstrate the behavior of the SCS parameters to minimize subjectivities and revealing how each parameter impacts the flow of the watershed. Finally, the sensitivity attributed to T was the highest among the three analyzed.

scholarly journals Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of GIS based continuous hydrological modelling

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry R. Manson
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Curve Number ◽  
Monte Carlo Analysis ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Lumped Model ◽  
Daily Average ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Runoff Model

The impact of uncertainty in spatial and a-spatial lumped model parameters for a continuous rainfall-runoff model is evaluated with respect to model prediction. The model uses a modified SCS-Curve Number approach that is loosely coupled with a geographic information system (GIS). The rainfall-runoff model uses daily average inputs and is calibrated using a daily average streamflow record for the study site. A Monte Carlo analysis is used to identify total model uncertainty while sensitivity analysis is applied using both a one-at-a-time (OAT) approach as well as through application of the extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Technique (FAST). Conclusions suggest that the model is highly followed by model inputs and finally the Curve Number. While the model does not indicate a high degree of sensitivity to the Curve Number at present conditions, uncertainties in Curve Number estimation can potentially be the cause of high predictive errors when future development scenarios are evaluated.

scholarly journals Estimation of synthetic flood design hydrographs using a distributed rainfall–runoff model coupled with a copula-based single storm rainfall generator

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1819-1833 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Candela ◽  
G. Brigandì ◽  
G. T. Aronica
Keyword(s):  
Curve Number ◽  
Geographical Information ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Unit Hydrograph ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Design Hydrographs ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Storm Rainfall ◽  
Elevation Model ◽  
Runoff Model

Abstract. In this paper a procedure to derive synthetic flood design hydrographs (SFDH) using a bivariate representation of rainfall forcing (rainfall duration and intensity) via copulas, which describes and models the correlation between two variables independently of the marginal laws involved, coupled with a distributed rainfall–runoff model, is presented. Rainfall–runoff modelling (R–R modelling) for estimating the hydrological response at the outlet of a catchment was performed by using a conceptual fully distributed procedure based on the Soil Conservation Service – Curve Number method as an excess rainfall model and on a distributed unit hydrograph with climatic dependencies for the flow routing. Travel time computation, based on the distributed unit hydrograph definition, was performed by implementing a procedure based on flow paths, determined from a digital elevation model (DEM) and roughness parameters obtained from distributed geographical information. In order to estimate the primary return period of the SFDH, which provides the probability of occurrence of a hydrograph flood, peaks and flow volumes obtained through R–R modelling were treated statistically using copulas. Finally, the shapes of hydrographs have been generated on the basis of historically significant flood events, via cluster analysis. An application of the procedure described above has been carried out and results presented for the case study of the Imera catchment in Sicily, Italy.

scholarly journals Integration and calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model in the framework of a decision support system for river basin management

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Götzinger ◽  
A. Bárdossy
Keyword(s):  
Groundwater Recharge ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Transfer Functions ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Base Flow ◽  
Flood Routing ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

Abstract. Water balance models provide significant input to integrated models that are used to simulate river basin processes. However, one of the primary problems involves the coupling and simultaneous calibration of rainfall-runoff and groundwater models. This problem manifests itself through circular arguments - the hydrologic model is modified to calculate highly discretized groundwater recharge rates as input to the groundwater model which provides modeled base flow for the flood-routing module of the rainfall-runoff model. A possibility to overcome this problem using a modified version of the HBV Model is presented in this paper. Regionalisation and optimization methods lead to objective and efficient calibration despite large numbers of parameters. The representation of model parameters by transfer functions of catchment characteristics enables consistent parameter estimation. By establishing such relationships, models are calibrated for the parameters of the transfer functions instead of the model parameters themselves. Simulated annealing, using weighted Nash-Sutcliffe-coefficients of variable temporal aggregation, assists in efficient parameterisations. The simulations are compared to observed discharge and groundwater recharge modeled by the State Institute for Environmental Protection Baden-Württemberg using the model TRAIN-GWN.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document