scholarly journals Canal Transportation, Centering Ability and Maintain Canal Curvature of Sendoline Versus Protaper Universal Rotary Nickel Titanium Files in Preparing Curved Root Canals: An In Vitro Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. 42-50
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Ali Salama ◽  
Shrief Adel El-Khodary ◽  
Wafaa Ahmed Omar Segari
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Nickel Titanium ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Canal Transportation ◽  
Curved Root Canals

scholarly journals Comparison of Canaltransportation and Centering Ability of Protaper Next, Hyflex Cmandwave One System Using Cone - Beam Computed Tomography-an in-Vitro Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 088-093
Author(s):  
Veerendra Uppin ◽  
Vinaya Varghese ◽  
Madhu Pujar ◽  
Nirmal Kurian ◽  
Hemant Vagarali
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Canal Transportation ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Curved Root Canals

Abstract Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the canal transportation and centering ability of Rotary ProTaper Next, Hyflex CM and Wave One primary systems using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in curved root canals. Materials and Methods: Total 30 freshly extracted maxillary first molars having root canals with curvature between 10°- 20° were divided into three groups of 10 teeth each. All teeth were scanned by CBCT to determine the root canal shape before instrumentation. In Group 1, the canals were prepared with ProTaper Next files, in Group 2 with Hyflex CM files and in Group 3 with Wave One files. After preparation, post-instrumentation scan was performed. Pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation images were obtained at 3 mm and 6 mm above the apical foramen and were compared using CBCT software. The amount of canal transportation and centering ability were assessed and statistically compared with one way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant test. (p<0.05). Results: All instrumentation systems used resulted in some amount of canal transportation. Data obtained suggested that Wave One files caused significantly lesser transportation and remained better centered in the canal than Hyflex CM and Rotary ProTaper Next files. Conclusion: The canal preparation with Wave One files results in lesser transportation and better centering ability than Hyflex CM and ProTaper Next rotary files in curved root canals.

scholarly journals Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Three Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (D) ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
Balaji Sopanrao Kapse ◽  
Pradnya S. Nagmode ◽  
Jayshree Ramkrishna Vishwas ◽  
Hrishikesh B. Karpe ◽  
Harshal V. Basatwar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
File System ◽  
File Systems ◽  
Nickel Titanium ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Apical Transportation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Canal Transportation ◽  
Curved Root Canals

AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare the canal transportation and centering ability of three rotary nickel-titanium file systems, HyFlex controlled memory, Revo-S, and Mtwo in moderately curved root canals using computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted single-rooted teeth having curved root canals with at least 10°–20° of curvature were selected. The teeth were divided into three experimental groups of ten each. After preparation with HyFlex CM (Coltene-Whaledent, Allstetten, Switzerland), Revo-S (Micro-Mega, Besançon, France), and Mtwo (VDW, Munich, Germany) all teeth were scanned using CT to determine the root canal shape. Pre- and post-instrumentation images were obtained at three levels, 3 mm apical, 9 mm middle, and 15 mm coronal above the apical foramen were compared using CT software. Amount of transportation and centering ability were assessed. The three groups were statistically compared with analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey’s honestly significant difference test. RESULTS: Least apical transportation and higher centering ability were seen in HyFlex CM file system in all the three sections followed by Revo-S, Mtwo file system showed maximum transportation. CONCLUSIONS: According to the present in-vitro study, we can conclude that HyFlex CM rotary file systems showed least canal transportation and highest centering ability as compared to Revo-S and Mtwo file system but there was no statistically significant difference among these file systems (p > 0.05) at coronal, middle, and apical level of root canal.

scholarly journals Shaping Ability of Superelastic and Controlled Memory Nickel-Titanium File Systems: An In Vitro Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Raidan A. Ba-Hattab ◽  
Dieter Pahncke
Keyword(s):  
Thermomechanical Processing ◽  
File Systems ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Nickel Titanium ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Niti Instruments ◽  
Niti Wires ◽  
Shaping Ability

Improvements in the thermomechanical processing procedures of NiTi wires have led to the development of new NiTi instruments that compose mainly of martensite crystals, making the wire stable at clinical condition. This study aimed at comparing the shaping ability of two rotary nickel-titanium systems manufactured from different NiTi wires. Twenty simulated root canals each with a curvature of 35° in resin blocks were divided into two groups of 10 canals each. Canals in the first group were prepared with superelastic F360 instruments (Gebr. Brasseler, Germany) while canals in the second group were prepared using controlled memory HyFlex®CM™ instruments (Coltène Whaledent, Switzerland). Images were taken before canal preparation and after the use of each instrument. The assessment of the canal shapes was accomplished with a computer image analysis program. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS program. Within the limitation of this in vitro study, HyFlex®CM™ instruments remained better centered in the apical third of the canals. In most canal segments, no significant differences were observed between either system in the amount of material removed. Both systems were comparable to each other in regards to their ability to enlarge root canal in the same way without procedural errors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document