scholarly journals Phase I trial of SAR103168, a novel multi-kinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory/relapsed acute leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 395-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail J. Roboz ◽  
H. Jean Khoury ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Wilena Session ◽  
Ellen K. Ritchie ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 198-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherif Farag ◽  
Lisa L Wood ◽  
Jennifer E. Schwartz ◽  
Shivani Srivastava ◽  
Robert P. Nelson ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 198 Fludarabine in combination high-dose busulfan (Bu) is an effective myeloablative preparative regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. At doses used, however, fludarabine has only modest anti-leukemic activity. Clofarabine (Clo) is a second-generation purine nucleoside antimetabolite with significant single agent activity in patients with AML and ALL. The novel combination of Clo with Bu may provide improved disease activity safely. Therefore, we conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Clo in combination with Bu in patients with high-risk acute leukemia. Patients received i.v. Bu (Busulfex) 0.8 mg/kg q 6 hrs on days −6 to −3 and Clo at 30–60 mg/m2/day on days −6 to −2 in successive cohorts. Stem cells were infused day 0. GvHD prophylaxis included sirolimus plus tacrolimus starting day −2 to day 100, tapering to day 180. Patients were eligible if they were 18–60 years, had primary refractory or relapsed and refractory AML or ALL, or were in CR2 or higher, had Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and adequate organ function. Donors were HLA-matched related (5/6 or 6/6 antigen-matched) or unrelated (10/10 allele-matched). Toxicity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events, version 3.0. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity that did not resolve to grade 2 or less by day 30. A total of 15 patients were treated at 4 Clo dose levels, 30 (n=3), 40 (n=3), 50 (n=3), and 60 mg/m2 (n=6). Seven males and 8 females of median age 48 (30–58) years, with AML (n=13) or ALL (n=2) were treated. At transplant, leukemia was relapsed and refractory (n=8), primary refractory (n=6), or in CR2 (n=1). Median number of lines of treatment failed before transplant was 2 (1–3). Median marrow blasts at transplant was 12% (3%–83%). Hematopoietic cell transplants were from related (n=9) and unrelated (n=6) donors. All patients engrafted. Median time to neutrophils >0.5×109/l was 16 (12–20) days, and to platelets >20×109/l was 15 (10–42) days. One patient treated at the 30 mg/m2 dose level failed to achieve platelets > 20×109/l. No DLT was observed. Transient Grades 3–4 non-hematological toxicities were evenly distributed across all 4 dose levels, and included vomiting (n=3), mucositis (n=9), hand-foot syndrome (n=1), and elevation of AST/ALT (n=10). Grades 3–4 elevation of AST/ALT occurred in 2 of 3 patients treated at 30 mg/m2, 3 of 3 at 40 mg/m2, 2 of 3 at 50 mg/m2, and 3 of 6 patients at 60 mg/m2 dose levels. AST/ALT peaked at day −1 or 0 and returned to baseline in all patients by day 10, with no long-term sequelae. There was no correlation between Clo dose and peak AST/ALT. One patient developed acute renal failure at the 60 mg/m2 dose on day +12 in association with elevated tacrolimus levels, although the creatinine subsequently normalized. Two patients, both at the 30 mg/m2 dose, developed mild veno-occlusive disease of the liver which was self-limiting. One treatment-related death due to sepsis was observed at day +104 in a patient treated at the 30 mg/m2 dose. Thirteen of 15 patients were in CR by day 30; 2 patients, treated at 40 mg/m2 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, failed to achieve CR. Day 100 mortality was 0. With a median follow-up of 313 days, the 1-year relapse-free survival was 51% ± 15%, and the 1-year overall survival was 61% ± 14%. Clo at doses as high as 60 mg/m2/day × 5 days in combination with Bu 3.2 mg/kg/day × 4 days is well tolerated and demonstrates promising efficacy in a very-high risk acute leukemia population. The MTD has not been reached. We recommend Phase II testing of Clo 60 mg/m2/day × 5 days in combination with high-dose Bu as a myeloablative regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute leukemia. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3588-3588
Author(s):  
Beata Holkova ◽  
Prithviraj Bose ◽  
Mary Beth Tombes ◽  
Ellen Shrader ◽  
Wen Wan ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3588 Although reports of synergistic interactions between proteasome and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors in acute leukemias have been limited, they are well described in B-cell malignancies (e.g., myeloma and lymphoma). Nevertheless, preclinical findings have shown striking synergism between the HDAC inhibitor belinostat (previously PXD-101) and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, administered at low (sub-micromolar) concentrations, in cultured and primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphocytic leukemia cells (Dai Y et al. Br J Haematol. 2011). These findings prompted initiation of a phase I trial, using a 3+3 design, with the primary objective of determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the combination of bortezomib and belinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis (CML-BC). To date, 25 patients with the following disease types have been treated: acute leukemia (n=19), MDS (n=4), and CML-BC (n=2). The male:female ratio was n=11 (44%):14 (56%); the median age was 62 (range 27–83) years; ECOG performance scores ranged from 0–2; and the median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–5). The schedule of administration was belinostat, 30 minutes intravenous (IV) infusion, on days 1–5 and 8–12; and bortezomib, IV bolus, preceding belinostat on days 1, 4, 8, 11; on a 21-day cycle. Dose levels were, in mg/m2(bortezomib/belinostat): 1.0/500 (n=6); 1.3/500 (n=6); 1.3/650 (n=4); 1.3/850 (n=3); 1.3/1000 (n=4); 1.3/1200 (n=2). The study is currently enrolling to dose level 6 (1.3/1200). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) have been observed to date. Non-DLT ≥ grade 2 (CTCAE version 4) treatment-related adverse events have included: fatigue (grade 2, 36%), leukopenia (grade 4, 12%), nausea (grade 2, 12%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (grade 2, 12%), and thrombocytopenia (grade 3, 20%). No serious adverse events have occurred at an unexpected frequency or severity. Two deaths have occurred due to disease progression, and one death has occurred due to a cerebrovascular accident that was related to pre-existing comorbidities and not to study-therapy. Of the 25 patients treated, 22 have been evaluable for response, 2 are too early to evaluate, and 1 patient was not evaluable for response. There have been 2 partial responses (PRs) and 1 complete response (CR) in this heavily pretreated population. The CR was achieved at dose level 1 in a patient with biphenotypic acute leukemia refractory to 7+3 and Flag-IDA. The patient proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) after 4 cycles of treatment. In addition, 1 patient with CML-BC had stable disease (SD) by protocol criteria but a CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) by standard criteria, and is undergoing evaluation for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. The patient is currently in cycle 8 at dose level 4. One of the PRs was achieved in a patient with AML transformed from MDS (2 prior regimens); after 4 cycles of treatment at dose level 5, the patient proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. The second PR was achieved in an AML patient after cycle 2; a bone marrow biopsy revealed chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and the response was deemed sufficient to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Also of note, a patient with AML transformed from MDS is currently on treatment in cycle 5 at dose level 5 with SD. An additional 6 patients have had SD, and 11 patients have had progressive disease. Correlative studies examining pre- and post-treatment leukemic blast expression of nuclear RelA, Bim, Bcl-xL, and XIAP are ongoing. Collectively, these findings indicate that a regimen combining belinostat and bortezomib is well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia, MDS, or CML-BC and shows evidence of activity. The MTD has not yet been reached. Pending identification of the MTD, phase II evaluation of this therapeutic strategy, should determine its activity more definitively. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christelle Chacar ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Tapan Kadia ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2598-2598
Author(s):  
Beata Holkova ◽  
Mary Beth Tombes ◽  
Ellen Shrader ◽  
Sheryl S. Cooke ◽  
Wen Wan ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2598 Numerous preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic interactions between proteasome and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, particularly in B-cell malignancies (e.g., myeloma and lymphoma). However, investigation of this strategy in acute leukemias has been limited. Very recent preclinical findings have shown marked synergism between the HDAC inhibitor belinostat and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib administered at very low (sub-micromolar) concentrations, in various cultured and primary acute myelogenous leukemia and acute lymphocytic leukemia specimens (Dai Y et al. Br J Haematol. 2011). These interactions were associated with multiple perturbations in survival signaling proteins, including inactivation of NF-kappa B, down-regulation of Bcl-xL and XIAP, and up-regulation of the pro-apoptotic protein Bim. These findings prompted initiation of a phase I trial with the primary objective of determining the recommended phase II doses (RPTDs) for the combination of bortezomib and belinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis (CML-BC). To date, 13 patients have been enrolled. Patients with the following disease types have been treated: acute leukemia (n=9), MDS (n=3), and CML-BC (n=1). Patient characteristics include male/female ratio n = 6 (46%)/7 (54%), with a median age of 59 years [range 27–75]. ECOG performance score 0–2. The median number of prior therapies was 2 [range 2–5]. The schedule of administration was belinostat 30 minutes intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1–5 and 8–12; and bortezomib IV bolus preceding belinostat on days 1, 4, 8, 11; on a 21 day cycle. Dose level enrollment was: Level 1 = bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2, belinostat 500 mg/m2 (n=6); Level 2 = bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, belinostat 500 mg/m2 (n=6); and Level 3 = bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, belinostat 650 mg/m2 (n=1). The study is currently enrolling to dose level 3. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) have been observed to date. Non-DLTs (CTCAE v4) include: leukopenia (grade 4, 23%), thrombocytopenia (grade 3, 15%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (grade 2, 23%). No serious adverse events have occurred at unexpected frequency or severity. Two deaths have occurred due to disease progression. Of the 13 patients treated, 12 have been evaluable for response. There has been 1 complete response in this heavily pretreated population. This response was achieved in a patient with biphenotypic acute leukemia, refractory to 7+3 and Flag-Ida. The patient proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Four patients had stable disease, and 7 patients had progressive disease. Correlative studies examining leukemic blast expression of nuclear RelA, Bim, Bcl-xL, and XIAP pre- and post-treatment are ongoing. Collectively, these findings indicate that a regimen combining belinostat and bortezomib is well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia, MDS, or CML-BC. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has not been reached. Pending identification of the RPTDs, phase II evaluation of this therapeutic strategy, if warranted, should define its activity more definitively. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1375-1382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian H. Kushner ◽  
Irene Y. Cheung ◽  
Shakeel Modak ◽  
Kim Kramer ◽  
Govind Ragupathi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 618-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Stein ◽  
Joycelynne Palmer ◽  
Ni-Chun Tsai ◽  
Monzr M. Al Malki ◽  
Ibrahim Aldoss ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (19) ◽  
pp. 5489-5498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angeles Alvarez Secord ◽  
Deanna K. Teoh ◽  
William T. Barry ◽  
Miao Yu ◽  
Gloria Broadwater ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document