Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: sites of extranodal involvement are a stronger prognostic indicator than number of extranodal sites in the rituximab era

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 2047-2055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chieh-Sheng Lu ◽  
Jia-Hong Chen ◽  
Tzu-Chuan Huang ◽  
Yi-Ying Wu ◽  
Ping-Ying Chang ◽  
...  
Hematology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 268-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cuiying Peng ◽  
Joshua Ho ◽  
Harrison X. Bai ◽  
Yuqian Huang ◽  
Raymond Y. Huang ◽  
...  

Hematology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Gomyo ◽  
Kazuyoshi Kajimoto ◽  
Yoshiharu Miyata ◽  
Akio Maeda ◽  
Ishikazu Mizuno ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (17) ◽  
pp. 4166-4172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Takahashi ◽  
Naoto Tomita ◽  
Masahiro Yokoyama ◽  
Saburo Tsunoda ◽  
Takahiro Yano ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5063-5063
Author(s):  
Sonja Genadieva-Stavrik ◽  
Alexandra Pivkova ◽  
Zlate Stojanoski ◽  
Borce Georgievski

Abstract Nowadays, goal of treatment approach in diffuse large B cell lymphoma is cure and first step towards it is to achieve complete remission. DLBCL is a potentially curable disease, with curability highly dependent on clinical and biological features. According to the WHO classification of Hematological Malignancies, the entity of DLBCL is characterized by rapidly growing mature B cell tumors with large or relatively large cells and /includes a number of disease variants/entities / encompassing several distinct clinopathologic diseases, several different histologic variants and clinical subtypes. There is no unique treatment for all patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Different subgroup of patients with DLBCL needs different treatment. In the pre-rutuximab era International Prognostic Index (IPI) was considered to be the most important prognostic factor for survival and the strongest indicator for identification of high-risk patients, who are unlikely to be cured with standard chemotherapy. Having in mind that IPI is based on 5 clinical characteristics (age, performance status, stage, extranodal involvement, LDH level) and it is constructed in the pre-rituximab is clear that R-IPI should be tested in rituximab era to provide any information of its validity. We retrospectively analyzed unselected population of 80 patients with confirmed diagnose of diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated at University hematology department in the period of 2005-2010. All patients were uniformly treated with R-CHOP regiment as initial treatment with curative intent. There were 80 patients with mean age 54, 5 years (15-84), male 35 and female 45. Older than 60 years were 29 patients (36, 25%). More than half of the patients (42) were diagnosed in advanced stage of the disease. We analyzed five prognostic factors: age, performance status, stage, extranodal involvement, LDH level and through the multifactorial analyses we selected two groups of patients. One with 0 to 2 factors as patients with low risk. Patients with more than 3 factors are considered as high risk. There is statistically significant difference in overall survival between two groups with five –years overall survival 70% for low risk patients and 47% for high risk. High-risk patients may be candidates for autologous transplantation as initial treatment, having in mind that in the rituximab era relapses occur very early in the first year and are difficult to be treated. R-IPI score is significant predictor and should be used for risk stratification of patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma. However, these findings should be validated prospectively in an independent population of patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. 2907-2909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Akasaka ◽  
Chiyoko Ueda ◽  
Masayuki Kurata ◽  
Hiroshi Akasaka ◽  
Hirohiko Yamabe ◽  
...  

Chromosomal translocation involving the BCL6 gene affects not only immunoglobulin (Ig) genes but also a number of non-Ig genes as partners. The molecular anatomy of the BCL6 gene rearrangements in 39 cases with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by long-distance polymerase chain reaction–based assays was determined. The results showed that Iggenes were affected in 21 cases; non-Ig genes, 15 cases; a deletion of more than a 1-kb segment, 2 cases; and a point mutation, 1 case. Comparative studies between the 21 cases withIg gene partners and the 17 cases with non-Iggene partners, including 2 cases with the deletion, showed that the overall survival of the latter group of patients was significantly inferior to that of the former (P = .0440), and the estimated 2-year overall survival rates were 58.3% vs 17.6% (P = .005). Non-Ig/BCL6 fusion is a poor prognostic indicator of DLBCL, and DLBCL with BCL6translocation could be subclassified according to the individual partner locus and/or gene.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8562-8562
Author(s):  
J. Larouche ◽  
F. Berger ◽  
C. Chassagne-Clement ◽  
C. Sebban ◽  
H. Ghesquieres ◽  
...  

8562 Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) usually relapses early following treatment but some relapses happen 5 years or later. Few data exist regarding clinical characteristics and outcome of these patients (pts). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all pts from two centers in Lyon/France between 1980–2003 who presented a biopsy proven relapse 5 years or later following diagnosis of DLBCL. All available biopsies were revised and immunohistochemistry (IHC) completed. Results: Among 1492 pts with DLBCL, 54 were eligible. Clinical characteristics at diagnosis were: median age 57 y; stage I-II 63% (34/54); IPI low/low intermediate 84% (41/49) and extranodal involvement (EN) 66% (35/53). IHC at diagnosis: CD20 100% (46/46), CD10 28% (10/36), bcl-6 53% (9/17), MUM1 48% (11/23), bcl-2 68% (19/28), germinal-center phenotype (GC) 57% (12/21) and non-GC 43% (9/21). 47/53 received CHOP/ACVBP-like regimens, 1 autologous transplantation (ASCT) and 1 rituximab. Median time from diagnosis to relapse was 7.4 years (5–20.5 years). 44 pts (81%) had DLBCL histology at time of relapse and 10 pts (19%) indolent histology. MUM1 expression at diagnosis was associated with DLBCL histology at relapse (p=0.037). Clinical characteristics at relapse were: median age 66 y; stage I-II 48% (26/54); 73% (31/43) with DLBCL at relapse had EN. 54% (15/28) with DLBCL at relapse had a GC phenotype and 46% (13/28) a non-GC phenotype. Treatment at relapse included rituximab in 21/54 and ASCT in 15/54 with 7 pts receiving both. Estimated 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) after relapse were 25% and 35% for all pts. Pts with DLBCL histology at relapse had an estimated 5-year EFS and OS of 18% and 28%. Pts with indolent histology had an estimated 5-year EFS and OS of 55% and 67%. Conclusions: Patients with DLBCL who present a late relapse usually had localized stage, favorable IPI and extranodal involvement at diagnosis. However, even if initial characteristics at time of first treatment were favorable, outcome of pts with DLBCL at time of relapse remains poor and aggressive treatment, such as ASCT, should be pursue whenever possible. Some patients relapsed with indolent histology and have a better outcome. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2015 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 662-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sosei Okina ◽  
Nobuyuki Yanagisawa ◽  
Maki Yokoyama ◽  
Yasutaka Sakurai ◽  
Yoshiko Numata ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document