Effect of Different Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation Modalities on Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilay Sahin ◽  
Ilknur Albayrak ◽  
Hatice Ugurlu
2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monavar Hadizadeh ◽  
Abbas Rahimi ◽  
Mohammad Javaherian ◽  
Meysam Velayati ◽  
Jan Dommerholt

Abstract Introduction Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most common disorders causing chronic muscle pain. Almost one-third of patients with musculoskeletal complaints meet the MPS criteria. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of intramuscular electrical stimulation (IMES) in patients with MPS through a systematic review method. Methods PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ProQuest, PEDro, Web of Science, and CINAHL were systematically searched to find out the eligible articles without language limitations from 1990 to December 30, 2020. All relevant randomized controlled trials that compared the effectiveness of IMES with sham-IMES, dry needling, or exercise therapy in patients with MPS were included. Full texts of the selected studies were critically appraised using Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2). Results Six studies (out of 397) had met our inclusion criteria (involving 158 patients) and were entered to the systematic review. Outcome measures examined in these studies included pain, range of motion, pressure pain threshold, biochemical factors, disability, and amount of analgesic use. In the most studies, it has been shown that IMES is more effective than the control group in improving some outcome measurements such as pain. Conclusion There is preliminary evidence from a few small trials suggesting the efficacy of IMES for the care of myofascial pain syndrome. The data support the conduct of larger trials investigating the efficacy of IMES.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athmaja Thottungal ◽  
Pranab Kumar ◽  
Arun Bhaskar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document