scholarly journals Towards Metaphors for Cascading AI

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Oppenlaender ◽  
Jesse Josua Benjamin

In the future, more and more systems will be powered by AI. This may exacerbate existing blind spots in explainability research, such as focusing on outputs of an individual AI pipeline as opposed to a holistic and integrative view on the system dynamics of data, algorithms, stakeholders, context and their respective interactions. AI systems will increasingly rely on patterns and models of other AI systems. This will likely introduce a major shift in the desiderata of interpretability, explainability and transparency. In this world of Cascading AI (CAI), AI systems will use the output of other AI systems as their inputs. The typical formulations of desiderata for explaining AI decision-making, such as post-hoc interpretability or model-agnostic explanations, may simply not hold in a world of cascading AI.In this paper, we propose two metaphors which may help designers to frame their efforts when designing Cascading AI systems.

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
James B. Rieley ◽  
Andrew Crossley
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Isabel Cepeda ◽  
Pedro Fraile Balbín

ABSTRACT This paper explores Alexis de Tocqueville's thought on fiscal political economy as a forerunner of the modern school of preference falsification and rational irrationality in economic decision making. A good part of the literature has misrepresented Tocqueville as an unconditional optimist regarding the future of fiscal moderation under democracy. Yet, although he initially shared the cautious optimism of most classical economists with respect to taxes under extended suffrage, Tocqueville's view turned more pessimistic in the second volume of his Democracy in America. Universal enfranchisement and democratic governments would lead to higher taxes, more intense income redistribution and government control. Under democracy, the continuous search for unconditional equality would eventually jeopardise liberty and economic growth.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
Beatrice Heim ◽  
Philipp Ellmerer ◽  
Ambra Stefani ◽  
Anna Heidbreder ◽  
Elisabeth Brandauer ◽  
...  

Background: Augmentation (AUG) in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) can be associated with impulse control disorder (ICD) symptoms, such as compulsive sexual behavior, gambling disorder or compulsive shopping. In this study, we wanted to assess whether RLS patients with AUG differ in decision making from those patients who have augmentation and in addition ICD symptoms (AUG + ICD) in a post hoc analysis of a patient cohort assessed in a previous study. Methods: In total, 40 RLS patients with augmentation (19 AUG + ICD, 21 AUG without ICDs) were included. RLS diagnosis, severity, and diagnosis of augmentation were made by sleep disorder specialists. ICD symptoms were assessed using semi-structured interviews. All patients performed the beads task, which is an information sampling task where participants must decide from which of the two cups colored beads were drawn. Results were compared to 21 healthy controls (HC). Results: There was no difference in information sampling or irrational decision making between AUG and AUG + ICD patients (p = 0.67 and p = 1.00, respectively). Both patient groups drew less beads and made more irrational decisions than HC (all p-values < 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: Our results suggest that augmentation itself is associated with poorer decision making even in the absence of ICD symptoms. Further studies are necessary to explore whether rapid and hasty decision making are a harbinger of augmentation in RLS.


1978 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 485-485
Author(s):  
John G. Kreifeldt

The present national Air Traffic Control system is a ground-centralized, man intensive system which through design allows relatively little meaningful pilot participation in decision making. The negative impact of this existing design can be measured in delays, dollars and lives. The FAA's design plans for the future ATC system will result in an even more intensive ground-centralized system with even further reduction of pilot decision making participation. In addition, controllers will also be removed from on-line decision making through anticipated automation of some or all of this critical function. Recent congressional hearings indicate that neither pilots nor controllers are happy or sanguine regarding the FAA's design for the future ATC system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document