scholarly journals Evaluation of the Public Health England and Sport England Funded Sport and Exercise Medicine Pilot in Secondary Care

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Copeland ◽  
Anna Myers ◽  
Helen Quirk ◽  
Helen Crank ◽  
David Broom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Exercise Medicine ◽  
Independent Evaluation ◽  
Sport And Exercise ◽  
The Uk

In 2014 Public Health England (PHE) launched the national physical activity (PA) framework ‘Everybody Active, Everyday’. The framework included a key domain for action called ‘Moving Professionals’. The Moving Professionals Programme aimed to build expertise and leadership across key professional sectors and to raise awareness and understanding of the health benefits of PA among professionals and the wider public. The Moving Professionals Programme comprised a number of innovative work packages that are described elsewhere (See Brannan et al., 2019). The Sport and Exercise Medicine (SEM) pilot was one element of the Moving Professionals Programme, and aimed to embed an SEM consultant led PA service within an NHS Trust to integrate PA in to the care plans of patients. This was termed creating an 'Active Hospital'.PHE and Sport England invited expressions of interest (EoIs) from NHS Trusts with the capacity to deliver the SEM pilot through a competitive process. Three Trusts were invited to interview and Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (OUHFT) were selected to deliver the pilot. The successful Trust was tasked with developing an SEM pilot that strengthened existing core resources and expanded existing capacity to integrate specialist PA advice into the care pathways for adults in-patient care. This was tested across five clinical pathways within OUHFT where PA had not previously been targeted as a treatment intervention.Two lead SEM consultants were responsible for developing and implementing the SEM pilot, which targeted five clinical pathways and was underpinned by the COM-B model. These were; Maternity, Enablement, Renal, Complex Medical Unit (originally Critical Care), and Cardiology.As part of the National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine (NCSEM) network, academics at Sheffield Hallam University (SHU) were commissioned to conduct an independent evaluation of the SEM pilot. The NCSEM were not responsible for the implementation or delivery of the SEM pilot. The evaluation aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of the SEM pilot and followed a mixed methods approach. Data was collected from patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) using surveys, face-to-face and telephone interviews and audits between June 2018 and March 2019. This report details the evaluation findings and provides implications for ongoing implementation of the pilot in OUHFT and for sharing learning with other Trusts across the UK.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Public Health England and Sport England Funded Physical Activity Clinical Advice Pad Pilot in Primary Care

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Copeland ◽  
Anna Myers ◽  
Helen Quirk ◽  
Helen Crank ◽  
David Broom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Physical Activity ◽  
The Public ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
Exercise Medicine ◽  
Independent Evaluation ◽  
Innovative Work ◽  
Sport And Exercise ◽  
Brief Advice ◽  
Improve Health

In 2014 Public Health England (PHE) launched the national physical activity (PA) framework ‘Everybody Active, Everyday’. The framework included a key domain for action called ‘Moving Professionals’. The Moving Professionals Programme aimed to build expertise and leadership across key professional sectors and to raise awareness and understanding of the health benefits of PA among professionals and the wider public. The Moving Professionals Programme comprised a number of innovative work packages that are described elsewhere (See Brannan et al., 2019). The Physical Activity Clinical Advice Pad (PACAP) pilot was one element of the Moving Professionals Programme, and aimed to; increase the number of primary healthcare professionals (HCPs) in England who integrate brief advice on PA into their routine clinical practice.The PACAP provides advice about the amount and type of PA required to improve health and was designed to look like a prescription pad to aid compliance with the advice provided. It also provides tips on different ways to become more active and signposts users to the PHE Active 10 app and One You website. The purpose of the PACAP was to prompt and facilitate conversations about PA between HCPs and patients.In 2017, PHE and Sport England invited expressions of interest (EoIs) from Local Authority (LA) and Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) partnerships across England to engage in the pilot. Twenty-five applications were returned and ten partnerships were invited to take part in the PACAP pilot.As part of the National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine (NCSEM) network, academics at Sheffield Hallam University (SHU) were commissioned to conduct an independent evaluation of the PACAP pilot. The NCSEM were not responsible for the implementation or delivery of the PACAP pilot. The evaluation adopted a mixed methods approach to explore the acceptability of the PACAP pilot. Data was collected from patients and HCPs using surveys, telephone interviews, focus groups and audits between April 2018 and February 2019. This report details the evaluation findings, provides recommendation for future iterations of the project and provides implications for scaling the PACAP across additional localities in England.

scholarly journals The National ReferAll Database: An Open Dataset of Exercise Referral Schemes Across the UK

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 4831
Author(s):  
James Steele ◽  
Matthew Wade ◽  
Robert J. Copeland ◽  
Stuart Stokes ◽  
Rachel Stokes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Research Community ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Local Data ◽  
Exercise Medicine ◽  
Sport And Exercise ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Exercise Referral

In 2014, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) called for the development of a system to collate local data on exercise referral schemes (ERS). This database would be used to facilitate continued evaluation of ERS. The use of health databases can spur scientific investigation and the generation of evidence regarding healthcare practice. NICE’s recommendation has not yet been met by public health bodies. Through collaboration between ukactive, ReferAll, a specialist in software solutions for exercise referral, and the National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, which has its research hub at the Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, in Sheffield, data has been collated from multiple UK-based ERS to generate one of the largest databases of its kind. This database moves the research community towards meeting NICEs recommendation. This paper describes the formation and open sharing of The National ReferAll Database, data-cleaning processes, and its structure, including outcome measures. Collating data from 123 ERSs on 39,283 individuals, a database has been created containing both scheme and referral level characteristics in addition to outcome measures over time. The National ReferAll Database is openly available for researchers to interrogate. The National ReferAll Database represents a potentially valuable resource for the wider research community, as well as policy makers and practitioners in this area, which will facilitate a better understanding of ERS and other physical-activity-related social prescribing pathways to help inform public health policy and practice.

scholarly journals COVID-19 Pandemic: The Urgent Dental Hub experience from a primary care perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Zohaib Khwaja ◽  
Awais Ali ◽  
Manraj Rai
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Specialist Care ◽  
Health Message ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
General Dental Practitioner ◽  
Public Health Message ◽  
The Uk

In response to the nationwide lockdown on 23 March 2020 in the UK, urgent dental hubs (UDHs) were established in the community to provide emergency dental care. Consecutive referrals to a primary care UDH were prospectively analysed over a one-month period, from 18 May 2020 to 18 June 2020. Of 400 referrals received, the most common were in relation to pain (87%). In 63% neither a radiograph nor photograph was provided with the referral. Seventy percent of patients were telephone triaged within 24 hours of receipt of referral. Fifty-three percent of referrals were accepted for face-to-face treatment, of which 69% were treated by extraction. Of rejected referrals (n=179; 45%), 79% were due to symptoms having settled or being manageable by the time of triage. A small number of referrals were redirected for specialist care. Referrals that were accepted were more likely to have been prescribed antibiotics and less likely to have been referred by the general dental practitioner (GDP) they regularly saw (p <0.01). Patients that were older and those that identified themselves as not having a regular GDP were less likely to have been referred to an UDH. The quality of referrals was poor and there may be a role for virtual consultations moving forwards. We found pre-referral antimicrobial prescriptions were high and a confused public health message may have been sent.

scholarly journals TP10.2.9The effect of COVID-19 on Breast clinic follow ups – a change in future practice?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Norman ◽  
Lilia Ragad ◽  
Anupama Nagarajakumar ◽  
Maryam Alam Khan ◽  
Michal Uhercik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
University Hospital ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Breast Clinic ◽  
Telephone Consultation ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Video Telephone ◽  
Malignant Breast ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Future Practice

Abstract Aims Prior to March 2020, at Princess Royal University Hospital (PRUH), Kings College NHS Foundation Trust, almost daily face to face benign/malignant breast clinic follow ups occurred. On March 23rd 2020 the UK went into official COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. The effect on elective follow up practice was swift with cancellation, triaging and replacement of face-to-face by telephonic/virtual consultations. We compared the change of follow up pattern, pre and post COVID-19. Could this effect the future of consultations at PRUH? Methods A comparison of all patients attending PRUH breast unit outpatients in January 2020 (preCOVID-19) for follow up, with those attending in April 2020 (postCOVID-19). Data collection from clinic lists and electronic patient records, with Excel version 16 analysis. Results 343 patient follow up consultations 01/2020. 53 patient follow up consultations 04/2020. Malignant cases: January 65%, April 60% Benign/B3 cases: January 35%, April 20% Summary follow up types. Conclusions Impact of COVID has been widespread in our practice. Our results show a significant reduction in face-to-face appointments, to allow social distancing. Further evaluation of this model will show its sustainability. Patient satisfaction will have to be assessed, with a view to a full move to video/telephone consultation where indicated.

scholarly journals Public health nutrition workforce development in seven European countries: constraining and enabling factors

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1989-1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna Kugelberg ◽  
Svandis Jonsdottir ◽  
Elisabeth Faxelid ◽  
Kristina Jönsson ◽  
Ann Fox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Workforce Development ◽  
Organizational Structures ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Public Health Nutrition ◽  
Enabling Factors ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Agents Of Change ◽  
Training Programmes ◽  
The Uk

AbstractObjectivesLittle is known about current public health nutrition workforce development in Europe. The present study aimed to understand constraining and enabling factors to workforce development in seven European countries.DesignA qualitative study comprised of semi-structured face-to-face interviews was conducted and content analysis was used to analyse the transcribed interview data.SettingThe study was carried out in Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK.SubjectsSixty key informants participated in the study.ResultsThere are constraining and enabling factors for public health nutrition workforce development. The main constraining factors relate to the lack of a supportive policy environment, fragmented organizational structures and a workforce that is not cohesive enough to implement public health nutrition strategic initiatives. Enabling factors were identified as the presence of skilled and dedicated individuals who assume roles as leaders and change agents.ConclusionsThere is a need to strengthen coordination between policy and implementation of programmes which may operate across the national to local spectrum. Public health organizations are advised to further define aims and objectives relevant to public health nutrition. Leaders and agents of change will play important roles in fostering intersectorial partnerships, advocating for policy change, establishing professional competencies and developing education and training programmes.

scholarly journals EP.FRI.422 Over 100,000 COVID-19 deaths calls for a radical reform of health and care system in the UK

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shruti Bodapati ◽  
Raghvinder Gambhir
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Secondary Care ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Radical Reform ◽  
National Statistics ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Second Wave ◽  
Excess Deaths ◽  
Care System

Abstract Aim With over 100,000 deaths due to COVID 19 and still counting, is it a wake-up call to overhaul our health and care system. Methods Review of NHS England, Office of National Statistics (ONS) and Public Health England (PHE) data to determine where the deaths occurred and what role did the primary care, secondary care, play in delivering the service. Results The data shows that it took 40 weeks to get to the first 50,000 deaths and just another 10 weeks to add another 50,000 deaths. Among the OECD UK ranked number 1 for deaths due to COVID 19.  69.9%   of deaths occurred in hospitals, 24.1% in care homes, while 4.9% occurred at homes. The primary care effectively remained shut for face to face consultation, effectively leaving people to manage themselves at home on their own or reach A & E when things got worse. The hospitals where overwhelmed and coped by shutting out all elective work and converting normal wards to COVID wards and that is where the maximum deaths occurred. There were over 80000 excess deaths above the five-year average. Conclusion We may have been underprepared for the first wave but had the PPE and plans to battle the second wave yet we had the highest mortality in Europe. Is it a price we paid for our disjointed health and care system. There is a need for radical changes to prepare for future disasters.

scholarly journals Exploring innovation perceptions and practices among micro and small craft breweries

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abel Duarte Alonso ◽  
Alessandro Bressan ◽  
Nikolaos Sakellarios
Keyword(s):  
Small Firms ◽  
Innovation Adoption ◽  
Brewing Industry ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
Craft Beer ◽  
Data Collection Process ◽  
Small Craft ◽  
The Uk

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine how micro and small craft brewery operators perceive and operationalise innovation. Moreover, in adopting the theory of innovation, the study addresses two under-researched areas, namely, innovation among micro and small firms and innovation in the context of the emerging craft brewing industry. Design/methodology/approach The perspectives of 163 craft brewery operators located in Italy, Spain, and the UK were gathered through online questionnaires. In total, 24 face-to-face and telephone interviews with operators from the three nations complemented the data collection process. Thus, in total, 187 operators participated. Findings Development of new craft beer styles, new recipes, exploring with various ingredients, improving quality, or involvement in social media and culinary tourism were predominant forms participants perceived innovation. Various differences regarding innovation adoption were noticed, particularly based on participants’ country and on their role at the brewery. Furthermore, associations between the findings and the dimensions of the theory of innovation were confirmed. Originality/value This study is original, in that it represents a first effort in comparing perceptions of craft brewery operators across various countries. This comparison identifies ways in which craft brewery operators could maximise the potential of their firms. For example, the manifested interest in innovating through new craft beer recipes, or blending gastronomy and craft beer underlines alternative forms of adding value to craft brewing production. Importantly, some of these innovating practices differ based on participants’ country; such differences could also be considered by craft brewery operators.

scholarly journals A Delphi developed syllabus for the medical specialty of sport and exercise medicine

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 490-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Humphries ◽  
Rod Jaques ◽  
Hendrik Paulus Dijkstra
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Potential Barrier ◽  
Medical Specialty ◽  
Specialist Training ◽  
Exercise Medicine ◽  
Sport And Exercise ◽  
The Uk

Training in the medical specialty of sport and exercise medicine is now available in many, but not all countries. Lack of resources may be a barrier to the development of this important specialty field and the International Syllabus in Sport and Exercise Medicine Group was convened to reduce one potential barrier, the need to develop a syllabus. The group is composed of 17 sport and exercise medicine specialists residing in 12 countries (Australia, Canada, India, Ireland, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Qatar, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and USA). This paper presents the first phase of this project covering the domains and general learning areas of a specialist training syllabus in sport and exercise medicine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document