scholarly journals Reduced Attention to Faces in Images is associated with Psychopathology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marius Rubo ◽  
Ivo Käthner ◽  
Simone Munsch

Humans show a robust tendency to attend to faces in images, but also differ consistently in the strength of this attentional preference. Previous research remained inconclusive as to how a stronger attentional preference for faces may be indicative of an individual's personality or clinical characteristics. Here we investigated attention towards faces in 120 participants who freely viewed photos showing a person in the context of a complex and visually rich environment. Participants differed consistently in the strength of their attention to faces across images with $\alpha$ = 0.88. A stronger preference for faces was correlated positively with openness to experience, extraversion, agreeableness and empathizing and was correlated negatively with social anxiety, depression levels and alexithymia. A common factor, which may be best understood as general psychopathology, explained 41% of the variance in these variables and was correlated with face preference at r = -0.36. Social anxiety stood out as only variable which explained face preference above and beyond the Big Five personality factors. Future research should investigate how correlates of face preference generalize across different types of images and real-life social situations.

SAGE Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 215824401881862 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Fagley

This study investigated the relation between appreciation and positive and negative affect, controlling for gender, age, ethnicity, and Big Five personality factors. Appreciation consists of several aspects, including a focus on what one has (“have” focus), awe, gratitude, and interpersonal appreciation. Undergraduates ( N = 236) completed an online survey containing the Appreciation Scale, Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), and Big Five Inventory (BFI). The Big Five traits accounted for 38% and 43% of the variance in positive and negative affect, respectively, beyond demographics. Appreciation accounted for 9% ( p < .001) and 4.6% ( p < .05) of the variance in positive and negative affect, respectively, beyond demographics and the Big Five. The “have” focus aspect of appreciation, which represents noticing, focusing on, and valuing what one has, accounted for significant unique variance in both positive and negative affect. Gratitude did not. Future research is needed to determine how broadly these results generalize.


2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
VIREN SWAMI ◽  
ULRICH S. TRAN ◽  
LOUISE HOFFMANN BROOKS ◽  
LAURA KANAAN ◽  
ELLEN-MARLENE LUESSE ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-169
Author(s):  
Sara Jahnke ◽  
Sabine Schmitt ◽  
Max Geradt ◽  
Jürgen Hoyer

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Laurie Rose ◽  
Laura Bennett Murphy ◽  
Lynn Byard ◽  
Katherina Nikzad

Using the five‐factor personality model, the present study explored the influence of personality factors on sustained attention and perceived workload. Ninety‐six college‐aged participants were administered a 12 minute vigilance fast event rate task. Following the vigil, participants were asked to first, rate their perceived workload of the task using the NASA‐TLX, and then second, complete the NEO‐PI‐R personality inventory. Traditional measures of hits, false alarms, and reaction times were examined as well as the signal detection indices of perceptual sensitivity and response bias. Extraversion correlated with false alarms (r = 0.181; eta2 = 0.055) and conscientiousness correlated with both false alarms (r = −0.275, eta2 = 0.097) and perceptual sensitivity (r = 0.227, eta2 = 0.052). With regard to perceived workload, neuroticism was related to perceived frustration (r = 0.238, eta2 = 0.057). The findings are discussed in terms of theoretical implications, impact of task parameters, and practical applications. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


2011 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 1124-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris A. M. Smits ◽  
Conor V. Dolan ◽  
Harrie C. M. Vorst ◽  
Jelte M. Wicherts ◽  
Marieke E. Timmerman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document