Evaluations of anxious others: Using cluster analyses to explore the co-existence of positive and negative evaluations and social anxiety
Introduction: Research on individuals with social anxiety has primarily focused on their evaluations of themselves before, during, and after social situations. However, our most evidence-based treatment remains not effective for some. Considering social and clinical theory, we wonder if some people with social anxiety experience negative evaluations of others. Prior studies tested for group-based differences, which does not allow for the possibility that only a subset of people with social anxiety evaluate others negatively. Across two studies, we use cluster analyses to determine how social anxiety and negative other-evaluations co-vary. Methods: 267 (study 1) and 290 (study 2) unselected participants completed an online survey, including two measures modified for the current study: Modified-Interpretation and Judgemental Questionnaire (M-IJQ) and Modified Ways of Thinking about Social Behaviour Questionnaire (M-WTSBQ). Participants read several vignettes and judged the hypothetical anxious person across several positive and negative attributes (M-IJQ). Results: Results from the cluster analysis revealed consistent groups of individuals across both studies, including people with: 1) severe social anxiety and no judgements; 2) low social anxiety and no judgements; 3) mild-to-moderate social anxiety and positive judgements; and 4) some social anxiety who disagreed with all judgements. We discuss how these clusters relate to thoughts about themselves and others on the M-WTSBQ. Discussion: Previous research has been mixed on the presence of negative evaluations of others in social anxiety. This study clarifies some of the confusion by revealing subgroups of individuals with varying social anxiety and judgements of others.