scholarly journals How do people plan to negotiate?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dai Le ◽  
Daisung Jang

Planning is critical for negotiation success as it facilitates obtaining superior outcomes. However, little empirically is known about what people do to plan. We offer an initial exploration of the topic, with the aim of inspiring greater research attention to the topic. We approach the question from an individual differences perspective, since planning phase places greater emphasis on individual action. We explored how the Big Five personality factors and gender predict preference and search for information that facilitates efforts to claim value, create value, and manage relationships. In Study 1, we used a survey method to elicit preferences. Extraversion and conscientiousness predicted preference for information that would help to claim value, and agreeableness predicted preference for information that would help to manage relationships. Women preferred value creating information. In Studies 2, 3, and 4, we examined search behavior using the Mouselab paradigm (Johnson, Payne, Bettman, & Schkade, 1989). A different pattern of relationships emerged. When the search task was complex, agreeableness predicted how extensively people searched for information. When tasks were more constrained, we detected fewer relationships between individual differences and search behavior.

2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
VIREN SWAMI ◽  
ULRICH S. TRAN ◽  
LOUISE HOFFMANN BROOKS ◽  
LAURA KANAAN ◽  
ELLEN-MARLENE LUESSE ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-169
Author(s):  
Sara Jahnke ◽  
Sabine Schmitt ◽  
Max Geradt ◽  
Jürgen Hoyer

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Laurie Rose ◽  
Laura Bennett Murphy ◽  
Lynn Byard ◽  
Katherina Nikzad

Using the five‐factor personality model, the present study explored the influence of personality factors on sustained attention and perceived workload. Ninety‐six college‐aged participants were administered a 12 minute vigilance fast event rate task. Following the vigil, participants were asked to first, rate their perceived workload of the task using the NASA‐TLX, and then second, complete the NEO‐PI‐R personality inventory. Traditional measures of hits, false alarms, and reaction times were examined as well as the signal detection indices of perceptual sensitivity and response bias. Extraversion correlated with false alarms (r = 0.181; eta2 = 0.055) and conscientiousness correlated with both false alarms (r = −0.275, eta2 = 0.097) and perceptual sensitivity (r = 0.227, eta2 = 0.052). With regard to perceived workload, neuroticism was related to perceived frustration (r = 0.238, eta2 = 0.057). The findings are discussed in terms of theoretical implications, impact of task parameters, and practical applications. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


2011 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 1124-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris A. M. Smits ◽  
Conor V. Dolan ◽  
Harrie C. M. Vorst ◽  
Jelte M. Wicherts ◽  
Marieke E. Timmerman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document