Eye movements modulate interoceptive processing during rapid eye movement sleep: the heartbeat evoked potential in phasic and tonic REM microstates

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Péter Simor ◽  
Bogdány Tamás ◽  
Robert Bodizs ◽  
Pandelis Perakakis

Sleep is a fundamental physiological state that facilitates neural recovery during periods of attenuated sensory processing. On the other hand, mammalian sleep is also characterized by the interplay between periods of increased sleep depth and environmental alertness. Whereas the heterogeneity of microstates during non-rapid-eye-movement (NREM) sleep was extensively studied in the last decades, transient microstates during REM sleep received less attention. REM sleep features two distinct microstates: phasic and tonic. Previous studies indicate that sensory processing is largely diminished during phasic REM periods, whereas environmental alertness is partially reinstated when the brain switches into tonic REM sleep. Here, we investigated interoceptive processing as quantified by the heartbeat evoked potential (HEP) during REM microstates. We contrasted the HEPs of phasic and tonic REM periods using two separate databases that included the nighttime polysomnographic recordings of healthy young individuals (N = 20 and N = 19). We find a differential HEP modulation of a late HEP component (after 500 ms post-R-peak) between tonic and phasic REM. Moreover, the late tonic HEP component resembled the HEP found in resting wakefulness. Our results indicate that interoception with respect to cardiac signals is not uniform across REM microstates, and suggest that interoceptive processing is partially reinstated during tonic REM periods. The analyses of the HEP during REM sleep may shed new light on the organization and putative function of REM microstates.

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Péter Simor ◽  
Tamás Bogdány ◽  
Róbert Bódizs ◽  
Pandelis Perakakis

Abstract Sleep is a fundamental physiological state that facilitates neural recovery during periods of attenuated sensory processing. On the other hand, mammalian sleep is also characterized by the interplay between periods of increased sleep depth and environmental alertness. Whereas the heterogeneity of microstates during non-rapid-eye-movement (NREM) sleep was extensively studied in the last decades, transient microstates during REM sleep received less attention. REM sleep features two distinct microstates: phasic and tonic. Previous studies indicate that sensory processing is largely diminished during phasic REM periods, whereas environmental alertness is partially reinstated when the brain switches into tonic REM sleep. Here, we investigated interoceptive processing as quantified by the heartbeat evoked potential (HEP) during REM microstates. We contrasted the HEPs of phasic and tonic REM periods using two separate databases that included the nighttime polysomnographic recordings of healthy young individuals (N = 20 and N = 19). We find a differential HEP modulation of a late HEP component (after 500 ms post-R-peak) between tonic and phasic REM. Moreover, the late tonic HEP component resembled the HEP found in resting wakefulness. Our results indicate that interoception with respect to cardiac signals is not uniform across REM microstates, and suggest that interoceptive processing is partially reinstated during tonic REM periods. The analyses of the HEP during REM sleep may shed new light on the organization and putative function of REM microstates.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 794-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Acquistapace ◽  
Anna P. Candeloro ◽  
Vladimir Georgiev ◽  
Maria L. Manca

Aim of the present study is to compare the synchronization of the classical Kuramoto system and the reaction - diffusion space time Landau - Ginzburg model, in order to describe the alternation of REM (rapid eye movement) and NREM (non-rapid eye movement) sleep across the night. These types of sleep are considered as produced by the cyclic oscillation of two neuronal populations that, alternatively, promote and inhibit the REM sleep. Even if experimental data will be necessary, a possible interpretation of the results has been proposed.


Author(s):  
Douglas J. Gelb

Sleep consists of a highly patterned sequence of cyclic activity in various regions of the brain; it is not simply a state of temporary unconsciousness. Although the brain is less responsive than normal during sleep, it is not totally unresponsive. In fact, during sleep the brain responds more readily to meaningful stimuli. Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep can be characterized as a period when the brain is active and the body is paralyzed, whereas in nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, the brain is less active but the body can move. Sleep disorders are grouped into three general categories, based on whether patients have trouble staying awake, trouble sleeping, or abnormal behaviors during sleep.


2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 906-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Muraki ◽  
S Kitaguchi ◽  
H Ichihashi ◽  
R Haraguchi ◽  
T Iwanaga ◽  
...  

This study investigated the differences in apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (AHI-REM) and AHI during non-REM (NREM) sleep (AHI-NREM) in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Nocturnal polysomnography was performed in 102 Japanese OSA patients and their AHI along with a variety of other factors were retrospectively evaluated. Regardless of the severity of AHI, mean apnoea duration was longer and patients' lowest recorded oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry was lower during REM sleep than during NREM sleep. Approximately half of the patients ( n = 50) had a higher AHI-NREM than AHI-REM. In subjects with AHI ≤ 60 events/h, AHI-NREM was significantly higher than AHI-REM. On multivariate logistic regression, severe AHI ≤ 30 events/h was the only predictor of a higher AHI-NREM than AHI-REM. This may indicate that important, but unknown, factors related to the mechanism responsible for the severity of OSA are operative during NREM sleep.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janna D. Lendner ◽  
Randolph F. Helfrich ◽  
Bryce A. Mander ◽  
Luis Romundstad ◽  
Jack J. Lin ◽  
...  

AbstractDeep non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREM) – also called slow wave sleep (SWS) – and general anesthesia are prominent states of reduced arousal linked to the occurrence of slow oscillations in the electroencephalogram (EEG). Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, however, is also associated with a diminished arousal level, but is characterized by a desynchronized, ‘wake-like’ EEG. This observation challenges the notion of oscillations as the main physiological mediator of reduced arousal. Using intracranial and surface EEG recordings in four independent data sets, we establish the 1/f spectral slope as an electrophysiological marker that accurately delineates wakefulness from anesthesia, SWS and REM sleep. The spectral slope reflects the non-oscillatory, scale-free measure of neural activity and has been proposed to index the local balance between excitation and inhibition. Taken together, these findings reconcile the long-standing paradox of reduced arousal in both REM and NREM sleep and provide a common unifying physiological principle — a shift in local Excitation/ Inhibition balance — to explain states of reduced arousal such as sleep and anesthesia in humans.Significance StatementThe clinical assessment of arousal levels in humans depends on subjective measures such as responsiveness to verbal commands. While non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and general anesthesia share some electrophysiological markers, rapid eye movement sleep (REM) is characterized by a ‘wake-like’ electroencephalogram. Here, we demonstrate that non-oscillatory, scale-free electrical brain activity — recorded from both scalp electroencephalogram and intracranial recordings in humans — reliably tracks arousal levels during both NREM and REM sleep as well as under general anesthesia with propofol. Our findings suggest that non-oscillatory brain activity can be used effectively to monitor vigilance states.


eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srikanta Chowdhury ◽  
Takanori Matsubara ◽  
Toh Miyazaki ◽  
Daisuke Ono ◽  
Noriaki Fukatsu ◽  
...  

Sleep/wakefulness cycle is regulated by coordinated interactions between sleep- and wakefulness-regulating neural circuitry. However, the detailed mechanism is far from understood. Here, we found that glutamic acid decarboxylase 67-positive GABAergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTAGad67+) are a key regulator of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep in mice. VTAGad67+ project to multiple brain areas implicated in sleep/wakefulness regulation such as the lateral hypothalamus (LH). Chemogenetic activation of VTAGad67+ promoted NREM sleep with higher delta power whereas optogenetic inhibition of these induced prompt arousal from NREM sleep, even under highly somnolescent conditions, but not from REM sleep. VTAGad67+ showed the highest activity in NREM sleep and the lowest activity in REM sleep. Moreover, VTAGad67+ directly innervated and inhibited wake-promoting orexin/hypocretin neurons by releasing GABA. As such, optogenetic activation of VTAGad67+ terminals in the LH promoted NREM sleep. Taken together, we revealed that VTAGad67+ play an important role in the regulation of NREM sleep.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Sue Llewellyn

Dreaming happens during sleep. When we aren’t interacting with the world, our minds turn inwards. We dream. These dreams differ. Rapid eye movement (REM) dreams are visual, vivid, bizarre, emotional, and highly associative with embodied narratives, whereas non-rapid eye movement (NREM) dreams tend to be shorter and more thought-like. During REM dreams, the brain is as active, or even more active, than it is during wakefulness. In some dreams, during REM sleep, the dreamer is lucid—they become aware they are dreaming and can, sometimes control the dream content. These different types of dream happen at different times in the sleep cycle. Across the night, we experience NREM sleep (including light sleep and deep sleep) and REM sleep in a fixed sequence. The night isn’t a uniform period of rest. This introductory chapter explains these basic issues about sleep and dreams.


1995 ◽  
Vol 269 (5) ◽  
pp. R1250-R1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. N. Alam ◽  
D. McGinty ◽  
R. Szymusiak

The thermosensitivity of 15 warm-sensitive neurons (WSNs) and 19 cold-sensitive neurons (CSNs) from the medial preoptic/anterior hypothalamus (POAH) was tested during wakefulness, non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep by local POAH warming and cooling in freely moving cats. Thermosensitivity was quantified by three criteria, Q10, impulses per second per degree Celsius, and percent change per degree Celsius. Irrespective of the criterion used, WSNs did not exhibit a significant change in thermosensitivity during REM sleep compared with wakefulness and NREM sleep. In contrast, CSNs exhibited decreased mean thermosensitivity during REM sleep compared with wakefulness. CSNs as a group did not retain significant thermosensitivity in REM sleep. These findings are consistent with evidence that thermoeffector responses to cooling are lost in REM sleep, whereas some responses to warming are preserved.


2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 1087-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ritchie E. Brown ◽  
Radhika Basheer ◽  
James T. McKenna ◽  
Robert E. Strecker ◽  
Robert W. McCarley

This review summarizes the brain mechanisms controlling sleep and wakefulness. Wakefulness promoting systems cause low-voltage, fast activity in the electroencephalogram (EEG). Multiple interacting neurotransmitter systems in the brain stem, hypothalamus, and basal forebrain converge onto common effector systems in the thalamus and cortex. Sleep results from the inhibition of wake-promoting systems by homeostatic sleep factors such as adenosine and nitric oxide and GABAergic neurons in the preoptic area of the hypothalamus, resulting in large-amplitude, slow EEG oscillations. Local, activity-dependent factors modulate the amplitude and frequency of cortical slow oscillations. Non-rapid-eye-movement (NREM) sleep results in conservation of brain energy and facilitates memory consolidation through the modulation of synaptic weights. Rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep results from the interaction of brain stem cholinergic, aminergic, and GABAergic neurons which control the activity of glutamatergic reticular formation neurons leading to REM sleep phenomena such as muscle atonia, REMs, dreaming, and cortical activation. Strong activation of limbic regions during REM sleep suggests a role in regulation of emotion. Genetic studies suggest that brain mechanisms controlling waking and NREM sleep are strongly conserved throughout evolution, underscoring their enormous importance for brain function. Sleep disruption interferes with the normal restorative functions of NREM and REM sleep, resulting in disruptions of breathing and cardiovascular function, changes in emotional reactivity, and cognitive impairments in attention, memory, and decision making.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document