Topla at the Beginning of the XVIII Century

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalibor Elezovic

The research aims to point out how Venice incorporated Topla into its administrative system. Although the settlement came under Venetian control at the time of the conquest of Herceg Novi in 1687, despite several unsuccessful attempts, this area was fully integrated after the conclusion of peace in 1699 with the Ottoman Empire. Thus, the legal relations concerning the property rights over real estate were regulated in a way acceptable to Venetian interests. The paper is based on the published Cadastre of Herceg Novi and Risan from 1704 and the literature. The mentioned Cadastre reveals in full light how the Venetian government, accepting the real situation as a consequence of the Morean War (1684–1699), integrated the Topla area into its administrative apparatus.

10.12737/5501 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 53-61
Author(s):  
Павел Стрельников ◽  
Pavel Strelnikov

The question of the protection of property rights of legal entities in a market economy is of particular importance because it is the basis of their economic activities. Particularly acute this problem gives the specifics of the legal regime of the real estate, which has a significant impact on the choice of the means of protecting the violated rights, questioning the use of some of them. One of the methods of protection is indicated by replevin. The question of vindication as a way to protect the property rights of legal entities in the real estate is very controversial, because often put into question the very possibility of vindication property. The arguments for limiting the use of debt collection as a way to protect the rights of ownership of real estate can be divided into two groups. The first related to the essential characteristics of the real estate. The second is based on the legal regime of property, largely determined by the system of state registration of the respective object and deal with them. Based on an analysis of court decisions the author concludes that the feasibility of vindication by prohibiting the use of illegal property owner and the release of land, buildings, structures and premises in them from his property.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-56
Author(s):  
Utchay Augustine Okorji ◽  
Modupe Moronke Omirin

Real estate developments are characterised with risk and uncertainty. The more knowledge of the environment, unique characteristics and experience of a location, the easier it is to manage risk and reduce the possibility of unpleasant situations occurring. This article considers the risk profile of customary and statutory property rights in order to inform developers, investors and stakeholders on issues that need to be understood while dealing with such property rights in Port Harcourt. Litigations arising from intra-family and intra-communal disputes over boundaries are the main challenges to the security of customary property rights. On the other hand, the fallout of weak governance and conflicts between customary and statutory property rights constitute the major challenges to the security of statutory property rights. This article concludes by highlighting steps that could be taken to make Port Harcourt more investor friendly to the betterment of the real estate sector and the general economy.


Author(s):  
Artem Lyapanov

The article analyzes the rights and obligations of state peasants following the reform of P.D. Kiselev, one of the aims of which was to bring the real situation of this category of the population into line with their formal status as free peasant peasants. The personal and property rights of peasants are examined as well as their implementation under the new system of government; duties, most importantly, the payment of numerous duties and obligations. The authors concluded that the reformers were not able to achieve the desired results. The situation of state peasants was better than that of other categories of peasants. However, they did not become truly free peasants before the reform of 1866.


2020 ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
S.I. Denisenko ◽  
O.M. Rubanets

The article deals with topical issues of mortgage agreements, according to which the mortgage is transferred to the mortgage, the right of use of which are underage children, and the study of problematic issues of further recourse to such housing. As a result of resorting to a comprehensive interpretation of individual regulations and court decisions, the degree of legal uncertainty that coexists with such terminological term as “Housing for children to enjoy” has been investigated. The article contains a study of the norms of the law that ensure the realization of the child's right to use the mortgaged property, which in particular concludes that the legislator has identified sufficiently specific restrictions on the rights of parents to dispose of real estate (housing) to which they are entitled to use to the child. It is also noted that the permission of the guardianship authority is required not only if the child is the co-owner of the real estate, but also if there is only registration of the child in the accommodation. Attention is drawn to the fact that the very fact of registration of a child in residential real estate (when the child is not even a co-owner) already speaks of the need for obtaining the permission of the guardianship authority. After all, such actions (deeds) of parents, which by their essence limit the property rights of the child, can in no case be carried out without the permission of the guardianship and guardianship bodies. But if the guardianship authority has been granted permission to enter into a mortgage agreement, which provides for the mortgagee's right to satisfy his claims by selling the mortgage / acquisition of title to it, it means that such authority simultaneously consented to and alienate such property upon the occurrence of the property provided for in such transaction. According to the results of the study, deficiencies in the legislative regulation of the above issues were identified and the risks of violating a child's right to use mortgaged housing were identified. This made it possible to provide guidance on the practical avoidance of situations where a mortgage agreement was invalidated due to a violation of children's rights. At the same time, Ukrainian legislation, some scientific works of scientists were analyzed, which made it possible to speak about insufficient level of attention of scientists to such problems as protection of the rights of the borrower (mortgagee) and members of his family - minor children and, at the same time, introduction of responsibility of parents in the sphere. violation of the rights of the child.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document