The AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) pavement performance models and the associated AASHTOWare pavement ME design (PMED) software are nationally calibrated using design inputs and distress data largely obtained from National Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) to predict Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement (JPCP) performance measures. To improve the accuracy of nationally-calibrated JPCP performance models for various local conditions, further calibration and validation studies in accordance with the local conditions are highly recommended, and multiple updates have been made to the PMED since its initial release in 2011, with the latest version (i.e., Ver. 2.5.X) becoming available in 2019. Validation of JPCP performance models after such software updates is necessary as part of PMED implementation, and such local calibration and validation activities have been identified as the most difficult or challenging parts of PMED implementation. As one of the states at the forefront of implementing the MEPDG and PMED, Iowa has conducted local calibration of JPCP performance models extending from MEPDG to updated versions of PMED. The required MEPDG and PMED inputs and the historical performance data for the selected JPCP sections were extracted from a variety of sources and the accuracy of the nationally-calibrated MEPDG and PMED performance prediction models for Iowa conditions was evaluated. To improve the accuracy of model predictions, local calibration factors of MEPDG and PMED performance prediction models were identified and gained local calibration experiences of MEPDG and PMED in Iowa are presented and discussed here to provide insight of local calibration for other State Highway Agencies (SHAs).
Local calibration of the MEPDG prediction models for pavement rehabilitation and evaluation of top-down cracking for Oregon Roadways
