The Experience of Family in Japan and the United States: Working with the Constraints Inherent in Cross-Cultural Research

Since 2010, scholars have made major contributions to cross-cultural research, especially regarding similarities and differences across world regions and countries in people’s values, beliefs, and morality. This paper accumulates and analyzes extant multi-national and quantitative studies of these facets of global culture. The paper begins with a summary of the modern history of cross-cultural research, then systematically reviews major empirical studies published since 2010, and next analyzes extant approaches to interpret how the constructs of belief, morality, and values have been theorized and operationalized. The analysis reveals that the field of cross-cultural studies remains dominated by Western approaches, especially studies developed and deployed from the United States and Western Europe. While numerous surveys have been translated and employed for data collection in countries beyond the U.S. and Western Europe, several countries remain under-studied, and the field lacks approaches that were developed within the countries of interest. The paper concludes by outlining future directions for the study of cross-cultural research. To progress from the colonialist past embedded within cross-cultural research, in which scholars from the U.S. and Western Europe export research tools to other world regions, the field needs to expand to include studies locally developed and deployed within more countries and world regions.

Download Full-text

Translation as an Ecological Tool for Instrument Development

International Journal of Qualitative Methods ◽

10.1177/160940690700600205 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 40-58 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Andrey Vinokurov ◽

Daniel Geller ◽

Tamara L. Martin

Keyword(s):

Instrument Development ◽

The United States ◽

Cross Cultural ◽

Short Term ◽

Translation Process ◽

Cultural Research ◽

Cross Cultural Research ◽

American Society ◽

Theoretical Issues

In this paper the authors outline the translation process involved in Macro International's evaluation of the Department of State's International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP) in Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Georgia. IVLP is a long-running program in which professionals and prospective leaders from around the world participate in funded short-term visits to the United States to learn first-hand professional practices and values of American society and democracy. The authors highlight the importance of attending to the theoretical issues in, discuss contextual factors inherent in, and outline specific phases of the translation process, and present the modified decentering translation technique adapted for the project. They describe the types of translation equivalencies that were addressed and present findings that attest to the quality of the translation. They underscore the importance of the translation process as a qualitative tool for the instrument development that maps the contexts of people's lives, documents emic-etic aspects of cross-cultural research, and fosters collaborations with all stakeholders of the research project.

Download Full-text

Measurement of Family Management in Families of Individuals With Down Syndrome: A Cross-Cultural Investigation

Journal of Family Nursing ◽

10.1177/1074840720975167 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 107484072097516

Author(s):

Marcia Van Riper ◽

George J. Knafl ◽

Maria do Céu Barbieri-Figueiredo ◽

Maria Caples ◽

Hyunkyung Choi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Down Syndrome ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Internal Consistency Reliability ◽

The United States ◽

Cross Cultural ◽

Family Management ◽

Cultural Research ◽

The Family ◽

Cross Cultural Research ◽

Management Measure

Down syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic cause of intellectual disability worldwide. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the internal consistency reliability of eight language versions of the Family Management Measure (FaMM) and compare family management of DS across cultures. A total of 2,740 parents of individuals with DS from 11 countries completed the FaMM. The analysis provided evidence of internal consistency reliability exceeding .70 for four of six FaMM scales for the entire sample. Across countries, there was a pattern of positive family management. Cross-cultural comparisons revealed parents from Brazil, Spain, and the United States had the most positive family management and respondents from Ireland, Italy, Japan, and Korea had the least positive. The rankings were mixed for the four remaining countries. These findings provide evidence of overall strong internal consistency reliability of the FaMM. More cross-cultural research is needed to understand how social determinants of health influence family management in families of individuals with DS.

Download Full-text