Implementing Auxiliary through Lanes in Context of Highway Capacity Analysis

Author(s):  
Zachary Bugg ◽  
Nagui M. Rouphail ◽  
Bastian J. Schroeder ◽  
Brandon Nevers
2000 ◽  
Vol 1710 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuewen Le ◽  
Jian Lu ◽  
Edward A. Mierzejewski ◽  
Yanhu Zhou

The capacity analysis procedure for signalized intersections included in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) needs to consider the area type of a given intersection. The area-type adjustment factor used in the procedure is based on conclusions from a limited number of studies. In addition, the procedure for using an area-type adjustment factor is not well defined in the HCM. A study undertaken in central Florida to study the effects of four different area types on the capacity of signalized intersections is summarized. These four area types include recreational, business, residential, and shopping. Study results indicated that differences in saturation headways among different area types were significant. The saturation headways observed in recreational areas were significantly higher than those in other areas for both left-turn and through movements. The through-movement saturation headways obtained in residential, shopping, and business areas were not significantly different. This study resulted in a new area-type adjustment factor of 0.92 for recreational areas, whereas the factor is 1.00 for other areas. Results in this study also indicated that the differences in start-up lost time among different area types were not significantly different. In addition, according to the results of the analysis, 75 percent of the yellow interval in undersaturated conditions and 35 percent of the yellow interval in oversaturated conditions were found to be unused and considered clearance lost time.


1997 ◽  
Vol 1572 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie W. Hurley

The capacity of multiple through lanes at signalized intersections depends on the distribution of traffic within these lanes, with equal lane distribution corresponding to maximum capacity. However, traffic characteristics, land use, and geometric factors usually prohibit this from occurring. Although the 1994 update of the Highway Capacity Manual considers the case of continuous through lanes at signalized intersections, the default values provided do not address situations in which lane reduction takes place downstream of the intersection. Lane distribution data obtained in the field can remedy the situation but for existing conditions only. This research employed the concept of captive and choice lane users in modeling lane use for intersection configurations with a single continuous through lane and an “auxiliary” through lane, which is continuous upstream of the intersection but is dropped downstream of it. Stepwise multiple regression was performed on data collected at sites in Tennessee to ascertain those factors significantly affecting auxiliary lane use. These factors were found to be ( a) right turns off the facility at the intersection, ( b) total left turns off the facility downstream of the intersection, ( c) right turns onto the facility in the first 122 m (400 ft) upstream of the intersection, ( d) right turns off the facility in the last 152 m (500 ft) of the auxiliary lane, ( e) downstream auxiliary lane length, and ( f) the existence of left-turn bays or two-way continuous left-turn lanes downstream of the intersection. For the configuration studied, lane distribution data often differed considerably from the default values given in the Highway Capacity Manual.


1997 ◽  
Vol 1572 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghassan Abu-Lebdeh ◽  
Rahim F. Benekohal ◽  
Bashar Al-Omari

Models to estimate right-turn-on-red (RTOR) volumes at intersections with exclusive right-turn (RT) lanes are developed, and the effects of RTOR volumes on computed delay are assessed. The important variables in these models are the RT volume, followed by green-time-to-cycle (G/C) ratio, volume of conflicting traffic, and whether there is a protected phase for opposing left-turning vehicles. The estimated RTOR increased as the RTs increased. However, it decreased as G/C and the volume of conflicting traffic increased. Results show that not accounting for RTOR volumes can lead to a significant difference in delay estimates for RT lanes and, to a lesser extent, on the corresponding approaches. For RT lanes, in one-half of the cases the difference was greater than 5 percent, in more than one-quarter of the cases the difference was greater than 10 percent, and in at least one of eight cases the difference was greater than 20 percent. Differences for individual cases ranged between 0 and 130 percent, with an average of 12 percent. For approaches, the average delay difference was 4 percent, and for individual cases the difference ranged between −2 and 78 percent. As recommended by the Highway Capacity Manual, actual field counts of RTOR volume should be used whenever available. However, in the absence of such counts, the models developed here can be used and hence should be considered in capacity analysis procedures.


Author(s):  
Mohammed S. Tarawneh

To increase the capacity of through traffic at signalized intersections, additional lanes with limited length—called auxiliary lanes—are added to the roadway at the intersection. Because of their limited length, as well as other factors, these lanes are not as fully utilized as other continuous through lanes. Research was undertaken with two objectives: ( a) to observe and identify the level of use of auxiliary through lanes added at intersections of four-lane, two-way roadways; and ( b) to study the effects of auxiliary lane length, right-turn volume, and through/right-turn lane group delay on the level of their use. Lane-use data collected during 1,050 saturated cycles at eight signalized intersections with different auxiliary lane lengths were used to accomplish research objectives. All factors investigated—auxiliary lane length, right-turn volume, and stopped-delay—were found to contribute significantly to the use of auxiliary lanes at 0.01 level. The level of each factor’s contribution, however, was dependent on the level of the other two. Lane use of nearly one to seven straight-through vehicles per cycle, depending on levels of factors investigated, was observed at the study locations. Longer auxiliary lanes, lower right-turn volumes, and excessive approach delays encouraged the use of auxiliary lanes by straight-through vehicles. The range of lane utilization adjustment factors ( fLU-factors) calculated from field data was 0.73 to 0.82, which is lower than the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual default value of 0.91 for a three-lane through/right-turn group.


1997 ◽  
Vol 1572 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine C. McGhee ◽  
Eugene D. Arnold

Capacity analysis is a critical activity in traffic engineering and planning divisions of state departments of transportation across the nation. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) provides a methodology for capacity analysis that is commonly accepted and often required by state departments of transportation. The variety of computer programs that exist to aid transportation professionals in conducting capacity analyses has led to questions regarding the best methods to use under various conditions. Several computer programs other than the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) that are commonly used in evaluating capacity at signalized intersections were evaluated to determine which ones provide acceptable results. The results obtained from a simulation model were also evaluated to determine whether the model could be used to determine the operational characteristics of signalized intersections. The study results, although based on limited data, provided valuable information about the programs evaluated. HCS, SIGNAL94, HCM/Cinema, and the simulation model TRAF-NETSIM are all acceptable for capacity analysis at isolated intersections. SIGNAL94, HCM/Cinema, and TRAF-NETSIM provide reasonable estimates of queue length at isolated intersections. However, at isolated intersections where congested, oversaturated conditions exist, TRAF-NETSIM provides more accurate measures of delay and queue length. At nonisolated intersections where queueing and spill-back are potential problems, simulation analysis with TRAF-NETSIM is recommended instead of capacity analysis to determine the operational characteristics of the corridor.


Author(s):  
Werner Brilon ◽  
Justin Geistefeldt ◽  
Hendrik Zurlinden

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document