Utilization of Auxiliary Through Lanes at Intersections of Four-Lane, Two-Way Roadways

2000 ◽  
Vol 1737 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed S. Tarawneh
Keyword(s):  
Group Delay ◽  
Signalized Intersections ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Level Of Use ◽  
Adjustment Factors ◽  
Limited Length ◽  
Auxiliary Lanes ◽  
Auxiliary Through Lanes ◽  
Lane Utilization

To increase the capacity of through traffic at signalized intersections, additional lanes with limited length—called auxiliary lanes—are added to the roadway at the intersection. Because of their limited length, as well as other factors, these lanes are not as fully utilized as other continuous through lanes. Research was undertaken with two objectives: ( a) to observe and identify the level of use of auxiliary through lanes added at intersections of four-lane, two-way roadways; and ( b) to study the effects of auxiliary lane length, right-turn volume, and through/right-turn lane group delay on the level of their use. Lane-use data collected during 1,050 saturated cycles at eight signalized intersections with different auxiliary lane lengths were used to accomplish research objectives. All factors investigated—auxiliary lane length, right-turn volume, and stopped-delay—were found to contribute significantly to the use of auxiliary lanes at 0.01 level. The level of each factor’s contribution, however, was dependent on the level of the other two. Lane use of nearly one to seven straight-through vehicles per cycle, depending on levels of factors investigated, was observed at the study locations. Longer auxiliary lanes, lower right-turn volumes, and excessive approach delays encouraged the use of auxiliary lanes by straight-through vehicles. The range of lane utilization adjustment factors ( fLU-factors) calculated from field data was 0.73 to 0.82, which is lower than the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual default value of 0.91 for a three-lane through/right-turn group.

Utilization of Auxiliary Through Lanes at Signalized Intersections with Downstream Lane Reductions

1997 ◽  
Vol 1572 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie W. Hurley
Keyword(s):  
Signalized Intersections ◽  
Stepwise Multiple Regression ◽  
Distribution Data ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Left Turn ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Traffic Characteristics ◽  
Geometric Factors ◽  
Auxiliary Through Lanes ◽  
Right Turns

The capacity of multiple through lanes at signalized intersections depends on the distribution of traffic within these lanes, with equal lane distribution corresponding to maximum capacity. However, traffic characteristics, land use, and geometric factors usually prohibit this from occurring. Although the 1994 update of the Highway Capacity Manual considers the case of continuous through lanes at signalized intersections, the default values provided do not address situations in which lane reduction takes place downstream of the intersection. Lane distribution data obtained in the field can remedy the situation but for existing conditions only. This research employed the concept of captive and choice lane users in modeling lane use for intersection configurations with a single continuous through lane and an “auxiliary” through lane, which is continuous upstream of the intersection but is dropped downstream of it. Stepwise multiple regression was performed on data collected at sites in Tennessee to ascertain those factors significantly affecting auxiliary lane use. These factors were found to be ( a) right turns off the facility at the intersection, ( b) total left turns off the facility downstream of the intersection, ( c) right turns onto the facility in the first 122 m (400 ft) upstream of the intersection, ( d) right turns off the facility in the last 152 m (500 ft) of the auxiliary lane, ( e) downstream auxiliary lane length, and ( f) the existence of left-turn bays or two-way continuous left-turn lanes downstream of the intersection. For the configuration studied, lane distribution data often differed considerably from the default values given in the Highway Capacity Manual.

Models for Lane Utilization Prediction for Lane Drop Intersections

2005 ◽  
Vol 1912 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Joon Lee ◽  
Nagui M. Rouphail ◽  
Joseph E. Hummer
Keyword(s):  
North Carolina ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Signalized Intersections ◽  
Level Of Service ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Utilization Factor ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Multiple Regression Models ◽  
Geometric Variables ◽  
Lane Utilization

Lane drops downstream of signalized intersections can be found on many urban and suburban streets and highways. Because drivers tend to avoid using the short lane because of the potential for stressful merges downstream of the signal, the short lane is typically underused. Previous research indicates that the default lane utilization factors in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) appear to overestimate traffic in the short lane. The purpose of this research is to develop models to predict lane utilization factors for six intersection types and to assess how low lane utilization affects the observed intersection capacity and level of service. Traffic and signal data were collected at 47 sites in North Carolina. On the basis of 15 candidate factors, multiple regression models were developed for predicting the lane utilization factor. Field-measured delays were compared with delays estimated by the HCM with the use of regression models for lane utilization. It was found that even with the new models for lane utilization, the HCM consistently overestimated delay for all types of lane drop intersections with low lane utilization: a reassessment of the effect of lane utilization on capacity may be in order. This study also found that the downstream lane length and traffic intensity positively correlate with the lane utilization factor and that some geometric variables at the approach may also influence lane utilization.

Effect of Pedestrians on Capacity of Signalized Intersections

1998 ◽  
Vol 1646 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Milazzo ◽  
Nagui M. Rouphail ◽  
Joseph E. Hummer ◽  
D. Patrick Allen
Keyword(s):  
Signalized Intersections ◽  
Geometric Constraints ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Flow Adjustment ◽  
Conflict Zone ◽  
Adjustment Factors ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Saturation Flow ◽  
Green Period

In Chapter 9 of the 1994 update to the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, the operational and planning analysis of signalized intersections is discussed. The methodology for saturation flow rate estimation does not consider all elements of the interaction between pedestrians and turning vehicles. This study describes this interaction for left and right turns using a conflict-zone-occupancy approach. A conflict zone is a portion of an intersection, typically in the crosswalk, in which pedestrians and vehicles compete for space. Conflict-zone occupancy, defined as the fraction of the effective green period during which pedestrians occupy a conflict zone, provides the basis for a rational adjustment to saturation flow. This study details the results of a multiregional data collection effort that confirms the validity of the conflict-zone-occupancy approach. In addition, this study describes the effect of geometric constraints, as reflected in the number of receiving lanes versus the number of turning lanes, on turning-vehicle saturation flow. After consideration of signalized intersection phasing and turn protection, one can calculate saturation flow adjustment factors reflecting the effect of pedestrians on lane groups containing vehicles turning left ( fLpb) or right ( fRpb).

Model for Minimum Driveway Corner Clearances at Signalized Intersections

1997 ◽  
Vol 1579 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62
Author(s):  
Gary Long ◽  
Cheng-Tin Gan
Keyword(s):  
Signalized Intersections ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Flow Conditions ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Adjustment Factors ◽  
Saturation Flow ◽  
The Ideal

A signalized intersection typically operates under both saturated and undersaturated traffic flow conditions at different times of the day. When an intersection operates under saturated flow conditions, its ability to dissipate traffic becomes a primary matter of concern. On the other hand, safety is often the major concern due to higher vehicular travel speeds associated with undersaturated flow conditions. The minimum corner clearance distances required under the two different flow conditions are not the same. To be effective, minimum corner clearances must be set such that the needs under both types of flow conditions are satisfied. Existing guidelines for minimum corner clearances were reviewed, and none were found to address the capacity issue. A new model designed to meet both capacity and safety needs is proposed. The model produces a refined minimum corner clearance distance by applying a set of adjustment factors to an initial minimum corner clearance, a procedure similar to that of the familiar Highway Capacity Manual for adjusting the ideal saturation flow rate. Unlike existing guidelines, the proposed model is flexible, is much less discrete for continuous variables, and can easily incorporate as many factors affecting corner clearance as needed.

Modeling Capacity of Through Movement at Signalized Intersection Affected by Short Left-Turn Bay under Different Signal Settings

2021 ◽  
pp. 036119812110064
Author(s):  
Zihang Wei ◽  
Yunlong Zhang ◽  
Xiaoyu Guo ◽  
Xin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cycle Length ◽  
Signalized Intersections ◽  
Signalized Intersection ◽  
Essential Factor ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Left Turn ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Vehicle Demand ◽  
The One

Through movement capacity is an essential factor used to reflect intersection performance, especially for signalized intersections, where a large proportion of vehicle demand is making through movements. Generally, left-turn spillback is considered a key contributor to affect through movement capacity, and blockage to the left-turn bay is known to decrease left-turn capacity. Previous studies have focused primarily on estimating the through movement capacity under a lagging protected only left-turn (lagging POLT) signal setting, as a left-turn spillback is more likely to happen under such a condition. However, previous studies contained assumptions (e.g., omit spillback), or were dedicated to one specific signal setting. Therefore, in this study, through movement capacity models based on probabilistic modeling of spillback and blockage scenarios are established under four different signal settings (i.e., leading protected only left-turn [leading POLT], lagging left-turn, protected plus permitted left-turn, and permitted plus protected left-turn). Through microscopic simulations, the proposed models are validated, and compared with existing capacity models and the one in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The results of the comparisons demonstrate that the proposed models achieved significant advantages over all the other models and obtained high accuracies in all signal settings. Each proposed model for a given signal setting maintains consistent accuracy across various left-turn bay lengths. The proposed models of this study have the potential to serve as useful tools, for practicing transportation engineers, when determining the appropriate length of a left-turn bay with the consideration of spillback and blockage, and the adequate cycle length with a given bay length.

Validation of Generalized Delay Model for Vehicle-Actuated Traffic Signals

1997 ◽  
Vol 1572 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagui M. Rouphail ◽  
Mohammad Anwar ◽  
Daniel B. Fambro ◽  
Paul Sloup ◽  
Cesar E. Perez
Keyword(s):  
North Carolina ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Traffic Signals ◽  
Signalized Intersections ◽  
Delay Model ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Generalized Model ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Traffic Volumes ◽  
Isolated Intersection

One limitation of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) model for estimating delay at signalized intersections is its inadequate treatment of vehicle-actuated traffic signals. For example, the current delay model uses a single adjustment for all types of actuated control and is not sensitive to changes in actuated controller settings. The objective in this paper was to use TRAF-NETSIM and field data to evaluate a generalized delay model developed to overcome some of these deficiencies. NETSIM was used to estimate delay at an isolated intersection under actuated control, and the delay values obtained from NETSIM were then compared with those estimated by the generalized delay model. In addition, field data were collected from sites in North Carolina, and delays observed in the field were compared with those estimated by the generalized delay model. The delays estimated by the generalized model were comparable with the delays estimated by NETSIM. The data compared favorably for degrees of saturation of less than 0.8. However, at higher degrees of saturation, the generalized model produced delays that were higher than NETSIM’s. Some possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed. The delays estimated by the generalized model were comparable with delays observed in the field. Researchers have concluded that the generalized delay model is sensitive to changes in traffic volumes and vehicle-actuated controller settings and that the generalized delay model is much improved over the current HCM model in estimating delay at vehicle-actuated traffic signals.

Comparison of Planning and Operational Analysis Procedures for Signalized Intersections from the Highway Capacity Manual

1996 ◽  
Vol 1555 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-64
Author(s):  
Mark R. Virkler ◽  
Shashi Gannavaram ◽  
Anand Ramabhadran
Keyword(s):  
Level Of Service ◽  
Signal Timing ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Operational Procedure ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Operational Analysis ◽  
Planning Procedure ◽  
Adjustment Factors ◽  
Cycle Lengths ◽  
Traffic Signal Timing

The 1994 update of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) includes a planning procedure to estimate the capacity condition of a signalized intersection (Xcm). The planning method results can also be extended to a planning application of the more data-intensive HCM operational procedure to estimate intersection critical flow-to-capacity ratio (Xc) and level of service with only planning-level data. Both the planning procedure and the planning application of the operational procedure involve default adjustment factors and synthesized traffic signal timing (called the “default signal timing”). Data from 166 Missouri intersections were used to determine how well the planning approaches predict operational analysis results. In general, the default signal timings had shorter cycle lengths than the timing plans used at pretimed signals. The shorter cycle lengths led to slightly higher flow-to-capacity ratios, since a higher proportion of each cycle was devoted to lost time. The default signal timings also had more equal flow-to-capacity ratios within critical lane groups. The shorter cycle lengths and more equal flow-to-capacity ratios led to a predicted level of service that was the same or better than that calculated for actual conditions. For the subject intersections, locally calibrated default adjustment factors yielded better predictions of flow-to-capacity ratios and level of service than the HCM defaults. The planning value for Xcm was often less than the actual Xc for operational analysis of actual conditions. This was to be expected since Xcm is based on the maximum allowable cycle length. The HCM planning procedure is expected to receive wide use in a variety of planning and design applications. Calibration of appropriate local default values should improve the accuracy of the planning procedure results.

Evaluating the Operational Effect of Narrow Lanes and Shoulders for the Highway Capacity Manual

2019 ◽  
Vol 2673 (10) ◽  
pp. 558-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Kondyli ◽  
David K. Hale ◽  
Mohamadamin Asgharzadeh ◽  
Bastian Schroeder ◽  
Anxi Jia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traffic Congestion ◽  
Flow Speed ◽  
Mitigation Strategies ◽  
Analytical Models ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Lane Width ◽  
Adjustment Factors ◽  
Manual Methods ◽  
Width Reduction

Unnecessary traffic delays and vehicle emissions have adverse effects on quality of life. To solve the traffic congestion problem in the U.S.A., mitigation or elimination of bottlenecks is a top priority. Agencies across the U.S.A. have deployed several congestion mitigation strategies, such as lane and shoulder width reduction, which aim to adding lanes without significantly altering the footprint of the freeway. A limited number of studies have evaluated the operational benefits of lane narrowing. Although the Highway Capacity Manual does account for lane and shoulder widths, the adjustments that it provides are outdated. The goal of this research was to develop analytical models, compatible with the Highway Capacity Manual methods, to account for lane and shoulder width narrowing, using field data from across the U.S.A. This paper presents a new free-flow speed regression model, which accounts for lane and shoulder widths, and capacity adjustment factors depending on the lane width.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document