Reframing norms: boundary maintenance and partial accommodations in the work of academic technology transfer

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 689-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie B Sanders ◽  
Fiona Alice Miller
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-32
Author(s):  
Krystian Gurba

Organizations managing technology transfer from universities to the private sector, although born in Poland with a significant delay compared to Western European countries, are currently important actors in the Polish innovation system. The article summarizes the process of shaping the role and models of the functioning of these organizations. It discusses the status and functions of technology transfer centers and the institutional environment of academic technology transfer in Poland: legal framework, support programs, and partner organizations. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of cooperation networks in technology transfer and draws attention to specific initiatives focused on technology transfer in the biotechnology and pharmacy sectors.


2009 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. 1481-1488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Alice Miller ◽  
Carrie B. Sanders ◽  
Pascale Lehoux

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1289-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian D. Eusemann ◽  
Barry E. Sammons ◽  
David R. Holmes ◽  
Thomas J. Brady ◽  
Irina Erenburg ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B Klusas ◽  
Raymond H. Cypess ◽  
Seth Rosenfield ◽  
Adam Gerstein

This paper is an examination of the economics, organizational dynamics and structural factors inhibiting an electronic market for intellectual property.  Several intermediaries exist to facilitate the transition of intellectual property (IP) from sellers to buyers.  Over the past 20 years, a number of companies attempted to create an online “eBay for IP.”  These IP Exchanges (IPEs) failed to gain traction in competition with other mediums that provide channels to facilitate IP transactions.  Compounding the problem is the concentration of intellectual property assets amongst a small group of institutions and within those institutions as well as organizational hurdles inherent in academic technology transfer offices.  As a result, the business model for an online IPE market is fundamentally challenging, and no successful IPE exists to date.


2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Landrio McDevitt ◽  
Joelle Mendez-Hinds ◽  
David Winwood ◽  
Vinit Nijhawan ◽  
Todd Sherer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
I. Novikova

The evolution of the transformation of the essence of the main innovation-entrepreneurial models in technological transfer is analyzed. It is shown that the emergence of new models of technology transfer is caused by: new forms of competition, changes in public requests and needs, choice of the way of technology implementation, the need to increase revenue, etc. It was found that the modern content of technology transfer models was formed on the basis of previous theories, which directly or indirectly took into account: interests of the research industry, consumer requests and behavior, state priorities and peculiarities of economic relationships between all subjects of the innovation process. Chronological systematization of the main innovative-entrepreneurial models in technology transfer has been carried out. The strengths and weaknesses of the major models of technological transfer are identified, as well as the importance of strategic planning in implementing the process of academic technology transfer. It is proven that modeling in a knowledge-intensive business is able to help solve many common problems that are now encountered in commercial technology transfer. The potential of activating technological transfer in research universities through the lens of the concept of “open” innovations by H. Chesbrough is revealed. The risks and probable conflicts of interest of this concept have been identified. The advantages of the circular model of technology transfer are analyzed. The strategic mistakes made in the science-intensive business are shown.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitri Schuurman ◽  
Stan De Vocht ◽  
Sven De Cleyn ◽  
Aron-Levi Herregodts

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document