Physical Activity and Its Impact on Colon Cancer Surgery

Author(s):  
Author(s):  
Kiho You ◽  
Dae Kyung Sohn ◽  
Sung Sil Park ◽  
Sung Chan Park ◽  
Jae Hwan Oh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Furutani ◽  
Chikashi Hiranuma ◽  
Masakazu Hattori ◽  
Kenji Doden ◽  
Yasuo Hashizume

Abstract Background Portal venous gas has traditionally been considered an inevitable harbinger of death due to its association with bowel necrosis. Recently, an increasing number of cases of portal venous gas have been reported in patients with various clinical conditions and without bowel necrosis. We herein report the case of a patient in whom portal venous gas developed after transverse colon cancer surgery. Case presentation A 69-year-old man who had transverse colon cancer underwent insertion of a transanal ileus tube for decompression. Transverse colon resection was performed on the 11th day after the insertion of the transanal ileus tube. The patient had a high fever on the 6th day after the operation. Computed tomography showed portal venous gas over the entire area of the liver and pneumatosis intestinalis in the wall of the ascending colon. There were no signs of anastomotic leakage or bowel necrosis, so we decided to use conservative therapy with fasting and antibiotics. The portal venous gas disappeared on the 19th day after the operation. The patient was discharged in good condition on the 29th day after the operation. Conclusions Conservative treatment for portal venous gas is reasonable for patients without signs of anastomotic leakage or bowel necrosis. However, it is important to carefully observe patients with portal venous gas during conservative treatment because portal venous gas may be life-threatening.


Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arvid Pourlotfi ◽  
Rebecka Ahl Hulme ◽  
Maximilian Peter Forssten ◽  
Gabriel Sjolin ◽  
Gary A. Bass ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 775-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Abdelrazeq ◽  
N. Scott ◽  
C. Thorn ◽  
C. S. Verbeke ◽  
N. S. Ambrose ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 967-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Finlayson ◽  
Shoujun Zhao ◽  
W. John Boscardin ◽  
Brant E. Fries ◽  
C. Seth Landefeld ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Manceau ◽  
Antoine Brouquet ◽  
Pascal Chaibi ◽  
Guillaume Passot ◽  
Olivier Bouché ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Several multicenter randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopy and conventional open surgery for colon cancer have demonstrated that laparoscopic approach achieved the same oncological results while improving significantly early postoperative outcomes. These trials included few elderly patients, with a median age not exceeding 71 years. However, colon cancer is a disease of the elderly. More than 65% of patients operated on for colon cancer belong to this age group, and this proportion may become more pronounced in the coming years. In current practice, laparoscopy is underused in this population. Methods The CELL (Colectomy for cancer in the Elderly by Laparoscopy or Laparotomy) trial is a multicenter, open-label randomized, 2-arm phase III superiority trial. Patients aged 75 years or older with uncomplicated colonic adenocarcinoma or endoscopically unresectable colonic polyp will be randomized to either colectomy by laparoscopy or laparotomy. The primary endpoint of the study is overall postoperative morbidity, defined as any complication classification occurring up to 30 days after surgery. The secondary endpoints are: 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality, 30-day readmission rate, quality of surgical resection, health-related quality of life and evolution of geriatric assessment. A 35 to 20% overall postoperative morbidity rate reduction is expected for patients operated on by laparoscopy compared with those who underwent surgery by laparotomy. With a two-sided α risk of 5% and a power of 80% (β = 0.20), 276 patients will be required in total. Discussion To date, no dedicated randomized controlled trial has been conducted to evaluate morbidity after colon cancer surgery by laparoscopy or laparotomy in the elderly and the benefits of laparoscopy is still debated in this context. Thus, a prospective multicenter randomized trial evaluating postoperative outcomes specifically in elderly patients operated on for colon cancer by laparoscopy or laparotomy with curative intent is warranted. If significant, such a study might change the current surgical practices and allow a significant improvement in the surgical management of this population, which will be the vast majority of patients treated for colon cancer in the coming years. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03033719 (January 27, 2017).


2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Schootman ◽  
Donna B. Jeffe ◽  
Kendra L. Ratnapradipa ◽  
Jan M. Eberth ◽  
Nicholas O. Davidson

2010 ◽  
Vol 200 (4) ◽  
pp. 478-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared H. Linebarger ◽  
Michelle A. Mathiason ◽  
Kara J. Kallies ◽  
Stephen B. Shapiro

2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1380
Author(s):  
Ira Leeds ◽  
Jonathan Efron ◽  
Bashar Safar ◽  
Sandy Fang ◽  
Fabian M. Johnston

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document