Hyperthermia and Olaparib in Treating Breast Cancer Patients With Chest Wall Recurrences

Author(s):  
Author(s):  
Geraldine M. Jacobson ◽  
Lee K. McNeely ◽  
Dennis D. Leavitt ◽  
J. Robert Stewart

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 48-48
Author(s):  
Shramana Mitul Banerjee ◽  
Jackie Newby ◽  
Shahab Khan ◽  
Virginia Homfray ◽  
Diane Whittaker ◽  
...  

48 Background: Electrochemotherapy (ECT) combines the administration of poorly permeable chemotherapeutic agents with electroporation. It has been shown to be effective when compared with other treatments. This study assessed how breast cancer patients were benefited and identified potential problems at a designated treatment centre. Methods: This was a single centre prospective study of patients with cutaneous metastases from breast cancer. Patients who fulfilled NICE UK (National Institute Of Clinical Excellence) and local guidelines were treated. Gabapentin was given prior to general anaesthesia. Intravenous Bleomycin 15,000IU/m2 was given as a bolus. Treatment was commenced 8 minutes later with Cliniporator. Electrical pulses were delivered via an electrode inserted through the skin surface. Treatment response, disease progression free duration, post-operative pain and length of in-patient stay (LOS) were recorded. Patients recorded a symptom diary post treatment. Results: 20 treatments were performed in 16 patients from 2011-2015 with 53 separate areas treated. 8 patients had diffuse lesions, 5 had discrete lesions and 3 had both diffuse and discrete areas. 16 patients were being treated with ECT for the first time and 4 patients required 2 treatments. Median LOS was 3 days. Median follow up was 6 months (range 3-12).12 patients had complete response (75%) and 4 patients partial response. There was no disease progression for 6 months or more in 9 patients (56%) and 2 further patients had disease stabilised for 3 months with systemic or cutaneous progression in the remaining patients in 3 months or less. There were no deaths or immediate adverse events from ECT. 5 Patients (31%) with extensive diffuse chest wall disease reported persistent discomfort post treatment requiring extended period of post treatment analgesia. Conclusions: Electrochemotherapy is safe and effective treatment for cutaneous metastases. Appropriate patient selection for treatment, pre-emptive analgesia, post treatment support and follow up is essential in order to maximise the benefits and minimise potential side-effects particularly in extensive chest wall disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu-Ran Zhao ◽  
Liang Xuan ◽  
Jun Yin ◽  
Yu Tang ◽  
Hui-Ru Sun ◽  
...  

Background and PurposeOptimal radiation target volumes for breast cancer patients with their first isolated chest wall recurrence (ICWR) after mastectomy are controversial. We aimed to analyze the regional failure patterns and to investigate the role of prophylactic regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for ICWR.Materials and MethodsAltogether 205 patients with ICWR after mastectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Post-recurrence progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and the differences were compared with Log-rank test. Competing risk model was used to estimate the subsequent regional recurrence (sRR) and locoregional recurrence (sLRR) rates, and the differences were compared with Gray test.ResultsThe 5-year sRR rate was 25.2% with median follow-up of 88.6 months. Of the 52 patients with sRR, 30 (57.7%) recurred in the axilla, 29 (55.8%) in supraclavicular fossa (SC), and five (9.6%) in internal mammary nodes. Surgery plus radiotherapy was independently associated with better sLRR and PFS rates (p<0.001). The ICWR interval of ≤ 4 years was associated with unfavorable sRR (p=0.062), sLRR (p=0.014), PFS (p=0.001), and OS (p=0.005). Among the 157 patients who received radiotherapy after ICWR, chest wall plus RNI significantly improved PFS (p=0.004) and OS (p=0.021) compared with chest wall irradiation alone. In the 166 patients whose ICWR interval was ≤ 4 years, chest wall plus RNI provided the best PFS (p<0.001) and OS (p=0.022) compared with chest wall irradiation alone or no radiotherapy.ConclusionPatients with ICWR have a high-risk of sRR in SC and axilla. Chest wall plus RNI is recommended.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehlam Kausar ◽  
Om Prakash Gurjar ◽  
Priyusha Bagdare ◽  
Krishna Lal Gupta ◽  
Virendra Bhandari ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundFor chest wall irradiation in breast cancer patients, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) have made tremendous changes in treatment delivery.PurposeThe purpose of this study is to compare the dosimetric parameters in IMRT and 3DCRT plans.Materials and methodsIMRT and 3DCRT plans were generated for 25 randomly selected postmastectomy breast cancer patients. The prescribed dose (PD) was 50 Gray (Gy) in 25 fractions (#) at the rate of 2 Gy/# with 5#/week. Dose volume histogram was evaluated for planning target volume (PTV) coverage and dose to organs at risk (OARs). All the dosimetric parameters were compared using unpaired student’s t-test.ResultsPTV coverage was significantly better in IMRT, although the 90% of PTV was well covered by 90% of PD in all plans by both the techniques. Homogeneity index and conformity index were better in IMRT. V5 Gy and Dmean of contralateral lung, contralateral breast and heart (right side chest wall cases) were found to be lesser in 3DCRT compared with that in IMRT. However, there was no significant difference in V20 Gy of ipsilateral lung and V25 Gy of heart (left side chest wall cases) in all the plans by both the techniques.ConclusionAdequate target coverage was achieved by both the techniques, however, dose to OARs were lesser in 3DCRT plans as compared with that in IMRT plans. Thus, it can be concluded that 3DCRT is as efficient as IMRT for the chest wall irradiation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document