Efficacy of Chemopreventive Agents on Disease-free and Overall Survival in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: The CAOS Study

Author(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-121
Author(s):  
V. U. Rayn ◽  
◽  
M. A. Persidskiy ◽  
E. V. Malakhova ◽  
I. V. Anuchina ◽  
...  

Aim. To establish the association between pancreatic cancer precursor lesions and chronic opisthorchiasis. Materials and methods. A single center case-control study was conducted at a low-volume pancreatic surgery center in Khanty-Mansiysk. We retrospectively collected morphological data from 47 pancreatoduodenectomies performed for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The study group included 23 cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with concomitant chronic Opisthorchis felineus invasion which were compared to 24 controls consisting of “pure” cancer. Qualitative analysis was performed using χ2 Pearson criterion. Exact Fisher test was used for small samples. Time to progression and overall survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Data were collected and analyzed in Statistica 7.0. Results. PanINs were seen in 41,7% pancreata resected for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head and in 95,7% cases of pancreatic cancer in background of chronic opisthorchiasis (р = 0,000; 95% CI 3,5-268). PanIN high grade were observed only in opisthorchiasis group. In mixed pathology invasive cancer component tended to be more dedifferentiated and advanced when compared to pure cancer group (p = 0,029). Median disease free survival was 9 mo. in both groups and overall survival was 13 mo. in non-opisthorchiasis group and 15,3 mo. in opisthorchiasis group (р = 0,437). Conclusion. Chronic opisthorchiasis is associated with pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in background of opisthorchiasis with preneoplastic lesions tend to be more advanced in stage and poorly differentiated. Disease free and overall survival have no statistically significant differences in patients with and without Opisthorchis felineus invasion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 5271-5279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuichi Mitsunaga ◽  
Eiji Kasamatsu ◽  
Koji Machii

Abstract Purpose Cachexia influences the patient’s physical wellbeing and quality of life, and the patient’s ability to tolerate their cancer therapies, especially cytotoxic chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and timing of onset of cancer cachexia during chemotherapy and its association with prognosis and toxicity in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods We performed a retrospective study in patients who underwent first-line chemotherapy after diagnosis of advanced PDAC between 6 June 2008 and 31 March 2017. Base cachexia (weight loss up to 6 months before starting first-line chemotherapy) and follow-up cachexia (after starting first-line chemotherapy) were defined as weight loss > 2% with a body mass index (BMI) < 20 kg/m2 or weight loss > 5%. Results A total of 150 patients were registered. The median age and BMI were 65 years and 21.7 kg/m2, respectively. Base cachexia occurred in 50% of patients. Follow-up cachexia occurred in 32% within 12 weeks of starting first-line chemotherapy, reaching 64% at 1 year. Overall survival was not significantly different between patients with and without follow-up cachexia, regardless of whether cancer cachexia occurred within 12, 24, or 48 weeks of starting first-line treatment. Appetite loss, fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea were more frequent in patients with follow-up cachexia than in those without follow-up cachexia. Conclusion Follow-up cachexia had an early onset, but was not a prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with PDAC. Some adverse events tended to be more frequent in patients with follow-up cachexia than in those without follow-up cachexia.


2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie A. Lockney ◽  
Manchao Zhang ◽  
Yanzhen Lu ◽  
Sabrina C. Sopha ◽  
M. Kay Washington ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S127-S128
Author(s):  
H. Williams ◽  
M.R. Jajja ◽  
S. Hashmi ◽  
K. Cardona ◽  
S.K. Maithel ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ningzhen FU ◽  
Yu JIANG ◽  
Kai QIN ◽  
Xiaxing DENG ◽  
Hao CHEN ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Whether body mass index (BMI) was associated with the overall survival (OS) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remained controversial and uncertain.Method: A total of 2,010 patients from single high-volume center were enrolled in the study. OS of PDAC patients was evaluated based on restricted cubic spline (RCS), propensity score (PS) and multivariable risk adjustment analyses. Result: BMI was discovered linear related with OS (total P=0.004, non-linear P=0.124). BMI was analyzed as categorical data based on X-tile software defined cutoffs and World Health Organization (WHO) recommended cutoffs, respectively. Adjusted with confounding covariates, higher BMI manifested as a positive prognostic predictor. (PXtile=0.003, PWHO=0.002) Furtherly, BMI was proven associated with OS in PS analysis. (UnderweightXtile vs. NormalXtile P=0.003, OverweightXtile vs. NormalXtile P=0.019; UnderweightWHO vs. NormalWHO P<0.001, OverweightWHO vs. NormalWHO P=0.024). It was also revealed that patients with higher BMI benefitted more from chemotherapy.(adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): UnderweightXtile: 0.565 (0.389-0.819), NormalXtile: 0.474 (0.395-0.567), OverweightXtile: 0.409 (0.337-0.496); UnderweightWHO: 0.613 (0.401-0.940), NormalWHO: 0.464 (0.387-0.557), OverweightWHO: 0.425 (0.353-0.512)). Conclusion: Among PDAC patients, higher BMI manifested as a favorable OS indicator, and the protective impact was probably based on chemotherapy administration. Patients with higher BMI were also observed with more chemotherapy administration and more OS benefits from chemotherapy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-285
Author(s):  
Rohit Das ◽  
Natalie Seiser ◽  
Kevin McGrath ◽  
Randall Brand ◽  
Jennifer S. Chennat ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Jun Park ◽  
Hyunho Kim ◽  
Kabsoo Shin ◽  
Tae Ho Hong ◽  
Ja Hee Suh ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundAccording to the NAPOLI-1 trial, nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) showed improved overall survival compared to fluorouracil alone for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who previously treated gemcitabine-based therapy. In that trial, Asian patients had frequent dose modification due to hematological toxicity. There has been limited information on the clinical benefit and toxicity of this regimen in a real-world setting. Herein, we assessed real-world experience of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure.MethodsWe conducted a single institution retrospective analysis of response, survival and safety in patients who had been treated with nal-IRI with 5-FU/LV. Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy received nal-IRI (80mg/m2) with 5-FU/LV every 2 weeks. ResultsFifty-one patients received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV between January 2015 and December 2020. The median age was 67 years, and males were 58.8%. A total of 40 (78.4%) and 11 (21.6%) patients had received one and two lines of prior chemotherapy before enrollment, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-3.7) and median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9). Chemotherapy doses were reduced or delayed in 33 (64.7%) patients during the first 6 weeks and median relative dose intensity was 0.87. Thirty-six (70.6%) patients experienced any grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was neutropenia (58.8%) and most non-hematologic adverse events were under grade 2. Since the start of first-line chemotherapy, median overall survival was 16.3 months (95% CI 14.1-18.4).ConclusionsNal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV seems to be effective, with manageable toxicities, after gemcitabine-based treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Trial registration Retrospectively registered


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1986-1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne Lof ◽  
◽  
Maarten Korrel ◽  
Jony van Hilst ◽  
Adnan Alseidi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Several studies have suggested a survival benefit of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the pancreatic head. Data concerning NAT for PDAC located in pancreatic body or tail are lacking. Methods Post hoc analysis of an international multicenter retrospective cohort of distal pancreatectomy for PDAC in 34 centers from 11 countries (2007–2015). Patients who underwent resection after NAT were matched (1:1 ratio), using propensity scores based on baseline characteristics, to patients who underwent upfront resection. Median overall survival was compared using the stratified log-rank test. Results Among 1236 patients, 136 (11.0%) received NAT, most frequently FOLFIRINOX (25.7%). In total, 94 patients receiving NAT were matched to 94 patients undergoing upfront resection. NAT was associated with less postoperative major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3a, 10.6% vs. 23.4%, P = 0.020) and pancreatic fistula grade B/C (9.6% vs. 21.3%, P = 0.026). NAT did not improve overall survival [27 (95% CI 14–39) versus 31 months (95% CI 19–42), P = 0.277], as compared with upfront resection. In a sensitivity analysis of 251 patients with radiographic tumor involvement of splenic vessels, NAT (n = 37, 14.7%) was associated with prolonged overall survival [36 (95% CI 18–53) versus 20 months (95% CI 15–24), P = 0.049], as compared with upfront resection. Conclusion In this international multicenter cohort study, NAT for resected PDAC in pancreatic body or tail was associated with less morbidity and pancreatic fistula but similar overall survival in comparison with upfront resection. Prospective studies should confirm a survival benefit of NAT in patients with PDAC and splenic vessel involvement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document