scholarly journals Diagnostic delay for head and neck cancer in South India: A Mixed-methods Study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1673-1678
Author(s):  
Sivaraman Ganesan ◽  
Sivanesan Sivagnanganesan ◽  
Mahalakshmy Thulasingam ◽  
Gunaseelan Karunanithi ◽  
Kalaiarasi R ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnie K.W. So ◽  
Cho-Lee Wong ◽  
Kai-Chow Choi ◽  
Carmen W.H. Chan ◽  
Joanne C.Y. Chan ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 3257-3268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Ganzer ◽  
Pamela Rothpletz-Puglia ◽  
Laura Byham-Gray ◽  
Barbara A. Murphy ◽  
Riva Touger-Decker

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 342-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Moorhouse ◽  
Daniel Edwards

Head and neck cancer is a rare, but significantly life-changing diagnosis. Mortality is still high in advanced disease and treatment carries significant morbidity (both physical and psychological). Patients who suffer with the disease have often experienced diagnostic delay and uncertainty with harmful physical and psychological consequences. This experience can be frustrating for patients and with delay they may feel that their needs are not being met, and that they are not being taken seriously. This article aims to detail appropriate referral of patients and recent developments in the treatment and management of head and neck cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-218
Author(s):  
Manali Deb Barma ◽  
Meignana Arumugham Indiran ◽  
Pradeep Kumar R ◽  
Arthi Balasubramaniam ◽  
M.P Santhosh Kumar

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin R Smith ◽  
Torres Woolley ◽  
Amy Brown ◽  
Venkat Vangaveti ◽  
Madhavi Chilkuri

Abstract Background This study investigated the smoking behaviours and cessation rates of head and neck cancer patients and explored the barriers and facilitators to cessation. Methods A mixed methods sequential explanatory design was utilised. The quantitative data was collected through surveys prior to treatment commencement. The current smokers were followed up after treatment to determine their smoking status. One-on-one, semi-structured interviews were then conducted. Results A total of 64 participants were recruited. Participants who were current smokers were more likely to live in a rural location (p = 0.015), have lower education (p = 0.047), and report reduced social and family well-being (p = 0.005) when compared with those who were former or never smokers. The 7-day point prevalence cessation rate was 72% at 1-month follow-up and 67% at 3 months, while continuous smoking cessation was 54% at 1 month and 42% at 3 months. Participants who continued smoking were found to consume more alcohol (p = 0.032) and have higher psychological distress (p = 0.052). Qualitative analysis revealed 5 key themes associated with smoking cessation: the teachable moment of a cancer diagnosis and treatment, willpower and cessation aids, psychosocial environment, relationship with alcohol and marijuana, and health knowledge and beliefs surrounding smoking and cancer. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the majority of head and neck cancer patients are able to achieve smoking cessation, but relapses are common. Future cessation programs should be comprehensive, sustained and address co-morbid factors such as alcohol, marijuana and depression.


2020 ◽  
Vol 134 (8) ◽  
pp. 680-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Warner ◽  
D W Scholfield ◽  
A Adams ◽  
P Richards ◽  
S Ali ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic requires urgent modification to existing head and neck cancer diagnosis and management practices. A protocol was established that utilises risk stratification, early investigation prior to clinical review and a reduction in aerosol generating procedures to lessen the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 spread.MethodsTwo-week wait referrals were stratified into low, intermediate and high risk. Low risk patients were referred back to primary care with advice; intermediate and high risk patients underwent investigation. Clinical encounters and aerosol generating procedures were minimised. A combined diagnostic and therapeutic surgical approach was undertaken where possible.ResultsForty-one patients were used to assess feasibility. Thirty-one per cent were low risk, 35 per cent were intermediate and 33 per cent were high risk. Thirty-three per cent were discharged with no imaging.ConclusionImplementing this protocol reduces the future burden on tertiary services, by empowering primary care physicians to re-refer low risk patients. The protocol is applicable across the UK and avoids diagnostic delay.


2005 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Brouha ◽  
Debbie Tromp ◽  
Gert-Jan Hordijk ◽  
Jacques Winnubst ◽  
Rob De Leeuw

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document