scholarly journals Need for an Integrative Conceptual Framework for Addressing Mental Health Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2022 ◽  
Vol 31 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 75-100
Author(s):  
Bayan Jalalizadeh

The burden of mental illness across the globe, already significant, has grown dramatically since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is, in part, due to limitations in the current conceptual frameworks for understanding mental illness and resulting methods of practice. This paper provides an overview of the state of mental health and illness in the world, summarizes the prevailing frameworks and practices, and introduces a potential framework which could guide a response to the mental health challenges of the pandemic.

Author(s):  
Robbie Duschinsky ◽  
Sarah Foster

The theory of mentalizing and epistemic trust introduced by Peter Fonagy and colleagues at the Anna Freud Centre has been an important perspective on mental health and illness. This book is the first comprehensive account and evaluation of this perspective. The book explores 20 primary concepts that organize the contributions of Fonagy and colleagues: adaptation, aggression, the alien self, culture, disorganized attachment, epistemic trust, hypermentalizing, reflective function, the p-factor, pretend mode, the primary unconscious, psychic equivalence, mental illness, mentalizing, mentalization-based therapy, non-mentalizing, the self, sexuality, the social environment, and teleological mode. The biographical and social context of the development of these ideas is examined. The book also specifies the current strengths and limitations of the theory of mentalizing and epistemic trust, with attention to the implications for both clinicians and researchers.


Author(s):  
Diane E. Goldstein

In chapter 7, “Deranged Psychopaths and Victims Who Go Insane: Visibility and Invisibility in the Depiction of Mental Health and Illness in Contemporary Legend,” Diane E. Goldstein analyzes the portrayal of mental illness in contemporary legends, focusing on the values inherent in depictions of demented killers, quietly “mad” neighbors, and psychologically damaged victims. Taken as a group and read as parallel texts, Goldstein argues that these narratives construct and present a complex of images of mental health and illness set in changing historical and cultural contexts. Together, she asserts, the narratives create explanatory categories for mental illness and convey popular understandings of “madness”; they equate insanity with visibility of difference; they explore the gendered associations of male aggression and female passivity, and they pinpoint areas of socially tolerable and intolerable deviance.


Author(s):  
Dan P. McAdams

As a short digression into the world of psychiatric diagnosis, the chapter “Goldwater” discusses the controversy over whether or not mental health professionals should diagnose President Trump with a mental illness, such as narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). The chapter’s title recalls the 1964 U.S. presidential election wherein the results of a survey of psychiatrists were published in an American magazine, concluding that the Republican candidate Barry Goldwater was mentally unfit to hold office. Goldwater later sued the magazine, and the case led to what has become known as the Goldwater Rule, prohibiting psychiatrists from diagnosing public officials from afar. The chapter makes a clear distinction between psychiatric diagnosis, which adopts the language of medicine and illness, on the one hand, and psychological commentary on the other. The latter conception better characterizes what the current book aims to accomplish. Psychological commentary draws from psychological science to develop a personality portrait of a person, without diagnosis and without judgment regarding mental health and illness. Moreover, Donald Trump is much stranger than any psychiatric label can convey.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwayne Devonish

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the perceptions of private and public sector managers in Barbados regarding the concepts of mental health and illness at work. It also explored their interactions and experiences with persons with mental illness at work and various forms of support and resources needed to improve the overall management of these persons within the organisational setting. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative study used an exploratory research design based on two focus groups of private and public sector managers. Findings The findings revealed that both private and public sector managers understood the distinction between the concepts of mental health and mental illness. However, managers believed that high levels of stigma and discrimination exist in both private and public sector workplaces due to a lack of understanding of mental illness, cultural norms, and socialisation in Barbados regarding mental illness and negative stereotypes. However, workplace education and promotion, associated workplace policies, and employee assistance programmes (EAPs) were identified as key strategies for effectively addressing issues of mental health stigma and the management of persons with mental illness at work. Research limitations/implications Due to the qualitative approach used and small sample selected based on non-probability sampling, generalising the findings to larger populations is heavily cautioned. Practical implications Organisations in both private and public sectors should emphasise workplace mental health interventions such as mental health education and awareness, the development and implementation of supportive and flexible policies, and EAPs. These strategies are likely to help destigmatisation efforts and enhance managers’ understanding of mental health and the management of persons with mental illness. Originality/value This study provided a rich and in-depth understanding of mental health and illness from the perspective of private and public sector managers in a small developing country in the Caribbean. The Caribbean region possesses a dearth of empirical research concerning issues of mental health and illness at work.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosanna Bell

Children with a mental illness may be at a significant risk of suffering from negative social evaluations and the exclusion of their peers. This paper examined healthy preschool children's earliest conceptual constructions of mental health and illness through two elected representations - the term crazy and depictions of emotionally and behaviourally deviant peers. Interviews with eleven preschool children reveal the concept of mental illness has yet to be constructed from a psychological standpoint. However, preschool children are highly sensitive to social-conventional as well as higher moral codes and discriminate against peers' who violate these codes, particulary those who display anti-social tendencies. Findings suggest that preschool is a formative period for establishing negative attitudes towards social and moral code violating behaviours that are often the symptoms of psychiatric conditions and which may represent the onset of more complex and enduring patterns of inter-group intolerance and discrimination. Implications for education are provided.


Author(s):  
Ahmed Okasha ◽  
Tarek A. Okasha

Psychiatry is the branch of medicine that most prominently incorporates the humanities and social sciences in its scientific base and in its treatment of illness. Psychiatry has often needed to go well beyond the world of natural science into the philosophical realm. Psychiatry and religion both draw upon rich traditions of human thought and practice. Mental health providers in developed countries are increasingly treating patients whose backgrounds are very different from their own, so it is important for them to understand cultural belief systems including religious thought and practice that relate to mental health and illness. Psychiatry and religion are parallel and complementary frames of reference for understanding and describing the human experience and human behaviour.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosanna Bell

Children with a mental illness may be at a significant risk of suffering from negative social evaluations and the exclusion of their peers. This paper examined healthy preschool children's earliest conceptual constructions of mental health and illness through two elected representations - the term crazy and depictions of emotionally and behaviourally deviant peers. Interviews with eleven preschool children reveal the concept of mental illness has yet to be constructed from a psychological standpoint. However, preschool children are highly sensitive to social-conventional as well as higher moral codes and discriminate against peers' who violate these codes, particulary those who display anti-social tendencies. Findings suggest that preschool is a formative period for establishing negative attitudes towards social and moral code violating behaviours that are often the symptoms of psychiatric conditions and which may represent the onset of more complex and enduring patterns of inter-group intolerance and discrimination. Implications for education are provided.


Anthropology ◽  
2021 ◽  

Anthropological contributions to the study of mental health and illness span diverse literatures and track a wide field of intellectual traditions and debates in their approaches to mental disorder, treatment, and recovery. Much as can be said of anthropology as a discipline more generally, the long history of the anthropological study of mental illness in cross-cultural context has been entwined in large-scale historical processes, including colonialism, racism, migration, war, and globalization. This history has also been shaped by the dynamic dialogue between anthropology, psychology, psychiatry, and global public health, and from which a number of subfields and intellectual traditions have emerged, among them ethnopsychiatry, cultural psychiatry, social psychiatry, and, most recently, global mental health. While certain core themes in the anthropological study of mental disorder that extend back to the early days of anthropology persist today, others have newly emerged in response to contemporary conditions. Collectively, these core themes recognize how mental illness experiences are richly variable and cultural in nature, and that psychiatric diagnosis is itself contingent, involving styles of reasoning and ways of knowing that are culturally informed and shaped by institutional landscapes and translational processes. These core themes include questions regarding psychiatric taxonomy and whether the classification of mental health problems is universal or culturally relative; the structural sources of human distress and suffering; treatment systems and interventions, such as the role of institutions and therapies in shaping the social course and experience of mental illness; the phenomenology of living with mental disorder; and the forms of psychiatric knowledge and practice enacted in contexts ranging from addiction treatment clinics to humanitarian settings. Studies span a wide range of engagement, from cultural critique to intervention studies that position anthropologists as collaborators in the development of effective and accessible interventions. Many studies draw on anthropology’s classic traditions of ethnography and long-term fieldwork, while raising questions and propositions for the relevance of anthropological methods and theories in the face of new ontologies of mental disorder, emergent technological frontiers, changing political and economic contexts, and the global aspirations of mental health treatment. In their complexity, mental health and illness speak to fundamental questions concerning the nature of human experience in changing worlds, making the topic deeply relevant for anthropology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document