scholarly journals Microendoscopy-guided percutaneous cordotomy for intractable pain: case series of 24 patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 389-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erich Talamoni Fonoff ◽  
William Omar Contreras Lopez ◽  
Ywzhe Sifuentes Almeida de Oliveira ◽  
Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Single Channel ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Intractable Pain ◽  
Total Recovery ◽  
Percutaneous Cordotomy ◽  
Real Time Visualization ◽  
Intractable Cancer Pain ◽  
Double Channel

OBJECT The aim of this study was to show that microendoscopic guidance using a double-channel technique could be safely applied during percutaneous cordotomy and provides clear real-time visualization of the spinal cord and surrounding structures during the entire procedure. METHODS Twenty-four adult patients with intractable cancer pain were treated by microendoscopic-guided percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) cordotomy using the double-channel technique under local anesthesia. A percutaneous lateral puncture was performed initially under fluoroscopy guidance to localize the target. When the subarachnoid space was reached by the guiding cannula, the endoscope was inserted for visualization of the spinal cord and surrounding structures. After target visualization, a second needle was inserted to guide the RF electrode. Cordotomy was performed by a standard RF method. RESULTS The microendoscopic double-channel approach provided real-time visualization of the target in 91% of the cases. The other 9% of procedures were performed by the single-channel technique. Significant analgesia was achieved in over 90% of the cases. Two patients had transient ataxia that lasted for a few weeks until total recovery. CONCLUSIONS The use of percutaneous microendoscopic cordotomy with the double-channel technique is useful for specific manipulations of the spinal cord. It provides real-time visualization of the RF probe, thereby adding a degree of safety to the procedure.

scholarly journals Cordotomy for Intractable Cancer Pain: A Narrative Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 3;23 (6;3) ◽  
pp. 283-292
Author(s):  
Salahadin Salahadin
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Intractable Pain ◽  
Spinothalamic Tract ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Percutaneous Cordotomy ◽  
Intractable Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Improvement

Background: Cordotomy is an invasive procedure for the management of intractable pain not controlled by conventional therapies, such as analgesics or nerve block. This procedure involves mechanical disruption of nociceptive pathways in the anterolateral column, specifically the spinothalamic and spinoreticular pathways to relieve pain while preserving fine touch and proprioceptive tracts. Objectives: The purpose of this review article is to refresh our knowledge of cordotomy and support its continued use in managing intractable pain due to malignant disease. Study Design: This is a review article with the goal of reviewing and summarizing the pertinent case reports, case series, retrospective studies, prospective studies, and review articles published from 2010 onward on spinal cordotomy. Setting: The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center. Methods: PubMed search of keywords “spinal cordotomy,” “percutaneous cordotomy,” or “open cordotomy” was undertaken. Search results were organized by year of publication. Results: Cordotomy can be performed via percutaneous, open, endoscopic, or transdiscal approach. Percutaneous image-guided approach is the most well-studied and reported technique compared with others, with relatively good pain improvement both in the postoperative and shortterm period. The use of open cordotomy has diminished significantly in recent years because of the advent of other less invasive approaches. Cordotomy in children, although rare, has been described in some case reports and case series with reported pain improvement postprocedure. Although complications can vary broadly, some reported side effects include ataxia and paresis due to lesion in the spinocerebellar/corticospinal tract; respiratory failure due to lesion in the reticulospinal tract; or sympathetic dysfunction, bladder dysfunctions, or Horner syndrome due to unintentional lesions in the spinothalamic tract. Limitations: Review article included literature published only in English. For the studies reviewed, the sample size was relatively small and the patient population was heterogeneous (in terms of underlying disease process, duration of symptoms, previous treatment attempted and length of follow-up). Conclusions: Cordotomy results in selective loss of pain and temperature perception on the contralateral side, up to several segments below the level of the disruption. The plethora of analgesics available and advanced technologies have reduced the demand for cordotomy in the management of intractable pain. However, some patients with pain unresponsive to medical and procedural management, particularly malignant pain, may benefit from this procedure, and it is a viable treatment option especially for patients with a limited life expectancy whose severe, unilateral pain is unresponsive to analgesic medications. Key words: Cancer pain, cordotomy complications, cordotomy indications, intractable pain, open cordotomy, percutaneous cordotomy

scholarly journals Successful application of burst spinal cord stimulation for refractory upper limb pain: a case series

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 030006052110040
Author(s):  
Kuen Su Lee ◽  
Yoo Kyung Jang ◽  
Gene Hyun Park ◽  
In Jae Jun ◽  
Jae Chul Koh
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Intractable Pain ◽  
Limb Pain ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Upper Limb Pain

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used to treat sustained pain that is intractable despite various types of treatment. However, conventional tonic waveform SCS has not shown promising outcomes for spinal cord injury (SCI) or postamputation pain. The pain signal mechanisms of burst waveforms are different to those of conventional tonic waveforms, but few reports have presented the therapeutic potential of burst waveforms for the abovementioned indications. This current case report describes two patients with refractory upper limb pain after SCI and upper limb amputation that were treated with burst waveform SCS. While the patients could not obtain sufficient therapeutic effect with conventional tonic waveforms, the burst waveforms provided better pain reduction with less discomfort. However, further studies are necessary to better clarify the mechanisms and efficacy of burst waveform SCS in patients with intractable pain.

Intraoperative Neurophysiology for Optimization of Percutaneous Spinothalamic Cordotomy for Intractable Cancer Pain

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yechiam Sapir ◽  
Akiva Korn ◽  
Yifat Bitan-Talmor ◽  
Irina Vendrov ◽  
Assaf Berger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Motor Deficit ◽  
Intensity Difference ◽  
Sensory Threshold ◽  
Intractable Pain ◽  
Spinothalamic Tract ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Stimulation Intensity ◽  
Intractable Cancer Pain

Abstract BACKGROUND Percutaneous ablation of the cervical spinothalamic tract (STT) remains a therapeutic remedy for intractable cancer pain. However, it is accompanied by the risk of collateral damage to essential spinal cord circuitry, including the corticospinal tract (CST). Recent studies describe threshold-based mapping of the CST with the objective of motor bundle preservation during intramedullary spinal cord and supratentorial surgery. OBJECTIVE To assess the possibility that application of spinal cord mapping using intraoperative neuromonitoring in percutaneous cordotomy procedures may aid in minimizing iatrogenic motor tract injury. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the files of 11 patients who underwent percutaneous cervical cordotomy for intractable oncological pain. We performed quantitative electromyogram (EMG) recordings to stimulation of the ablation needle prior to the STT-ablative stage. We compared evoked motor and sensory electrical thresholds, and the electrical span between them as a reliable method to confirm safe electrode location inside the STT. RESULTS Quantified EMG data were collected in 11 patients suffering from intractable cancer pain. The threshold range for evoking motor activity was 0.3 to 1.2 V. Stimulation artifacts were detected from trapezius muscles even at the lowest stimulation intensity, while thenar muscles were found to be maximally sensitive and specific. The minimal stimulation intensity difference between the motor and the sensory threshold, set as “Δ-threshold,” was 0.26 V, with no new motor deficit at 3 days or 1 month postoperatively. CONCLUSION Selective STT ablation is an effective procedure for treating intractable pain. It can be aided by quantitative evoked EMG recordings, with tailored parameters and thresholds.

scholarly journals Intrathecal Infusions for Intractable Cancer Pain: A Qualitative Study of the Impact on a Case Series of Patients and Caregivers

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 371-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippa Hawley ◽  
Elizabeth Beddard-Huber ◽  
Cameron Grose ◽  
William McDonald ◽  
Daphne Lobb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Palliative Care Unit ◽  
Intractable Pain ◽  
Management Service ◽  
Palliative Care Setting ◽  
Intractable Cancer Pain ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Intrathecal Infusion

BACKGROUND: The need for intrathecal infusion in a palliative care setting is infrequent. Despite established efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness, this is considered an ‘extraordinary measure’ in Canada. Patients requiring this approach are not typical palliative care patients, having shorter and more uncertain life expectancies.OBJECTIVES: The present study is a qualitative exploration of the impact of intrathecal pump implantation on cancer patients, and also the impact of the intervention on the staff caring for those patients.METHODS: Palliative care unit patients who received an implanted intrathecal pump or dome catheter for intractable cancer pain participated in multiple semistructured interviews. Doctors and nurses caring for each patient were also interviewed. Interviews were recorded and analyzed for themes. The study terminated when saturation was reached.RESULTS: Six patients participated, with up to three interviews each. Twenty-four staff interviews took place. Patients’ hopes and expectations were not always fully met, but the infusions had a profound positive effect on quality of life. Patients expressed anxiety about dependence on the device, and also on a few highly skilled individuals. Staff interviews revealed a significant impact on the ‘culture’ of the palliative care unit. Clear communication of the rationale for infusion was very important, as was regular education about infusion management.CONCLUSIONS: Implanted intrathecal infusion devices are a necessary part of a tertiary level cancer pain management service for the unfortunate minority with intractable pain. Practical recommendations for care are made for palliative care programs contemplating offering intrathecal infusions.

scholarly journals Neuromodulation in intractable pain management: outcomes and predictors of revisions of spinal cord stimulators

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. E4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyamal C. Bir ◽  
Subhas Konar ◽  
Tanmoy Maiti ◽  
Anil Nanda ◽  
Bharat Guthikonda
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Intractable Pain ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Male Sex

OBJECTIVE Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) appear to be safe and efficacious for chronic intractable back pain. Although there are many reports on percutaneous SCSs, there are very few studies on outcomes of paddle lead SCSs. In addition, the predictors of requirement for SCS revision have not been well established. Here, the authors review the outcome of a case series and attempt to identify the predictors of SCS revisions. METHODS The clinical and radiological information of 141 patients with intractable chronic pain who underwent SCS implantation within the past 20 years was retrospectively reviewed. Paddle lead SCSs were used in this series. Statistical analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS Among 141 cases, 90 (64%) did not require any revision after SCS implantations. Removal of the SCS was required in 14 patients. The average pain score was significantly reduced (preimplantation score of 8 vs postimplantation score of 1.38; p < 0.0001). Younger age, male sex, obesity, a preimplantation pain score ≥ 8, and the presence of neuromuscular pain were identified as predictors of the overall requirement for SCS revision. However, only a preimplantation pain score ≥ 8 was identified as a predictor of early failure of the SCS. CONCLUSIONS Implantation of a paddle lead SCS is a relatively less invasive, safe, and effective procedure for patients with intractable back pain. Revision of the procedure depends on many factors, including younger age, male sex, associated neuromuscular pain, and severity of the pain. Therefore, patients with these factors, for whom implantation of an SCS is planned, should be closely followed for the possible requirement for revision.

Neurological Recovery in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Patient with Delayed Surgical Intervention

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Mochamad Targib Alatas
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury Patient ◽  
Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Score Improvement ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Injury Patient

Early surgical treatment for traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients has been proven to yield better improvement on neurological state, and widely practiced among surgeons in this field. However, it is not always affordable in every clinical setting. It is undeniable that surgery for chronic SCI has more challenges as the malunion of vertebral bones might have initiated, thus requires more complex operating techniques. In this case series, we report 7 patients with traumatic SCI whose surgical intervention is delayed due to several reasons. Initial motoric scores vary from 0 to 3, all have their interval periods supervised between outpatient clinic visits. On follow up they demonstrate significant neurological development defined by at least 2 grades motoric score improvement. Physical rehabilitation also began before surgery was conducted. These results should encourage surgeons to keep striving for the patient’s best interest, even when the injury has taken place weeks or even months before surgery is feasible because clinical improvement for these patients is not impossible. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document